TSTP Solution File: SET658+3 by PyRes---1.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.3
% Problem  : SET658+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 04:39:26 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.84s 1.06s
% Output   : Refutation 0.84s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SET658+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jul  9 20:49:36 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.84/1.06  # Version:  1.3
% 0.84/1.06  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.84/1.06  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.84/1.06  fof(prove_relset_1_20,conjecture,(![B]:(ilf_type(B,binary_relation_type)=>ilf_type(B,relation_type(domain_of(B),range_of(B))))),input).
% 0.84/1.06  fof(c15,negated_conjecture,(~(![B]:(ilf_type(B,binary_relation_type)=>ilf_type(B,relation_type(domain_of(B),range_of(B)))))),inference(assume_negation,status(cth),[prove_relset_1_20])).
% 0.84/1.06  fof(c16,negated_conjecture,(?[B]:(ilf_type(B,binary_relation_type)&~ilf_type(B,relation_type(domain_of(B),range_of(B))))),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[c15])).
% 0.84/1.06  fof(c17,negated_conjecture,(?[X2]:(ilf_type(X2,binary_relation_type)&~ilf_type(X2,relation_type(domain_of(X2),range_of(X2))))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c16])).
% 0.84/1.06  fof(c18,negated_conjecture,(ilf_type(skolem0001,binary_relation_type)&~ilf_type(skolem0001,relation_type(domain_of(skolem0001),range_of(skolem0001)))),inference(skolemize,status(esa),[c17])).
% 0.84/1.06  cnf(c20,negated_conjecture,~ilf_type(skolem0001,relation_type(domain_of(skolem0001),range_of(skolem0001))),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c18])).
% 0.84/1.06  cnf(c19,negated_conjecture,ilf_type(skolem0001,binary_relation_type),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c18])).
% 0.84/1.06  fof(p28,axiom,(![B]:ilf_type(B,set_type)),input).
% 0.84/1.06  fof(c21,axiom,(![X3]:ilf_type(X3,set_type)),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[p28])).
% 0.84/1.06  cnf(c22,axiom,ilf_type(X74,set_type),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c21])).
% 0.84/1.06  fof(p15,axiom,(![B]:(ilf_type(B,set_type)=>subset(B,B))),input).
% 0.84/1.06  fof(c93,axiom,(![B]:(~ilf_type(B,set_type)|subset(B,B))),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[p15])).
% 0.84/1.06  fof(c94,axiom,(![X39]:(~ilf_type(X39,set_type)|subset(X39,X39))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c93])).
% 0.84/1.06  cnf(c95,axiom,~ilf_type(X83,set_type)|subset(X83,X83),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c94])).
% 0.84/1.06  cnf(c171,plain,subset(X84,X84),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c95, c22])).
% 0.84/1.06  fof(p1,axiom,(![B]:(ilf_type(B,set_type)=>(![C]:(ilf_type(C,binary_relation_type)=>(subset(domain_of(C),B)=>ilf_type(C,relation_type(B,range_of(C)))))))),input).
% 0.84/1.06  fof(c165,axiom,(![B]:(~ilf_type(B,set_type)|(![C]:(~ilf_type(C,binary_relation_type)|(~subset(domain_of(C),B)|ilf_type(C,relation_type(B,range_of(C)))))))),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[p1])).
% 0.84/1.06  fof(c167,axiom,(![X71]:(![X72]:(~ilf_type(X71,set_type)|(~ilf_type(X72,binary_relation_type)|(~subset(domain_of(X72),X71)|ilf_type(X72,relation_type(X71,range_of(X72)))))))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[fof(c166,axiom,(![X71]:(~ilf_type(X71,set_type)|(![X72]:(~ilf_type(X72,binary_relation_type)|(~subset(domain_of(X72),X71)|ilf_type(X72,relation_type(X71,range_of(X72)))))))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c165])).])).
% 0.84/1.06  cnf(c168,axiom,~ilf_type(X529,set_type)|~ilf_type(X530,binary_relation_type)|~subset(domain_of(X530),X529)|ilf_type(X530,relation_type(X529,range_of(X530))),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c167])).
% 0.84/1.06  cnf(c466,plain,~ilf_type(domain_of(X1007),set_type)|~ilf_type(X1007,binary_relation_type)|ilf_type(X1007,relation_type(domain_of(X1007),range_of(X1007))),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c168, c171])).
% 0.84/1.06  cnf(c859,plain,~ilf_type(X1008,binary_relation_type)|ilf_type(X1008,relation_type(domain_of(X1008),range_of(X1008))),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c466, c22])).
% 0.84/1.06  cnf(c867,plain,ilf_type(skolem0001,relation_type(domain_of(skolem0001),range_of(skolem0001))),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c859, c19])).
% 0.84/1.06  cnf(c873,plain,$false,inference(resolution,status(thm),[c867, c20])).
% 0.84/1.06  # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.84/1.06  
% 0.84/1.06  # Initial clauses    : 71
% 0.84/1.06  # Processed clauses  : 320
% 0.84/1.06  # Factors computed   : 2
% 0.84/1.06  # Resolvents computed: 708
% 0.84/1.06  # Tautologies deleted: 9
% 0.84/1.06  # Forward subsumed   : 146
% 0.84/1.06  # Backward subsumed  : 65
% 0.84/1.06  # -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.84/1.06  # User time          : 0.702 s
% 0.84/1.06  # System time        : 0.019 s
% 0.84/1.06  # Total time         : 0.722 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------