TSTP Solution File: SET669+3 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SET669+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:11:25 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.38s 0.57s
% Output   : Refutation 0.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   42 (  16 unt;   4 nHn;  40 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  103 (  12 equ;  65 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   14 (  14 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   63 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ subset(X,Y)
    | ~ subset(Y,X)
    | X = Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p1) ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Z,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(U,relation_type(X,Y))
    | ~ subset(identity_relation_of(Z),U)
    | subset(Z,domain(X,Y,U)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2) ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Z,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(U,relation_type(X,Y))
    | ~ subset(identity_relation_of(Z),U)
    | subset(Z,range(X,Y,U)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2) ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | subset(X,Y)
    | member('SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,Y),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p7) ).

cnf(14,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | subset(X,Y)
    | ~ member('SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,Y),Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p7) ).

cnf(28,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,subset_type(X))
    | ilf_type(Y,member_type(power_set(X))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p16) ).

cnf(33,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ member(X,power_set(Y))
    | ~ ilf_type(Z,set_type)
    | ~ member(Z,X)
    | member(Z,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p20) ).

cnf(37,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ empty(power_set(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p21) ).

cnf(39,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | empty(Y)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(X,member_type(Y))
    | member(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p22) ).

cnf(53,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Z,relation_type(X,Y))
    | domain(X,Y,Z) = domain_of(Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p28) ).

cnf(55,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Z,relation_type(X,Y))
    | range(X,Y,Z) = range_of(Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p30) ).

cnf(56,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Z,relation_type(X,Y))
    | ilf_type(range(X,Y,Z),subset_type(Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p31) ).

cnf(57,axiom,
    ilf_type(X,set_type),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p32) ).

cnf(58,negated_conjecture,
    ilf_type('SKOLEMAAAV15',relation_type('SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV14')),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_relset_1_32) ).

cnf(59,negated_conjecture,
    subset(identity_relation_of('SKOLEMAAAV14'),'SKOLEMAAAV15'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_relset_1_32) ).

cnf(60,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset('SKOLEMAAAV14',domain('SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV14','SKOLEMAAAV15'))
    | 'SKOLEMAAAV14' != range('SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV14','SKOLEMAAAV15') ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_relset_1_32) ).

cnf(62,plain,
    ( ~ subset(X,Y)
    | ~ subset(Y,X)
    | X = Y ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1,57]) ).

cnf(63,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,relation_type(Y,Z))
    | ~ subset(identity_relation_of(U),X)
    | subset(U,domain(Y,Z,X)) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[2,57]) ).

cnf(64,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,relation_type(Y,Z))
    | ~ subset(identity_relation_of(U),X)
    | subset(U,range(Y,Z,X)) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[3,57]) ).

cnf(73,plain,
    ( subset(X,Y)
    | member('SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,Y),X) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[13,57]) ).

cnf(74,plain,
    ( subset(X,Y)
    | ~ member('SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,Y),Y) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[14,57]) ).

cnf(78,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,subset_type(Y))
    | ilf_type(X,member_type(power_set(Y))) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[28,57]) ).

cnf(82,plain,
    ( ~ member(X,power_set(Y))
    | ~ member(Z,X)
    | member(Z,Y) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[33,57]) ).

cnf(85,plain,
    ~ empty(power_set(X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[37,57]) ).

cnf(86,plain,
    ( empty(X)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,member_type(X))
    | member(Y,X) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[39,57]) ).

cnf(96,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,relation_type(Y,Z))
    | domain(Y,Z,X) = domain_of(X) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[53,57]) ).

cnf(98,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,relation_type(Y,Z))
    | range(Y,Z,X) = range_of(X) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[55,57]) ).

cnf(99,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,relation_type(Y,Z))
    | ilf_type(range(Y,Z,X),subset_type(Z)) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[56,57]) ).

cnf(134,plain,
    domain('SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV14','SKOLEMAAAV15') = domain_of('SKOLEMAAAV15'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[96,58]) ).

cnf(135,plain,
    ( ~ subset('SKOLEMAAAV14',domain_of('SKOLEMAAAV15'))
    | 'SKOLEMAAAV14' != range('SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV14','SKOLEMAAAV15') ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[60,134,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(139,plain,
    range('SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV14','SKOLEMAAAV15') = range_of('SKOLEMAAAV15'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[98,58]) ).

cnf(140,plain,
    ( ~ subset('SKOLEMAAAV14',domain_of('SKOLEMAAAV15'))
    | 'SKOLEMAAAV14' != range_of('SKOLEMAAAV15') ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[135,139,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(142,plain,
    ilf_type(range_of('SKOLEMAAAV15'),subset_type('SKOLEMAAAV14')),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[99,58]),139,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(144,plain,
    subset('SKOLEMAAAV14',domain_of('SKOLEMAAAV15')),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[63,58,59]),134,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(145,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAV14' != range_of('SKOLEMAAAV15'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[140,144]) ).

cnf(150,plain,
    subset('SKOLEMAAAV14',range_of('SKOLEMAAAV15')),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[64,58,59]),139,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(167,plain,
    ~ subset(range_of('SKOLEMAAAV15'),'SKOLEMAAAV14'),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[62,150,145]) ).

cnf(171,plain,
    member('SKOLEMAAAV2'(range_of('SKOLEMAAAV15'),'SKOLEMAAAV14'),range_of('SKOLEMAAAV15')),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[62,150,73]),145]) ).

cnf(173,plain,
    ilf_type(range_of('SKOLEMAAAV15'),member_type(power_set('SKOLEMAAAV14'))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[78,142]) ).

cnf(174,plain,
    ~ member('SKOLEMAAAV2'(range_of('SKOLEMAAAV15'),'SKOLEMAAAV14'),'SKOLEMAAAV14'),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[74,167]) ).

cnf(247,plain,
    member(range_of('SKOLEMAAAV15'),power_set('SKOLEMAAAV14')),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[86,173,85]) ).

cnf(320,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[82,171,247]),174]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : SET669+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 12:09:31 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45  * 
% 0.19/0.45  * 
% 0.19/0.46  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.46   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.46   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  "."
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-10T12:09:31
% 0.19/0.46  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n025.cluster.edu at 2022-07-10T12:09:31
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  #||
% 0.38/0.57  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.38/0.57  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.38/0.57  ||#
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.38/0.57  ;       566 formulas have been input or derived (from 95 formulas).
% 0.38/0.57  ;       320 (57%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.38/0.57  ;           63 (20%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.38/0.57  ;          257 (80%) are still being kept.
% 0.38/0.57  ; 
% 0.38/0.57  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.010   9%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.003   3%   Assert                       (33 calls)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.024  22%   Process new row              (464 calls)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.013  12%   Resolution                   (188 calls)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.000   0%   Paramodulation               (94 calls)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (11 calls)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.000   0%   Condensing                   (244 calls)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.005   5%   Forward subsumption          (244 calls)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.007   6%   Backward subsumption         (216 calls)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (121 calls)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.013  12%   Forward simplification       (464 calls)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.006   6%   Backward simplification      (320 calls)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.001   1%   Ordering                     (211 calls)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.027  25%   Other
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.109        Total
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.113        Real time
% 0.38/0.57  ; 
% 0.38/0.57  ; Term-hash-array has 691 terms in all.
% 0.38/0.57  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 155 entries (157 at peak, 216 added, 61 deleted).
% 0.38/0.57  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,011 nodes (1,013 at peak, 1,296 added, 285 deleted).
% 0.38/0.57  ;  Retrieved 141 possibly forward subsuming rows in 244 calls.
% 0.38/0.57  ;  Retrieved 21 possibly backward subsumed rows in 216 calls.
% 0.38/0.57  ; Path-index has 647 entries (647 at peak, 756 added, 109 deleted).
% 0.38/0.57  ; Path-index has 1,978 nodes (1,978 at peak, 2,110 added, 132 deleted).
% 0.38/0.57  ; Trie-index has 647 entries (647 at peak, 756 added, 109 deleted).
% 0.38/0.57  ; Trie-index has 2,484 nodes (2,484 at peak, 2,746 added, 262 deleted).
% 0.38/0.57  ; Retrieved 324 generalization terms in 788 calls.
% 0.38/0.57  ; Retrieved 145 instance terms in 103 calls.
% 0.38/0.57  ; Retrieved 4,574 unifiable terms in 1,119 calls.
% 0.38/0.57  ; 
% 0.38/0.57  ; The agenda of rows to process has 6 entries:
% 0.38/0.57  ;     3 with value 13              1 with value 20               1 with value 22
% 0.38/0.57  ;     1 with value 19
% 0.38/0.57  ; The agenda of rows to give has 165 entries:
% 0.38/0.57  ;     1 with value (4 8)           3 with value (4 21)           2 with value (4 33)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     8 with value (4 12)          8 with value (4 22)           4 with value (4 35)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     9 with value (4 13)          4 with value (4 23)           3 with value (4 36)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     8 with value (4 14)          1 with value (4 24)           1 with value (4 37)
% 0.38/0.57  ;    15 with value (4 15)          4 with value (4 25)           1 with value (4 38)
% 0.38/0.57  ;    19 with value (4 16)          4 with value (4 26)           1 with value (4 40)
% 0.38/0.57  ;    14 with value (4 17)          4 with value (4 27)           1 with value (4 41)
% 0.38/0.57  ;    10 with value (4 18)          3 with value (4 28)           1 with value (4 42)
% 0.38/0.57  ;    12 with value (4 19)          6 with value (4 30)           1 with value (4 44)
% 0.38/0.57  ;    13 with value (4 20)          4 with value (4 32)
% 0.38/0.57  Evaluation took:
% 0.38/0.57    0.113 seconds of real time
% 0.38/0.57    0.099868 seconds of user run time
% 0.38/0.57    0.013236 seconds of system run time
% 0.38/0.57    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.38/0.57    0 page faults and
% 0.38/0.57    9,484,528 bytes consed.
% 0.38/0.57  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.38/0.57  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-10T12:09:31
% 0.38/0.57  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.38/0.57  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------