TSTP Solution File: SET674+3 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SET674+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:19:59 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 1.35s 1.54s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : SET674+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 21:50:59 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.41 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.41 The process was started by sandbox on n003.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.41 Sun Jul 10 21:50:59 2022
% 0.20/0.41 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 25075.
% 0.20/0.41
% 0.20/0.41 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.41 set(auto).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.41 clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.41
% 0.20/0.41 formula_list(usable).
% 0.20/0.41
% 0.20/0.41 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=7.
% 0.20/0.41
% 0.20/0.41 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.20/0.41 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.20/0.41 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.20/0.41 clauses in usable.
% 0.20/0.41
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.41 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.41
% 0.20/0.41 ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 3 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ilf_type(A,set_type)| -ilf_type(B,set_type)| -ilf_type(C,binary_relation_type)| -member(ordered_pair(A,B),C)|member(A,domain_of(C)).
% 0.20/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 6 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ilf_type(A,set_type)| -ilf_type(B,set_type)| -ilf_type(C,binary_relation_type)| -member(ordered_pair(A,B),C)|member(B,range_of(C)).
% 0.20/0.41
% 0.20/0.41 ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 178 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ilf_type($c4,set_type).
% 0.20/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 178 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ilf_type($c3,set_type).
% 0.20/0.41 178 back subsumes 133.
% 0.20/0.41 178 back subsumes 132.
% 0.20/0.41 178 back subsumes 127.
% 0.20/0.41 178 back subsumes 119.
% 0.20/0.41 178 back subsumes 112.
% 0.20/0.41 178 back subsumes 111.
% 0.20/0.41 178 back subsumes 92.
% 0.20/0.41 178 back subsumes 86.
% 0.20/0.41 178 back subsumes 80.
% 0.20/0.41 178 back subsumes 65.
% 0.20/0.41 178 back subsumes 60.
% 0.20/0.41 178 back subsumes 57.
% 0.20/0.41 178 back subsumes 56.
% 0.20/0.41 178 back subsumes 52.
% 0.20/0.41 178 back subsumes 48.
% 0.20/0.41 178 back subsumes 43.
% 0.20/0.41 178 back subsumes 39.
% 0.20/0.41 178 back subsumes 31.
% 0.20/0.41 178 back subsumes 30.
% 0.20/0.41 178 back subsumes 29.
% 0.20/0.41 178 back subsumes 28.
% 0.20/0.41 178 back subsumes 27.
% 0.20/0.41 178 back subsumes 26.
% 0.20/0.41 178 back subsumes 15.
% 0.20/0.41 178 back subsumes 11.
% 0.20/0.41 178 back subsumes 7.
% 0.20/0.41 178 back subsumes 4.
% 0.20/0.41 178 back subsumes 1.
% 0.20/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 180 during input processing: 0 [copy,180,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.20/0.41 180 back subsumes 121.
% 0.20/0.41 180 back subsumes 120.
% 0.20/0.41 180 back subsumes 110.
% 0.20/0.41 180 back subsumes 94.
% 0.20/0.41 180 back subsumes 93.
% 0.20/0.41
% 0.20/0.41 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.35/0.55
% 0.35/0.55 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.35/0.55
% 0.35/0.55 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.35/0.55
% 0.35/0.55
% 0.35/0.55 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.35/0.55
% 0.35/0.55 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.35/0.55 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.35/0.55 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.35/0.55 number of clauses in intial UL: 141
% 0.35/0.55 number of clauses initially in problem: 145
% 0.35/0.55 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 97
% 0.35/0.55 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 97
% 0.35/0.55 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 99
% 0.35/0.55 absolute distinct symbol count: 41
% 0.35/0.55 distinct predicate count: 6
% 0.35/0.55 distinct function count: 29
% 0.35/0.55 distinct constant count: 6
% 0.35/0.55
% 0.35/0.55 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.35/0.55
% 0.35/0.55
% 0.35/0.55
% 0.35/0.55 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.35/0.55
% 0.35/0.55 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.35/0.55
% 0.35/0.55 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.35/1.54
% 1.35/1.54 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 1.35/1.54 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 1.35/1.54 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 1.35/1.54 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 1.35/1.54
% 1.35/1.54
% 1.35/1.54 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.35/1.54
% 1.35/1.54 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.35/1.54
% 1.35/1.54 Model 3 [ 2 3 27810 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.35/1.54
% 1.35/1.54 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.35/1.54
% 1.35/1.54 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.35/1.54
% 1.35/1.54 Model 4 [ 3 1 11418 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.35/1.54
% 1.35/1.54 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.35/1.54
% 1.35/1.54 true clauses given 2 (33.3%)
% 1.35/1.54 false clauses given 4
% 1.35/1.54
% 1.35/1.54 FALSE TRUE
% 1.35/1.54 3 0 1
% 1.35/1.54 5 0 1
% 1.35/1.54 6 0 2
% 1.35/1.54 7 6 0
% 1.35/1.54 8 3 2
% 1.35/1.54 9 8 2
% 1.35/1.54 11 0 3
% 1.35/1.54 12 1 3
% 1.35/1.54 13 3 10
% 1.35/1.54 15 0 6
% 1.35/1.54 17 1 3
% 1.35/1.54 19 0 2
% 1.35/1.54 tot: 22 35 (61.4% true)
% 1.35/1.54
% 1.35/1.54
% 1.35/1.54 Model 4 [ 3 1 11418 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.35/1.54
% 1.35/1.54 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 1.35/1.54 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 1.35/1.54 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 1.35/1.54 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 1.35/1.54
% 1.35/1.54
% 1.35/1.54 The job finished Sun Jul 10 21:51:00 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------