TSTP Solution File: SET658+3 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SET658+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:13:15 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.60s 2.31s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 23 ( 0 equ; 12 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1,plain,
( ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X2,range_of(X1)))
| ~ ilf_type(X1,binary_relation_type)
| ~ ilf_type(X2,set_type)
| ~ subset(domain_of(X1),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5q40t57p/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_51,plain,
ilf_type(X1,set_type),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5q40t57p/lgb.p',i_0_51) ).
cnf(i_0_26,plain,
( subset(X1,X1)
| ~ ilf_type(X1,set_type) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5q40t57p/lgb.p',i_0_26) ).
cnf(i_0_52,negated_conjecture,
~ ilf_type(esk13_0,relation_type(domain_of(esk13_0),range_of(esk13_0))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5q40t57p/lgb.p',i_0_52) ).
cnf(i_0_53,negated_conjecture,
ilf_type(esk13_0,binary_relation_type),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5q40t57p/lgb.p',i_0_53) ).
cnf(c_0_59,plain,
( ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X2,range_of(X1)))
| ~ ilf_type(X1,binary_relation_type)
| ~ ilf_type(X2,set_type)
| ~ subset(domain_of(X1),X2) ),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_60,plain,
ilf_type(X1,set_type),
i_0_51 ).
cnf(c_0_61,plain,
( subset(X1,X1)
| ~ ilf_type(X1,set_type) ),
i_0_26 ).
cnf(c_0_62,negated_conjecture,
~ ilf_type(esk13_0,relation_type(domain_of(esk13_0),range_of(esk13_0))),
i_0_52 ).
cnf(c_0_63,plain,
( ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X2,range_of(X1)))
| ~ subset(domain_of(X1),X2)
| ~ ilf_type(X1,binary_relation_type) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_59,c_0_60])]) ).
cnf(c_0_64,plain,
subset(X1,X1),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_60])]) ).
cnf(c_0_65,negated_conjecture,
ilf_type(esk13_0,binary_relation_type),
i_0_53 ).
cnf(c_0_66,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_62,c_0_63]),c_0_64]),c_0_65])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SET658+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jul 9 20:46:33 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.60/2.31 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.60/2.31 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.60/2.31 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.60/2.31 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y
% 7.60/2.31 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 7.60/2.31 #
% 7.60/2.31 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 7.60/2.31
% 7.60/2.31 # Proof found!
% 7.60/2.31 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.60/2.31 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.60/2.32 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.60/2.32
% 7.60/2.32 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.60/2.32 # User time : 0.023 s
% 7.60/2.32 # System time : 0.007 s
% 7.60/2.32 # Total time : 0.030 s
% 7.60/2.32 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.60/2.32
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------