TSTP Solution File: SET664+3 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SET664+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:52:59 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 1.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  128 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  144 (  55   ~;  53   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  23  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   62 (   6 sgn  34   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(p28,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ilf_type(X1,set_type)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ilf_type(X2,set_type)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( ilf_type(X3,subset_type(cross_product(X1,X2)))
             => relation_like(X3) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',p28) ).

fof(p33,axiom,
    ! [X1] : ilf_type(X1,set_type),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',p33) ).

fof(p6,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ilf_type(X1,set_type)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ilf_type(X2,set_type)
         => ( ! [X3] :
                ( ilf_type(X3,subset_type(cross_product(X1,X2)))
               => ilf_type(X3,relation_type(X1,X2)) )
            & ! [X4] :
                ( ilf_type(X4,relation_type(X1,X2))
               => ilf_type(X4,subset_type(cross_product(X1,X2))) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',p6) ).

fof(p3,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ilf_type(X1,set_type)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ilf_type(X2,set_type)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( ilf_type(X3,relation_type(X1,X2))
             => ( subset(domain_of(X3),X1)
                & subset(range_of(X3),X2) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',p3) ).

fof(prove_relset_1_27,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ilf_type(X1,set_type)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ilf_type(X2,set_type)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( ilf_type(X3,relation_type(X2,X1))
             => ( ilf_type(X3,relation_type(X2,empty_set))
               => X3 = empty_set ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',prove_relset_1_27) ).

fof(p13,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ilf_type(X1,set_type)
     => ( ilf_type(X1,binary_relation_type)
      <=> ( relation_like(X1)
          & ilf_type(X1,set_type) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',p13) ).

fof(p1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ilf_type(X1,set_type)
     => ( subset(X1,empty_set)
       => X1 = empty_set ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',p1) ).

fof(p2,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ilf_type(X1,binary_relation_type)
     => ( ( domain_of(X1) = empty_set
          | range_of(X1) = empty_set )
       => X1 = empty_set ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',p2) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ ilf_type(X4,set_type)
      | ~ ilf_type(X5,set_type)
      | ~ ilf_type(X6,subset_type(cross_product(X4,X5)))
      | relation_like(X6) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[p28])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X2] : ilf_type(X2,set_type),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[p33]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X5,X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ( ~ ilf_type(X7,subset_type(cross_product(X5,X6)))
        | ilf_type(X7,relation_type(X5,X6))
        | ~ ilf_type(X6,set_type)
        | ~ ilf_type(X5,set_type) )
      & ( ~ ilf_type(X8,relation_type(X5,X6))
        | ilf_type(X8,subset_type(cross_product(X5,X6)))
        | ~ ilf_type(X6,set_type)
        | ~ ilf_type(X5,set_type) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[p6])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( subset(domain_of(X6),X4)
        | ~ ilf_type(X6,relation_type(X4,X5))
        | ~ ilf_type(X5,set_type)
        | ~ ilf_type(X4,set_type) )
      & ( subset(range_of(X6),X5)
        | ~ ilf_type(X6,relation_type(X4,X5))
        | ~ ilf_type(X5,set_type)
        | ~ ilf_type(X4,set_type) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[p3])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ilf_type(X1,set_type)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ilf_type(X2,set_type)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ilf_type(X3,relation_type(X2,X1))
               => ( ilf_type(X3,relation_type(X2,empty_set))
                 => X3 = empty_set ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_relset_1_27]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ( relation_like(X2)
        | ~ ilf_type(X2,binary_relation_type)
        | ~ ilf_type(X2,set_type) )
      & ( ilf_type(X2,set_type)
        | ~ ilf_type(X2,binary_relation_type)
        | ~ ilf_type(X2,set_type) )
      & ( ~ relation_like(X2)
        | ~ ilf_type(X2,set_type)
        | ilf_type(X2,binary_relation_type)
        | ~ ilf_type(X2,set_type) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[p13])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( relation_like(X1)
    | ~ ilf_type(X1,subset_type(cross_product(X2,X3)))
    | ~ ilf_type(X3,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(X2,set_type) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ilf_type(X1,set_type),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ilf_type(X3,subset_type(cross_product(X1,X2)))
    | ~ ilf_type(X1,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(X2,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(X3,relation_type(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ ilf_type(X2,set_type)
      | ~ subset(X2,empty_set)
      | X2 = empty_set ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[p1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( subset(range_of(X3),X2)
    | ~ ilf_type(X1,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(X2,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(X3,relation_type(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ilf_type(esk13_0,set_type)
    & ilf_type(esk14_0,set_type)
    & ilf_type(esk15_0,relation_type(esk14_0,esk13_0))
    & ilf_type(esk15_0,relation_type(esk14_0,empty_set))
    & esk15_0 != empty_set ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ilf_type(X1,binary_relation_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(X1,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(X1,set_type)
    | ~ relation_like(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( relation_like(X1)
    | ~ ilf_type(X1,subset_type(cross_product(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ilf_type(X1,subset_type(cross_product(X2,X3)))
    | ~ ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_15]),c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | ~ subset(X1,empty_set)
    | ~ ilf_type(X1,set_type) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( subset(range_of(X1),X2)
    | ~ ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_15]),c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ilf_type(esk15_0,relation_type(esk14_0,empty_set)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ilf_type(X1,binary_relation_type)
    | ~ relation_like(X1)
    | ~ ilf_type(X1,set_type) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( relation_like(X1)
    | ~ ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ilf_type(esk15_0,relation_type(esk14_0,esk13_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

fof(c_0_29,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ( domain_of(X2) != empty_set
        | X2 = empty_set
        | ~ ilf_type(X2,binary_relation_type) )
      & ( range_of(X2) != empty_set
        | X2 = empty_set
        | ~ ilf_type(X2,binary_relation_type) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[p2])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | ~ subset(X1,empty_set) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    subset(range_of(esk15_0),empty_set),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ilf_type(X1,binary_relation_type)
    | ~ relation_like(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    relation_like(esk15_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | ~ ilf_type(X1,binary_relation_type)
    | range_of(X1) != empty_set ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    range_of(esk15_0) = empty_set,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ilf_type(esk15_0,binary_relation_type),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    esk15_0 != empty_set,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36])]),c_0_37]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SET664+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 11:00:37 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/1.42  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.42  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 0.23/1.42  
% 0.23/1.42  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.23/1.42  # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.23/1.42  # Parsed axioms                        : 35
% 0.23/1.42  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 29
% 0.23/1.42  # Initial clauses                      : 12
% 0.23/1.42  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 12
% 0.23/1.42  # Processed clauses                    : 12
% 0.23/1.42  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.23/1.42  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # ...remaining for further processing  : 11
% 0.23/1.42  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.23/1.42  # Generated clauses                    : 2
% 0.23/1.42  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Paramodulations                      : 2
% 0.23/1.42  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of processed clauses  : 9
% 0.23/1.42  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
% 0.23/1.42  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.42  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.23/1.42  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.42  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 0.23/1.42  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.23/1.42  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.23/1.42  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1093
% 0.23/1.42  
% 0.23/1.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.42  # User time                : 0.014 s
% 0.23/1.42  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.23/1.42  # Total time               : 0.015 s
% 0.23/1.42  # Maximum resident set size: 2732 pages
% 0.23/1.42  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.019 s
% 0.23/1.42  
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.42  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.42  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object total steps             : 39
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object clause steps            : 22
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object formula steps           : 17
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object conjectures             : 11
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 8
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 10
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 8
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object generating inferences   : 6
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 17
% 0.23/1.42  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.42  # Parsed axioms                        : 35
% 0.23/1.42  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Initial clauses                      : 65
% 0.23/1.42  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 5
% 0.23/1.42  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 60
% 0.23/1.42  # Processed clauses                    : 74
% 0.23/1.42  # ...of these trivial                  : 16
% 0.23/1.42  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # ...remaining for further processing  : 58
% 0.23/1.42  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Backward-rewritten                   : 4
% 0.23/1.42  # Generated clauses                    : 55
% 0.23/1.42  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 46
% 0.23/1.42  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.23/1.42  # Paramodulations                      : 55
% 0.23/1.42  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of processed clauses  : 54
% 0.23/1.42  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 17
% 0.23/1.42  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.42  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.23/1.42  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 34
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 30
% 0.23/1.42  # ...number of literals in the above   : 62
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of archived clauses   : 4
% 0.23/1.42  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 165
% 0.23/1.42  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 51
% 0.23/1.42  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 0.23/1.42  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 74
% 0.23/1.42  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 0.23/1.42  # BW rewrite match successes           : 3
% 0.23/1.42  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 5630
% 0.23/1.42  
% 0.23/1.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.42  # User time                : 0.020 s
% 0.23/1.42  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.23/1.42  # Total time               : 0.022 s
% 0.23/1.42  # Maximum resident set size: 3024 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------