TSTP Solution File: SET668+3 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SET668+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:11:24 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.39s 0.60s
% Output   : Refutation 0.39s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   42 (  16 unt;   4 nHn;  40 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  103 (  12 equ;  65 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   14 (  14 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   63 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ subset(X,Y)
    | ~ subset(Y,X)
    | X = Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p1) ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Z,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(U,relation_type(X,Y))
    | ~ subset(identity_relation_of(Z),U)
    | subset(Z,domain(X,Y,U)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2) ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Z,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(U,relation_type(X,Y))
    | ~ subset(identity_relation_of(Z),U)
    | subset(Z,range(X,Y,U)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2) ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | subset(X,Y)
    | member('SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,Y),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p7) ).

cnf(14,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | subset(X,Y)
    | ~ member('SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,Y),Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p7) ).

cnf(28,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,subset_type(X))
    | ilf_type(Y,member_type(power_set(X))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p16) ).

cnf(33,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ member(X,power_set(Y))
    | ~ ilf_type(Z,set_type)
    | ~ member(Z,X)
    | member(Z,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p20) ).

cnf(37,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ empty(power_set(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p21) ).

cnf(39,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | empty(Y)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(X,member_type(Y))
    | member(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p22) ).

cnf(53,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Z,relation_type(X,Y))
    | domain(X,Y,Z) = domain_of(Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p28) ).

cnf(54,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Z,relation_type(X,Y))
    | ilf_type(domain(X,Y,Z),subset_type(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p29) ).

cnf(55,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Z,relation_type(X,Y))
    | range(X,Y,Z) = range_of(Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p30) ).

cnf(57,axiom,
    ilf_type(X,set_type),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p32) ).

cnf(58,negated_conjecture,
    ilf_type('SKOLEMAAAV15',relation_type('SKOLEMAAAV14','SKOLEMAAAV13')),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_relset_1_31) ).

cnf(59,negated_conjecture,
    subset(identity_relation_of('SKOLEMAAAV14'),'SKOLEMAAAV15'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_relset_1_31) ).

cnf(60,negated_conjecture,
    ( 'SKOLEMAAAV14' != domain('SKOLEMAAAV14','SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV15')
    | ~ subset('SKOLEMAAAV14',range('SKOLEMAAAV14','SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV15')) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_relset_1_31) ).

cnf(62,plain,
    ( ~ subset(X,Y)
    | ~ subset(Y,X)
    | X = Y ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1,57]) ).

cnf(63,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,relation_type(Y,Z))
    | ~ subset(identity_relation_of(U),X)
    | subset(U,domain(Y,Z,X)) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[2,57]) ).

cnf(64,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,relation_type(Y,Z))
    | ~ subset(identity_relation_of(U),X)
    | subset(U,range(Y,Z,X)) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[3,57]) ).

cnf(73,plain,
    ( subset(X,Y)
    | member('SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,Y),X) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[13,57]) ).

cnf(74,plain,
    ( subset(X,Y)
    | ~ member('SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,Y),Y) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[14,57]) ).

cnf(78,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,subset_type(Y))
    | ilf_type(X,member_type(power_set(Y))) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[28,57]) ).

cnf(82,plain,
    ( ~ member(X,power_set(Y))
    | ~ member(Z,X)
    | member(Z,Y) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[33,57]) ).

cnf(85,plain,
    ~ empty(power_set(X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[37,57]) ).

cnf(86,plain,
    ( empty(X)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,member_type(X))
    | member(Y,X) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[39,57]) ).

cnf(96,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,relation_type(Y,Z))
    | domain(Y,Z,X) = domain_of(X) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[53,57]) ).

cnf(97,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,relation_type(Y,Z))
    | ilf_type(domain(Y,Z,X),subset_type(Y)) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[54,57]) ).

cnf(98,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,relation_type(Y,Z))
    | range(Y,Z,X) = range_of(X) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[55,57]) ).

cnf(134,plain,
    domain('SKOLEMAAAV14','SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV15') = domain_of('SKOLEMAAAV15'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[96,58]) ).

cnf(135,plain,
    ( 'SKOLEMAAAV14' != domain_of('SKOLEMAAAV15')
    | ~ subset('SKOLEMAAAV14',range('SKOLEMAAAV14','SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV15')) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[60,134,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(137,plain,
    ilf_type(domain_of('SKOLEMAAAV15'),subset_type('SKOLEMAAAV14')),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[97,58]),134,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(139,plain,
    range('SKOLEMAAAV14','SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV15') = range_of('SKOLEMAAAV15'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[98,58]) ).

cnf(140,plain,
    ( 'SKOLEMAAAV14' != domain_of('SKOLEMAAAV15')
    | ~ subset('SKOLEMAAAV14',range_of('SKOLEMAAAV15')) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[135,139,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(144,plain,
    subset('SKOLEMAAAV14',domain_of('SKOLEMAAAV15')),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[63,58,59]),134,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(147,plain,
    subset('SKOLEMAAAV14',range_of('SKOLEMAAAV15')),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[64,58,59]),139,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(148,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAV14' != domain_of('SKOLEMAAAV15'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[140,147]) ).

cnf(163,plain,
    ~ subset(domain_of('SKOLEMAAAV15'),'SKOLEMAAAV14'),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[62,144,148]) ).

cnf(167,plain,
    member('SKOLEMAAAV2'(domain_of('SKOLEMAAAV15'),'SKOLEMAAAV14'),domain_of('SKOLEMAAAV15')),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[62,144,73]),148]) ).

cnf(172,plain,
    ilf_type(domain_of('SKOLEMAAAV15'),member_type(power_set('SKOLEMAAAV14'))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[78,137]) ).

cnf(174,plain,
    ~ member('SKOLEMAAAV2'(domain_of('SKOLEMAAAV15'),'SKOLEMAAAV14'),'SKOLEMAAAV14'),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[74,163]) ).

cnf(240,plain,
    member(domain_of('SKOLEMAAAV15'),power_set('SKOLEMAAAV14')),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[86,172,85]) ).

cnf(312,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[82,167,240]),174]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SET668+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 10:57:08 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  "."
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-10T10:57:08
% 0.20/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n015.cluster.edu at 2022-07-10T10:57:08
% 0.39/0.60  
% 0.39/0.60  
% 0.39/0.60  #||
% 0.39/0.60  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/0.60  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.39/0.60  ||#
% 0.39/0.60  
% 0.39/0.60  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.39/0.60  ;       554 formulas have been input or derived (from 93 formulas).
% 0.39/0.60  ;       312 (56%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.39/0.60  ;           63 (20%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.39/0.60  ;          249 (80%) are still being kept.
% 0.39/0.60  ; 
% 0.39/0.60  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.39/0.60  ;     0.010   8%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.39/0.60  ;     0.003   3%   Assert                       (33 calls)
% 0.39/0.60  ;     0.031  26%   Process new row              (454 calls)
% 0.39/0.60  ;     0.014  12%   Resolution                   (184 calls)
% 0.39/0.60  ;     0.001   1%   Paramodulation               (92 calls)
% 0.39/0.60  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (9 calls)
% 0.39/0.60  ;     0.010   8%   Condensing                   (234 calls)
% 0.39/0.60  ;     0.009   8%   Forward subsumption          (234 calls)
% 0.39/0.60  ;     0.004   3%   Backward subsumption         (208 calls)
% 0.39/0.60  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (109 calls)
% 0.39/0.60  ;     0.004   3%   Forward simplification       (454 calls)
% 0.39/0.60  ;     0.005   4%   Backward simplification      (312 calls)
% 0.39/0.60  ;     0.001   1%   Ordering                     (200 calls)
% 0.39/0.60  ;     0.001   1%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.39/0.60  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.39/0.60  ;     0.025  21%   Other
% 0.39/0.60  ;     0.118        Total
% 0.39/0.60  ;     0.122        Real time
% 0.39/0.60  ; 
% 0.39/0.60  ; Term-hash-array has 681 terms in all.
% 0.39/0.60  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 147 entries (149 at peak, 208 added, 61 deleted).
% 0.39/0.60  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 951 nodes (971 at peak, 1,254 added, 303 deleted).
% 0.39/0.60  ;  Retrieved 127 possibly forward subsuming rows in 234 calls.
% 0.39/0.60  ;  Retrieved 21 possibly backward subsumed rows in 208 calls.
% 0.39/0.60  ; Path-index has 637 entries (637 at peak, 746 added, 109 deleted).
% 0.39/0.60  ; Path-index has 1,970 nodes (1,970 at peak, 2,103 added, 133 deleted).
% 0.39/0.60  ; Trie-index has 637 entries (637 at peak, 746 added, 109 deleted).
% 0.39/0.60  ; Trie-index has 2,466 nodes (2,466 at peak, 2,732 added, 266 deleted).
% 0.39/0.60  ; Retrieved 324 generalization terms in 762 calls.
% 0.39/0.60  ; Retrieved 145 instance terms in 103 calls.
% 0.39/0.60  ; Retrieved 4,508 unifiable terms in 1,092 calls.
% 0.39/0.60  ; 
% 0.39/0.60  ; The agenda of rows to process has 6 entries:
% 0.39/0.60  ;     3 with value 13              1 with value 20               1 with value 22
% 0.39/0.60  ;     1 with value 19
% 0.39/0.60  ; The agenda of rows to give has 159 entries:
% 0.39/0.60  ;     1 with value (4 8)           3 with value (4 21)           2 with value (4 33)
% 0.39/0.60  ;    10 with value (4 12)          6 with value (4 22)           4 with value (4 35)
% 0.39/0.60  ;     7 with value (4 13)          4 with value (4 23)           3 with value (4 36)
% 0.39/0.60  ;     8 with value (4 14)          1 with value (4 24)           1 with value (4 37)
% 0.39/0.60  ;    15 with value (4 15)          4 with value (4 25)           1 with value (4 38)
% 0.39/0.60  ;    19 with value (4 16)          4 with value (4 26)           1 with value (4 40)
% 0.39/0.60  ;    14 with value (4 17)          4 with value (4 27)           1 with value (4 41)
% 0.39/0.60  ;     8 with value (4 18)          3 with value (4 28)           1 with value (4 42)
% 0.39/0.60  ;    12 with value (4 19)          6 with value (4 30)           1 with value (4 44)
% 0.39/0.60  ;    11 with value (4 20)          4 with value (4 32)
% 0.39/0.60  Evaluation took:
% 0.39/0.60    0.122 seconds of real time
% 0.39/0.60    0.102073 seconds of user run time
% 0.39/0.60    0.020299 seconds of system run time
% 0.39/0.60    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.39/0.60    0 page faults and
% 0.39/0.60    9,370,048 bytes consed.
% 0.39/0.60  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.39/0.60  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-10T10:57:08
% 0.39/0.60  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.39/0.60  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------