TSTP Solution File: SET654+3 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SET654+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:13:13 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.70s 2.26s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.70s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 21 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 19 RR)
% Number of literals : 54 ( 0 equ; 35 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_4,plain,
( ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X2,X3))
| ~ ilf_type(X2,set_type)
| ~ ilf_type(X3,set_type)
| ~ ilf_type(X4,set_type)
| ~ subset(range_of(X1),X3)
| ~ ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X2,X4)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4e4walt5/input.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(i_0_40,plain,
ilf_type(X1,set_type),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4e4walt5/input.p',i_0_40) ).
cnf(i_0_1,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ subset(X3,X2)
| ~ subset(X1,X3)
| ~ ilf_type(X2,set_type)
| ~ ilf_type(X3,set_type)
| ~ ilf_type(X1,set_type) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4e4walt5/input.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_2,plain,
( subset(range_of(X1),X2)
| ~ ilf_type(X3,set_type)
| ~ ilf_type(X2,set_type)
| ~ ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X3,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4e4walt5/input.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_43,negated_conjecture,
ilf_type(esk13_0,relation_type(esk12_0,esk10_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4e4walt5/input.p',i_0_43) ).
cnf(i_0_42,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk10_0,esk11_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4e4walt5/input.p',i_0_42) ).
cnf(i_0_41,negated_conjecture,
~ ilf_type(esk13_0,relation_type(esk12_0,esk11_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4e4walt5/input.p',i_0_41) ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
( ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X2,X3))
| ~ ilf_type(X2,set_type)
| ~ ilf_type(X3,set_type)
| ~ ilf_type(X4,set_type)
| ~ subset(range_of(X1),X3)
| ~ ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X2,X4)) ),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
ilf_type(X1,set_type),
i_0_40 ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ subset(X3,X2)
| ~ subset(X1,X3)
| ~ ilf_type(X2,set_type)
| ~ ilf_type(X3,set_type)
| ~ ilf_type(X1,set_type) ),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_54,plain,
( subset(range_of(X1),X2)
| ~ ilf_type(X3,set_type)
| ~ ilf_type(X2,set_type)
| ~ ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X3,X2)) ),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
( ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X2,X3))
| ~ subset(range_of(X1),X3)
| ~ ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X2,X4)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52]),c_0_52]),c_0_52])]) ).
cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
ilf_type(esk13_0,relation_type(esk12_0,esk10_0)),
i_0_43 ).
cnf(c_0_57,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ subset(X3,X2)
| ~ subset(X1,X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_52]),c_0_52]),c_0_52])]) ).
cnf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk10_0,esk11_0),
i_0_42 ).
cnf(c_0_59,plain,
( subset(range_of(X1),X2)
| ~ ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X3,X2)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_52]),c_0_52])]) ).
cnf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
( ilf_type(esk13_0,relation_type(esk12_0,X1))
| ~ subset(range_of(esk13_0),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_56]) ).
cnf(c_0_61,negated_conjecture,
( subset(X1,esk11_0)
| ~ subset(X1,esk10_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_58]) ).
cnf(c_0_62,negated_conjecture,
subset(range_of(esk13_0),esk10_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_59,c_0_56]) ).
cnf(c_0_63,negated_conjecture,
~ ilf_type(esk13_0,relation_type(esk12_0,esk11_0)),
i_0_41 ).
cnf(c_0_64,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_61]),c_0_62])]),c_0_63]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SET654+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jul 9 16:12:54 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.70/2.26 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 7.70/2.26 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.70/2.26 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.70/2.26 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 7.70/2.26 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 7.70/2.26 #
% 7.70/2.26 # Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 7.70/2.26 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.70/2.26
% 7.70/2.26 # Proof found!
% 7.70/2.26 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.70/2.26 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.70/2.26 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.70/2.26
% 7.70/2.26 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.70/2.26 # User time : 0.022 s
% 7.70/2.26 # System time : 0.003 s
% 7.70/2.26 # Total time : 0.025 s
% 7.70/2.26 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 7.70/2.26
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------