TSTP Solution File: SET665+3 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SET665+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:19:54 EDT 2022

% Result   : Timeout 300.04s 300.22s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : SET665+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 02:20:42 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.42  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.42  The process was started by sandbox2 on n018.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.42  Sun Jul 10 02:20:42 2022
% 0.19/0.42  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 23555.
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.42  set(auto).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.42  clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  formula_list(usable).
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=9.
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.19/0.42  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.19/0.42  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.19/0.42  clauses in usable.
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.42    Following clause subsumed by 6 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ilf_type(A,set_type)| -ilf_type(B,set_type)| -ilf_type(C,set_type)| -member(ordered_pair(B,C),identity_relation_of(A))|member(B,A).
% 0.19/0.42    Following clause subsumed by 7 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ilf_type(A,set_type)| -ilf_type(B,set_type)| -ilf_type(C,set_type)| -member(ordered_pair(B,C),identity_relation_of(A))|B=C.
% 0.19/0.42    Following clause subsumed by 8 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ilf_type(A,set_type)| -ilf_type(B,set_type)| -ilf_type(C,set_type)|member(ordered_pair(B,C),identity_relation_of(A))| -member(B,A)|B!=C.
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.42    Following clause subsumed by 211 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ilf_type($c2,set_type).
% 0.19/0.42  211 back subsumes 164.
% 0.19/0.42  211 back subsumes 163.
% 0.19/0.42  211 back subsumes 134.
% 0.19/0.42  211 back subsumes 125.
% 0.19/0.42  211 back subsumes 124.
% 0.19/0.42  211 back subsumes 118.
% 0.19/0.42  211 back subsumes 115.
% 0.19/0.42  211 back subsumes 94.
% 0.19/0.42  211 back subsumes 93.
% 0.19/0.42  211 back subsumes 92.
% 0.19/0.42  211 back subsumes 91.
% 0.19/0.42  211 back subsumes 90.
% 0.19/0.42  211 back subsumes 89.
% 0.19/0.42  211 back subsumes 55.
% 0.19/0.42  211 back subsumes 50.
% 0.19/0.42  211 back subsumes 46.
% 0.19/0.42  211 back subsumes 41.
% 0.19/0.42  211 back subsumes 38.
% 0.19/0.42  211 back subsumes 37.
% 0.19/0.42  211 back subsumes 26.
% 0.19/0.42  211 back subsumes 23.
% 0.19/0.42  211 back subsumes 20.
% 0.19/0.42  211 back subsumes 14.
% 0.19/0.42  211 back subsumes 13.
% 0.19/0.42  211 back subsumes 3.
% 0.19/0.42  211 back subsumes 2.
% 0.19/0.42    Following clause subsumed by 212 during input processing: 0 [copy,212,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.42  212 back subsumes 141.
% 0.19/0.42  212 back subsumes 65.
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.47  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.47  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.47  number of clauses in intial UL: 179
% 0.19/0.47  number of clauses initially in problem: 182
% 0.19/0.47  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 98
% 0.19/0.47  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 96
% 0.19/0.47  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.47  absolute distinct symbol count: 30
% 0.19/0.47     distinct predicate count: 6
% 0.19/0.47     distinct function count: 20
% 0.19/0.47     distinct constant count: 4
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  =========== start of search ===========
% 300.04/300.22  Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------