TSTP Solution File: SET651+3 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SET651+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:19:49 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 187.25s 187.43s
% Output   : Refutation 187.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : SET651+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 08:11:38 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.38  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.38  The process was started by sandbox on n019.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.38  Mon Jul 11 08:11:38 2022
% 0.13/0.38  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 5299.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.38  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.38  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=7.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.38  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.38  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.38  clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 92 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ilf_type($c5,set_type).
% 0.13/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 92 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ilf_type($c4,set_type).
% 0.13/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 92 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ilf_type($c3,set_type).
% 0.13/0.38  92 back subsumes 76.
% 0.13/0.38  92 back subsumes 75.
% 0.13/0.38  92 back subsumes 70.
% 0.13/0.38  92 back subsumes 64.
% 0.13/0.38  92 back subsumes 63.
% 0.13/0.38  92 back subsumes 44.
% 0.13/0.38  92 back subsumes 39.
% 0.13/0.38  92 back subsumes 36.
% 0.13/0.38  92 back subsumes 35.
% 0.13/0.38  92 back subsumes 31.
% 0.13/0.38  92 back subsumes 27.
% 0.13/0.38  92 back subsumes 19.
% 0.13/0.38  92 back subsumes 18.
% 0.13/0.38  92 back subsumes 17.
% 0.13/0.38  92 back subsumes 14.
% 0.13/0.38  92 back subsumes 12.
% 0.13/0.38  92 back subsumes 9.
% 0.13/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 95 during input processing: 0 [copy,95,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.42  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.42  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.42  number of clauses in intial UL: 72
% 0.20/0.42  number of clauses initially in problem: 77
% 0.20/0.42  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 93
% 0.20/0.42  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 93
% 0.20/0.42  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.42  absolute distinct symbol count: 31
% 0.20/0.42     distinct predicate count: 6
% 0.20/0.42     distinct function count: 18
% 0.20/0.42     distinct constant count: 7
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  =========== start of search ===========
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Changing weight limit from 60 to 20.
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Model 4 [ 3 0 723 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Model 5 [ 2 1 2023 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Model 6 [ 2 1 12250 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Model 7 [ 2 1 6296 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Model 8 [ 2 1 9928 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Model 9 [ 1 3 43316 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Model 10 [ 4 1 616 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Model 11 [ 3 0 945 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Model 12 [ 11 1 2273 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Model 13 [ 3 0 1044 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Model 14 [ 4 1 7297 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Model 15 [ 17 0 1246 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Model 16 [ 9 1 2652 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Model 17 [ 12 0 260 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Model 18 [ 18 1 4475 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Model 19 [ 23 1 363 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Model 20 [ 4 1 3654 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Model 21 [ 6 1 7080 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Model 22 [ 2 2 14888 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Model 23 [ 23 1 5018 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Model 24 [ 24 1 316 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Model 25 [ 32 0 3580 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Model 26 [ 19 1 2812 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.55  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.55  
% 6.32/6.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.56  
% 6.32/6.56  Model 27 [ 16 1 11377 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.32/6.56  
% 6.32/6.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.56  
% 6.32/6.56  Model 28 [ 26 0 184 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.32/6.56  
% 6.32/6.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.56  
% 6.32/6.56  Model 29 [ 9 0 1803 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.32/6.56  
% 6.32/6.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.56  
% 6.32/6.56  Model 30 [ 36 1 4828 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.32/6.56  
% 6.32/6.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.56  
% 6.32/6.56  Model 31 [ 15 1 992 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.32/6.56  
% 6.32/6.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.56  
% 6.32/6.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.56  
% 6.32/6.56  Model 32 [ 36 0 1410 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.32/6.56  
% 6.32/6.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.56  
% 6.32/6.56  Model 33 [ 46 1 2848 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.32/6.56  
% 6.32/6.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.32/6.56  
% 6.32/6.56  Model 34 [ 21 1 1013 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.32/6.56  
% 6.32/6.56  Resetting weight limit to 20 after 90 givens.
% 6.32/6.56  
% 6.41/6.63  
% 6.41/6.63  
% 6.41/6.63  Changing weight limit from 20 to 18.
% 6.41/6.63  
% 6.41/6.63  Resetting weight limit to 18 after 95 givens.
% 6.41/6.63  
% 6.51/6.69  
% 6.51/6.69  
% 6.51/6.69  Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 6.51/6.69  
% 6.51/6.69  Resetting weight limit to 17 after 100 givens.
% 6.51/6.69  
% 6.54/6.76  
% 6.54/6.76  
% 6.54/6.76  Changing weight limit from 17 to 16.
% 6.54/6.76  
% 6.54/6.76  Resetting weight limit to 16 after 105 givens.
% 6.54/6.76  
% 187.25/187.43  
% 187.25/187.43  -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! -- 
% 187.25/187.43  
% 187.25/187.43  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 187.25/187.43  
% 187.25/187.43  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 187.25/187.43  
% 187.25/187.43  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 187.25/187.43  
% 187.25/187.43  Model 35 [ 28 2 5614 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 187.25/187.43  
% 187.25/187.43  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 187.25/187.43  
% 187.25/187.43  Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 187.25/187.43  
% 187.25/187.43  
% 187.25/187.43  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 169.15 sec ----> 106772 [binary,106771.1,47.1] {+} $F.
% 187.25/187.43  
% 187.25/187.43  Length of proof is 30.  Level of proof is 15.
% 187.25/187.43  
% 187.25/187.43  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 187.25/187.43  % SZS status Theorem
% 187.25/187.43  % SZS output start Refutation
% 187.25/187.43  
% 187.25/187.43  1 [] {+} -ilf_type(A,set_type)| -ilf_type(B,set_type)| -ilf_type(C,set_type)| -subset(A,B)| -subset(B,C)|subset(A,C).
% 187.25/187.43  2 [] {+} -ilf_type(A,binary_relation_type)|subset(A,cross_product(domain_of(A),range_of(A))).
% 187.25/187.43  3 [] {+} -ilf_type(A,set_type)| -ilf_type(B,set_type)| -ilf_type(C,set_type)| -ilf_type(D,set_type)| -subset(A,B)| -subset(C,D)|subset(cross_product(A,C),cross_product(B,D)).
% 187.25/187.43  4 [] {+} -ilf_type(A,set_type)| -ilf_type(B,set_type)| -ilf_type(C,subset_type(cross_product(A,B)))|ilf_type(C,relation_type(A,B)).
% 187.25/187.43  5 [] {+} -ilf_type(A,set_type)| -ilf_type(B,set_type)| -ilf_type(C,relation_type(A,B))|ilf_type(C,subset_type(cross_product(A,B))).
% 187.25/187.43  8 [] {+} -ilf_type(A,set_type)| -ilf_type(B,set_type)| -ilf_type(C,relation_type(A,B))|subset(range_of(C),B).
% 187.25/187.43  13 [] {+} -ilf_type(A,set_type)| -ilf_type(B,set_type)| -subset(A,B)| -ilf_type(C,set_type)| -member(C,A)|member(C,B).
% 187.25/187.43  21 [] {+} -ilf_type(A,set_type)|ilf_type(A,binary_relation_type)| -relation_like(A).
% 187.25/187.43  22 [] {+} -ilf_type(A,set_type)| -ilf_type(B,set_type)| -ilf_type(B,subset_type(A))|ilf_type(B,member_type(power_set(A))).
% 187.25/187.43  23 [] {+} -ilf_type(A,set_type)| -ilf_type(B,set_type)|ilf_type(B,subset_type(A))| -ilf_type(B,member_type(power_set(A))).
% 187.25/187.43  24 [] {+} -ilf_type(A,set_type)|ilf_type($f4(A),subset_type(A)).
% 187.25/187.43  25 [] {+} -ilf_type(A,set_type)|subset(A,A).
% 187.25/187.43  26 [] {+} -ilf_type(A,set_type)| -ilf_type(B,set_type)| -member(A,power_set(B))| -ilf_type(C,set_type)| -member(C,A)|member(C,B).
% 187.25/187.43  28 [] {+} -ilf_type(A,set_type)| -ilf_type(B,set_type)|member(A,power_set(B))|member($f5(A,B),A).
% 187.25/187.43  29 [] {+} -ilf_type(A,set_type)| -ilf_type(B,set_type)|member(A,power_set(B))| -member($f5(A,B),B).
% 187.25/187.43  32 [] {+} -ilf_type(A,set_type)|empty(B)| -ilf_type(B,set_type)| -ilf_type(A,member_type(B))|member(A,B).
% 187.25/187.43  33 [] {+} -ilf_type(A,set_type)|empty(B)| -ilf_type(B,set_type)|ilf_type(A,member_type(B))| -member(A,B).
% 187.25/187.43  42 [] {+} -ilf_type(A,set_type)| -ilf_type(B,set_type)| -ilf_type(C,subset_type(cross_product(A,B)))|relation_like(C).
% 187.25/187.43  43 [] {+} -ilf_type(A,set_type)| -empty(A)| -ilf_type(B,set_type)| -member(B,A).
% 187.25/187.43  47 [] {+} -ilf_type($c2,relation_type($c4,$c3)).
% 187.25/187.43  48 [factor,3.1.2] {+} -ilf_type(A,set_type)| -ilf_type(B,set_type)| -ilf_type(C,set_type)| -subset(A,A)| -subset(B,C)|subset(cross_product(A,B),cross_product(A,C)).
% 187.25/187.43  53 [factor,3.3.4] {+} -ilf_type(A,set_type)| -ilf_type(B,set_type)| -ilf_type(C,set_type)| -subset(A,B)| -subset(C,C)|subset(cross_product(A,C),cross_product(B,C)).
% 187.25/187.43  72 [factor,29.1.2] {+} -ilf_type(A,set_type)|member(A,power_set(A))| -member($f5(A,A),A).
% 187.25/187.43  92 [] {+} ilf_type(A,set_type).
% 187.25/187.43  93 [] {-} ilf_type($c2,relation_type($c5,$c3)).
% 187.25/187.43  94 [] {+} subset(domain_of($c2),$c4).
% 187.25/187.43  102 [hyper,92,28,92] {+} member(A,power_set(B))|member($f5(A,B),A).
% 187.25/187.43  103 [hyper,92,25] {+} subset(A,A).
% 187.25/187.43  104 [hyper,92,24] {-} ilf_type($f4(A),subset_type(A)).
% 187.25/187.43  113 [hyper,103,53,92,92,92,94] {-} subset(cross_product(domain_of($c2),A),cross_product($c4,A)).
% 187.25/187.43  115 [hyper,93,8,92,92] {+} subset(range_of($c2),$c3).
% 187.25/187.43  117 [hyper,93,5,92,92] {-} ilf_type($c2,subset_type(cross_product($c5,$c3))).
% 187.25/187.43  121 [hyper,104,22,92,92] {+} ilf_type($f4(A),member_type(power_set(A))).
% 187.25/187.43  130 [hyper,115,48,92,92,92,103] {-} subset(cross_product(A,range_of($c2)),cross_product(A,$c3)).
% 187.25/187.43  159 [hyper,117,42,92,92] {+} relation_like($c2).
% 187.25/187.43  161 [hyper,121,32,92,92] {-} empty(power_set(A))|member($f4(A),power_set(A)).
% 187.25/187.43  163 [hyper,159,21,92] {-} ilf_type($c2,binary_relation_type).
% 187.25/187.43  166 [hyper,163,2] {-} subset($c2,cross_product(domain_of($c2),range_of($c2))).
% 187.25/187.43  282 [hyper,102,72,92,factor_simp] {-} member(A,power_set(A)).
% 187.25/187.43  788 [hyper,113,1,92,92,92,166] {-} subset($c2,cross_product($c4,range_of($c2))).
% 187.25/187.43  1095 [hyper,130,1,92,92,92,788] {-} subset($c2,cross_product($c4,$c3)).
% 187.25/187.43  1140 [hyper,1095,13,92,92,92,102] {-} member($f5($c2,A),cross_product($c4,$c3))|member($c2,power_set(A)).
% 187.25/187.43  2288 [hyper,161,43,92,92,282] {+} member($f4(A),power_set(A)).
% 187.25/187.43  2407 [hyper,2288,26,92,92,92,102] {+} member($f5($f4(A),B),A)|member($f4(A),power_set(B)).
% 187.25/187.43  20984 [hyper,1140,29,92,92,factor_simp] {-} member($c2,power_set(cross_product($c4,$c3))).
% 187.25/187.43  20994 [hyper,20984,33,92,92] {+} empty(power_set(cross_product($c4,$c3)))|ilf_type($c2,member_type(power_set(cross_product($c4,$c3)))).
% 187.25/187.43  40988 [hyper,2407,26,92,92,20984,92] {-} member($f4($c2),power_set(A))|member($f5($f4($c2),A),cross_product($c4,$c3)).
% 187.25/187.43  41005 [hyper,40988,29,92,92,factor_simp] {-} member($f4($c2),power_set(cross_product($c4,$c3))).
% 187.25/187.43  41091 [hyper,41005,26,92,92,92,2407] {-} member($f5($f4($f4($c2)),A),cross_product($c4,$c3))|member($f4($f4($c2)),power_set(A)).
% 187.25/187.43  103114 [hyper,41091,29,92,92,factor_simp] {-} member($f4($f4($c2)),power_set(cross_product($c4,$c3))).
% 187.25/187.43  106755 [hyper,20994,43,92,92,103114] {+} ilf_type($c2,member_type(power_set(cross_product($c4,$c3)))).
% 187.25/187.43  106770 [hyper,106755,23,92,92] {-} ilf_type($c2,subset_type(cross_product($c4,$c3))).
% 187.25/187.43  106771 [hyper,106770,4,92,92] {-} ilf_type($c2,relation_type($c4,$c3)).
% 187.25/187.43  106772 [binary,106771.1,47.1] {+} $F.
% 187.25/187.43  
% 187.25/187.43  % SZS output end Refutation
% 187.25/187.43  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 187.25/187.43  
% 187.25/187.43  
% 187.25/187.43  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 187.25/187.43  
% 187.25/187.43  
% 187.25/187.43  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 187.25/187.43  
% 187.25/187.43  ============ end of search ============
% 187.25/187.43  
% 187.25/187.43  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 187.25/187.43  
% 187.25/187.43  true clauses given        2098      (35.3%)
% 187.25/187.43  false clauses given       3852
% 187.25/187.43  
% 187.25/187.43        FALSE     TRUE
% 187.25/187.43    12  0         654
% 187.25/187.43    13  0         1642
% 187.25/187.43    14  0         199
% 187.25/187.43    15  752       5
% 187.25/187.43    16  1712      0
% 187.25/187.43  tot:  2464      2500      (50.4% true)
% 187.25/187.43  
% 187.25/187.43  
% 187.25/187.43  Model 35 [ 28 -50 5614 ] (0.02 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 187.25/187.43  
% 187.25/187.43  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 187.25/187.43  
% 187.25/187.43  Process 5299 finished Mon Jul 11 08:14:45 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------