TSTP Solution File: SET658+3 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : SET658+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 14:35:05 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.59s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 34
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 47 ( 7 unt; 30 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 34 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 30 ( 13 ~; 10 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 43 ( 26 >; 17 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 25 ( 25 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 17 ( 1 sgn; 10 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
set_type: $i ).
tff(decl_23,type,
ilf_type: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_24,type,
binary_relation_type: $i ).
tff(decl_25,type,
domain_of: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_26,type,
subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_27,type,
range_of: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_28,type,
relation_type: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_29,type,
member: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_30,type,
ordered_pair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_31,type,
relation_like: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_32,type,
cross_product: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_33,type,
subset_type: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_34,type,
power_set: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_35,type,
member_type: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_36,type,
empty: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_37,type,
domain: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_38,type,
range: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_39,type,
esk1_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_40,type,
esk2_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_41,type,
esk3_0: $i ).
tff(decl_42,type,
esk4_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_43,type,
esk5_1: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_44,type,
esk6_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_45,type,
esk7_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_46,type,
esk8_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_47,type,
esk9_1: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_48,type,
esk10_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_49,type,
esk11_1: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_50,type,
esk12_1: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_51,type,
esk13_0: $i ).
fof(prove_relset_1_20,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ilf_type(X1,binary_relation_type)
=> ilf_type(X1,relation_type(domain_of(X1),range_of(X1))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_relset_1_20) ).
fof(p1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ilf_type(X1,set_type)
=> ! [X2] :
( ilf_type(X2,binary_relation_type)
=> ( subset(domain_of(X2),X1)
=> ilf_type(X2,relation_type(X1,range_of(X2))) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p1) ).
fof(p28,axiom,
! [X1] : ilf_type(X1,set_type),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p28) ).
fof(p15,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ilf_type(X1,set_type)
=> subset(X1,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p15) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ilf_type(X1,binary_relation_type)
=> ilf_type(X1,relation_type(domain_of(X1),range_of(X1))) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_relset_1_20]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X5,X6] :
( ~ ilf_type(X5,set_type)
| ~ ilf_type(X6,binary_relation_type)
| ~ subset(domain_of(X6),X5)
| ilf_type(X6,relation_type(X5,range_of(X6))) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[p1])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X74] : ilf_type(X74,set_type),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[p28]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X38] :
( ~ ilf_type(X38,set_type)
| subset(X38,X38) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[p15])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ilf_type(esk13_0,binary_relation_type)
& ~ ilf_type(esk13_0,relation_type(domain_of(esk13_0),range_of(esk13_0))) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ilf_type(X2,relation_type(X1,range_of(X2)))
| ~ ilf_type(X1,set_type)
| ~ ilf_type(X2,binary_relation_type)
| ~ subset(domain_of(X2),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
ilf_type(X1,set_type),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( subset(X1,X1)
| ~ ilf_type(X1,set_type) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ ilf_type(esk13_0,relation_type(domain_of(esk13_0),range_of(esk13_0))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X2,range_of(X1)))
| ~ subset(domain_of(X1),X2)
| ~ ilf_type(X1,binary_relation_type) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
subset(X1,X1),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
ilf_type(esk13_0,binary_relation_type),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : SET658+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 09:28:52 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.57 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.59 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.21/0.59 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.59 % Proof found
% 0.21/0.59 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.59 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.59 % Total time : 0.012000 s
% 0.21/0.59 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.21/0.59 % Total time : 0.015000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------