TSTP Solution File: SET660+3 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SET660+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:19:53 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.77s 1.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.14 % Problem : SET660+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.14/0.15 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 05:50:57 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.40 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.15/0.40 The process was started by sandbox on n028.cluster.edu,
% 0.15/0.40 Sun Jul 10 05:50:57 2022
% 0.15/0.40 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 8017.
% 0.15/0.40
% 0.15/0.40 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.15/0.40 set(auto).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.15/0.40 clear(print_given).
% 0.15/0.40
% 0.15/0.40 formula_list(usable).
% 0.15/0.40
% 0.15/0.40 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=7.
% 0.15/0.40
% 0.15/0.40 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.15/0.40 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.15/0.40 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.15/0.40 clauses in usable.
% 0.15/0.40
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.15/0.40
% 0.15/0.40 ------------> process usable:
% 0.15/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 3 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ilf_type(A,set_type)| -ilf_type(B,set_type)| -ilf_type(C,binary_relation_type)| -member(ordered_pair(A,B),C)|member(B,range_of(C)).
% 0.15/0.40
% 0.15/0.40 ------------> process sos:
% 0.15/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 124 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ilf_type($c5,set_type).
% 0.15/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 124 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ilf_type($c4,set_type).
% 0.15/0.40 124 back subsumes 109.
% 0.15/0.40 124 back subsumes 108.
% 0.15/0.40 124 back subsumes 103.
% 0.15/0.40 124 back subsumes 95.
% 0.15/0.40 124 back subsumes 87.
% 0.15/0.40 124 back subsumes 86.
% 0.15/0.40 124 back subsumes 81.
% 0.15/0.40 124 back subsumes 72.
% 0.15/0.40 124 back subsumes 67.
% 0.15/0.40 124 back subsumes 65.
% 0.15/0.40 124 back subsumes 58.
% 0.15/0.40 124 back subsumes 53.
% 0.15/0.40 124 back subsumes 50.
% 0.15/0.40 124 back subsumes 49.
% 0.15/0.40 124 back subsumes 45.
% 0.15/0.40 124 back subsumes 41.
% 0.15/0.40 124 back subsumes 36.
% 0.15/0.40 124 back subsumes 32.
% 0.15/0.40 124 back subsumes 23.
% 0.15/0.40 124 back subsumes 22.
% 0.15/0.40 124 back subsumes 21.
% 0.15/0.40 124 back subsumes 20.
% 0.15/0.40 124 back subsumes 13.
% 0.15/0.40 124 back subsumes 6.
% 0.15/0.40 124 back subsumes 4.
% 0.15/0.40 124 back subsumes 1.
% 0.15/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 126 during input processing: 0 [copy,126,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.15/0.40 126 back subsumes 97.
% 0.15/0.40 126 back subsumes 96.
% 0.15/0.40 126 back subsumes 88.
% 0.15/0.40 126 back subsumes 85.
% 0.15/0.40 126 back subsumes 74.
% 0.15/0.40 126 back subsumes 73.
% 0.15/0.40
% 0.15/0.40 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.21/0.44 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.21/0.44 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.21/0.44 number of clauses in intial UL: 87
% 0.21/0.44 number of clauses initially in problem: 91
% 0.21/0.44 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 95
% 0.21/0.44 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 97
% 0.21/0.44 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 98
% 0.21/0.44 absolute distinct symbol count: 38
% 0.21/0.44 distinct predicate count: 6
% 0.21/0.44 distinct function count: 25
% 0.21/0.44 distinct constant count: 7
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.77/1.02
% 0.77/1.02 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.77/1.02
% 0.77/1.02 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.77/1.02
% 0.77/1.02 Model 2 [ 2 1 2489 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.77/1.02 ilf_type(A,set_type).
% 0.77/1.02
% 0.77/1.02 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 0.77/1.02 15 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 479.0 K.
% 0.77/1.02 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 0.77/1.02 sym_ent ( 304) 149 0 149 0 44.2 K
% 0.77/1.02 term ( 32) 16351 14485 1866 14 58.8 K
% 0.77/1.02 rel ( 40) 13038 10760 2278 13 89.5 K
% 0.77/1.02 term_ptr ( 16) 7587 3295 4292 375 72.9 K
% 0.77/1.02 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.77/1.02 fpa_head ( 24) 966 165 801 30 19.5 K
% 0.77/1.02 fpa_tree ( 56) 1139 1139 0 18 1.0 K
% 0.77/1.02 context (1288) 2339 2339 0 7 8.8 K
% 0.77/1.02 trail ( 24) 43290 43290 0 5 0.1 K
% 0.77/1.02 imd_tree ( 32) 14 3 11 3 0.4 K
% 0.77/1.02 imd_pos (4024) 82 82 0 3 11.8 K
% 0.77/1.02 is_tree ( 24) 932 327 605 123 17.1 K
% 0.77/1.02 is_pos (2424) 8642 8642 0 5 11.8 K
% 0.77/1.02 fsub_pos ( 16) 1476 1476 0 1 0.0 K
% 0.77/1.02 literal ( 32) 2027 1074 953 2 29.8 K
% 0.77/1.02 clause ( 88) 546 238 308 1 26.6 K
% 0.77/1.02 list ( 272) 46 39 7 2 2.4 K
% 0.77/1.02 clash_nd ( 80) 380 380 0 4 0.3 K
% 0.77/1.02 clause_ptr ( 16) 354 103 251 13 4.1 K
% 0.77/1.02 int_ptr ( 16) 1973 475 1498 4 23.5 K
% 0.77/1.02 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.77/1.02 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.77/1.02 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.77/1.02 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.77/1.02 formula( 40) 844 844 0 354 13.8 K
% 0.77/1.02 formula_ptr( 16) 36 36 0 36 0.6 K
% 0.77/1.02 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.77/1.02
% 0.77/1.02 ********** is_delete, can't find term.
% 0.77/1.02 time 0.00
% 0.77/1.02 post_process time 0.00
% 0.77/1.02 back demod time 0.00
% 0.77/1.02 back subsume 0.00
% 0.77/1.02 factor time 0.00
% 0.77/1.02 FINDER time 0.00
% 0.77/1.02 unindex time 0.00
% 0.77/1.02
% 0.77/1.02 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.77/1.02
% 0.77/1.02 true clauses given 3 (50.0%)
% 0.77/1.02 false clauses given 3
% 0.77/1.02
% 0.77/1.02 FALSE TRUE
% 0.77/1.02 3 1 0
% 0.77/1.02 5 0 1
% 0.77/1.02 6 1 3
% 0.77/1.02 7 6 1
% 0.77/1.02 8 1 2
% 0.77/1.02 9 3 1
% 0.77/1.02 11 3 0
% 0.77/1.02 12 1 5
% 0.77/1.02 13 9 10
% 0.77/1.02 15 10 8
% 0.77/1.02 17 0 4
% 0.77/1.02 19 0 2
% 0.77/1.02 tot: 35 37 (51.4% true)
% 0.77/1.02
% 0.77/1.02
% 0.77/1.02 Model 2 [ 2 1 2489 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.77/1.02
% 0.77/1.02 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 0.77/1.02 1:0 2:0 3:1 4:0 5:0 6:0 7:0 8:0 9:0 10:0
% 0.77/1.02 11:0 12:0 13:0 14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:0
% 0.77/1.02 21:0 22:0 23:0 24:0 25:0 26:0 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:0
% 0.77/1.02 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:0 35:0 36:0 37:0 38:0 39:5 40:0
% 0.77/1.02 41:0 42:0 43:0 44:0 45:0 46:0 47:0 48:0 49:0 50:0
% 0.77/1.02 51:0 52:0 53:0 54:0 55:0 56:0 57:0 58:0 59:0 60:0
% 0.77/1.02 61:0 62:0 63:0 64:0 65:0 66:0 67:0 68:0 69:0 70:0
% 0.77/1.02 71:0 72:0 73:1 74:1 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:0 79:0 80:0
% 0.77/1.02 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:1 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:0 90:0
% 0.77/1.02 91:0 92:0 93:0 94:0 95:0 96:1 97:1 98:0 99:0
% 0.77/1.02 All others: 68.
% 0.77/1.02
% 0.77/1.02 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 0.77/1.02
% 0.77/1.02 ********** is_delete, can't find term.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------