TSTP Solution File: SET653+3 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : SET653+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 01:01:46 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SET653+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 23:06:05 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.37  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.37  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_C36_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.21/0.37  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 0.21/0.37  #
% 0.21/0.37  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.37  # Number of axioms: 46 Number of unprocessed: 32
% 0.21/0.37  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.21/0.37  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.21/0.37  # Hello from C++
% 0.21/0.38  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.21/0.38  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.21/0.38  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.21/0.38  # 32 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.21/0.38  # Creating start rules for all 3 conjectures.
% 0.21/0.38  # There are 3 start rule candidates:
% 0.21/0.38  # Found 8 unit axioms.
% 0.21/0.38  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.21/0.38  # 3 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.21/0.38  # 24 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.21/0.38  # 8 unit axiom clauses
% 0.21/0.38  
% 0.21/0.38  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.21/0.38  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 3
% 0.21/0.38  # Returning from population with 9 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.21/0.38  # We now have 9 tableaux to operate on
% 0.21/0.38  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.21/0.38  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.21/0.38  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.21/0.38  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.21/0.38  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.21/0.38  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.21/0.38  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.21/0.38  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.21/0.38  # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.38  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.38  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.21/0.38  
% 0.21/0.38  # End clausification derivation
% 0.21/0.38  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_42, negated_conjecture, (subset(esk10_0,esk11_0))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_40, plain, (ilf_type(X1,set_type))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_43, negated_conjecture, (ilf_type(esk13_0,relation_type(esk10_0,esk12_0)))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (subset(X1,X1))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (ilf_type(esk3_1(X1),subset_type(X1)))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_7, plain, (ilf_type(esk1_2(X1,X2),relation_type(X2,X1)))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_41, negated_conjecture, (~ilf_type(esk13_0,relation_type(esk11_0,esk12_0)))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (~empty(power_set(X1)))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_37, plain, (relation_like(X1)|~empty(X1))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_28, plain, (empty(X1)|member(esk6_1(X1),X1))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_32, plain, (relation_like(X1)|member(esk9_1(X1),X1))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_27, plain, (empty(X1)|ilf_type(esk5_1(X1),member_type(X1)))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_3, plain, (subset(domain_of(X1),X2)|~ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X2,X3)))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_2, plain, (subset(range_of(X1),X2)|~ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X3,X2)))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_30, plain, (~empty(X1)|~member(X2,X1))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_25, plain, (ilf_type(X1,member_type(X2))|~member(X1,X2))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_9, plain, (member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X1)|subset(X1,X2))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_8, plain, (subset(X1,X2)|~member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_5, plain, (ilf_type(X1,subset_type(cross_product(X2,X3)))|~ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X2,X3)))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_1, plain, (subset(X1,X2)|~subset(X3,X2)|~subset(X1,X3))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_6, plain, (ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X2,X3))|~ilf_type(X1,subset_type(cross_product(X2,X3))))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (empty(X1)|member(X2,X1)|~ilf_type(X2,member_type(X1)))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_38, plain, (relation_like(X1)|~ilf_type(X1,subset_type(cross_product(X2,X3))))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_31, plain, (relation_like(X1)|esk9_1(X1)!=ordered_pair(X2,X3))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (ilf_type(X1,member_type(power_set(X2)))|~ilf_type(X1,subset_type(X2)))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (ilf_type(X1,subset_type(X2))|~ilf_type(X1,member_type(power_set(X2))))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X2,X3))|~subset(domain_of(X1),X2)|~ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X4,X3)))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (member(esk4_2(X1,X2),X1)|member(X1,power_set(X2)))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (member(X1,power_set(X2))|~member(esk4_2(X1,X2),X2))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_11, plain, (member(X1,X2)|~member(X1,X3)|~subset(X3,X2))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (member(X1,X2)|~member(X3,power_set(X2))|~member(X1,X3))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_34, plain, (ordered_pair(esk7_2(X1,X2),esk8_2(X1,X2))=X2|~relation_like(X1)|~member(X2,X1))).
% 0.21/0.38  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.21/0.38  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.21/0.38  # Found 8 steps
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_42, negated_conjecture, (subset(esk10_0,esk11_0)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_49, plain, (subset(esk10_0,esk11_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_1])).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_180, plain, (subset(esk10_0,esk11_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_1])).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_181, plain, (~subset(esk11_0,esk11_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_18])).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_234, plain, (subset(domain_of(esk13_0),esk11_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_272, plain, (ilf_type(esk13_0,relation_type(esk11_0,esk12_0))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_41])).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_274, plain, (~ilf_type(esk13_0,relation_type(esk10_0,esk12_0))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_43])).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_236, plain, (~subset(domain_of(esk13_0),esk10_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_236, ...])).
% 0.21/0.38  # End printing tableau
% 0.21/0.38  # SZS output end
% 0.21/0.38  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.21/0.38  # Child (12003) has found a proof.
% 0.21/0.38  
% 0.21/0.38  # Proof search is over...
% 0.21/0.38  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------