TSTP Solution File: SET658+3 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SET658+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:23:17 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.16s 0.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   34 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   30 (  13   ~;  10   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (   1 sgn;  10   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_relset_1_20,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ilf_type(X1,binary_relation_type)
     => ilf_type(X1,relation_type(domain_of(X1),range_of(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.erOKrwRdRj/E---3.1_19841.p',prove_relset_1_20) ).

fof(p1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ilf_type(X1,set_type)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ilf_type(X2,binary_relation_type)
         => ( subset(domain_of(X2),X1)
           => ilf_type(X2,relation_type(X1,range_of(X2))) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.erOKrwRdRj/E---3.1_19841.p',p1) ).

fof(p28,axiom,
    ! [X1] : ilf_type(X1,set_type),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.erOKrwRdRj/E---3.1_19841.p',p28) ).

fof(p15,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ilf_type(X1,set_type)
     => subset(X1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.erOKrwRdRj/E---3.1_19841.p',p15) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ilf_type(X1,binary_relation_type)
       => ilf_type(X1,relation_type(domain_of(X1),range_of(X1))) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_relset_1_20]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X5,X6] :
      ( ~ ilf_type(X5,set_type)
      | ~ ilf_type(X6,binary_relation_type)
      | ~ subset(domain_of(X6),X5)
      | ilf_type(X6,relation_type(X5,range_of(X6))) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[p1])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X74] : ilf_type(X74,set_type),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[p28]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X38] :
      ( ~ ilf_type(X38,set_type)
      | subset(X38,X38) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[p15])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ilf_type(esk13_0,binary_relation_type)
    & ~ ilf_type(esk13_0,relation_type(domain_of(esk13_0),range_of(esk13_0))) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ilf_type(X2,relation_type(X1,range_of(X2)))
    | ~ ilf_type(X1,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(X2,binary_relation_type)
    | ~ subset(domain_of(X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ilf_type(X1,set_type),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X1)
    | ~ ilf_type(X1,set_type) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ilf_type(esk13_0,relation_type(domain_of(esk13_0),range_of(esk13_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X2,range_of(X1)))
    | ~ subset(domain_of(X1),X2)
    | ~ ilf_type(X1,binary_relation_type) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_10])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ilf_type(esk13_0,binary_relation_type),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.11  % Problem    : SET658+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.05/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 16:49:16 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.43  Running first-order model finding
% 0.16/0.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.erOKrwRdRj/E---3.1_19841.p
% 0.16/0.45  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.16/0.45  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.45  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.45  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.45  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 19974 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.45  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.16/0.45  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.45  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.45  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.45  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.45  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMF31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.45  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.45  # Starting G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S2U with 756s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45  # Starting new_bool_3 with 162s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45  # Starting new_bool_1 with 158s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45  # G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S2U with pid 19980 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.45  # Result found by G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S2U
% 0.16/0.45  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.45  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.45  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.45  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.45  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMF31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.45  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.45  # Starting G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S2U with 756s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.45  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.45  
% 0.16/0.45  # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.45  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.16/0.45  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.45  # Parsed axioms                        : 29
% 0.16/0.45  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.16/0.45  # Initial clauses                      : 53
% 0.16/0.45  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.16/0.45  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 52
% 0.16/0.45  # Processed clauses                    : 69
% 0.16/0.45  # ...of these trivial                  : 13
% 0.16/0.45  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.16/0.45  # ...remaining for further processing  : 56
% 0.16/0.45  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.16/0.45  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.16/0.45  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.16/0.45  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.16/0.45  # Generated clauses                    : 4
% 0.16/0.45  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.16/0.45  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.16/0.45  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.16/0.45  # Paramodulations                      : 4
% 0.16/0.45  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.16/0.45  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.16/0.45  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.16/0.45  # Total rewrite steps                  : 93
% 0.16/0.45  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.16/0.45  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.16/0.45  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.45  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.16/0.45  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.45  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.16/0.45  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45  # Current number of processed clauses  : 17
% 0.16/0.45  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 6
% 0.16/0.45  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.45  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.16/0.45  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 9
% 0.16/0.45  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 23
% 0.16/0.45  # ...number of literals in the above   : 54
% 0.16/0.45  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.16/0.45  # Current number of archived clauses   : 39
% 0.16/0.45  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 159
% 0.16/0.45  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 131
% 0.16/0.45  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 0.16/0.45  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.16/0.45  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.16/0.45  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.16/0.45  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.16/0.45  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.16/0.45  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.16/0.45  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 4448
% 0.16/0.45  
% 0.16/0.45  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.45  # User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.45  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.45  # Total time               : 0.008 s
% 0.16/0.45  # Maximum resident set size: 1872 pages
% 0.16/0.45  
% 0.16/0.45  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.45  # User time                : 0.021 s
% 0.16/0.45  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.16/0.45  # Total time               : 0.027 s
% 0.16/0.45  # Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages
% 0.16/0.45  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------