TSTP Solution File: SET649+3 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SET649+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:11:17 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.56s 0.74s
% Output   : Refutation 0.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   37 (  18 unt;   4 nHn;  32 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   84 (   0 equ;  50 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   50 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Z,set_type)
    | ~ subset(X,Y)
    | ~ subset(Y,Z)
    | subset(X,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p1) ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,binary_relation_type)
    | subset(X,cross_product(domain_of(X),range_of(X))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2) ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Z,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(U,set_type)
    | ~ subset(X,Y)
    | ~ subset(Z,U)
    | subset(cross_product(X,Z),cross_product(Y,U)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p3) ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Z,subset_type(cross_product(X,Y)))
    | ilf_type(Z,relation_type(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p4) ).

cnf(18,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ subset(X,Y)
    | ~ ilf_type(Z,set_type)
    | ~ member(Z,X)
    | member(Z,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p12) ).

cnf(25,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ilf_type(Y,subset_type(X))
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,member_type(power_set(X))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p15) ).

cnf(27,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | subset(X,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p17) ).

cnf(37,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | member(X,power_set(Y))
    | member('SKOLEMAAAW10'(X,Y),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p20) ).

cnf(38,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | member(X,power_set(Y))
    | ~ member('SKOLEMAAAW10'(X,Y),Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p20) ).

cnf(39,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ empty(power_set(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p21) ).

cnf(42,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | empty(Y)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ilf_type(X,member_type(Y))
    | ~ member(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p22) ).

cnf(48,axiom,
    ilf_type(X,set_type),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p26) ).

cnf(49,negated_conjecture,
    ilf_type('SKOLEMAAAW15',binary_relation_type),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_relset_1_11) ).

cnf(50,negated_conjecture,
    subset(domain_of('SKOLEMAAAW15'),'SKOLEMAAAW13'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_relset_1_11) ).

cnf(51,negated_conjecture,
    subset(range_of('SKOLEMAAAW15'),'SKOLEMAAAW14'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_relset_1_11) ).

cnf(52,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ilf_type('SKOLEMAAAW15',relation_type('SKOLEMAAAW13','SKOLEMAAAW14')),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_relset_1_11) ).

cnf(57,plain,
    ( ~ subset(X,Y)
    | ~ subset(Y,Z)
    | subset(X,Z) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1,48]) ).

cnf(58,plain,
    ( ~ subset(X,Y)
    | ~ subset(Z,U)
    | subset(cross_product(X,Z),cross_product(Y,U)) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[3,48]) ).

cnf(59,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,subset_type(cross_product(Y,Z)))
    | ilf_type(X,relation_type(Y,Z)) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[4,48]) ).

cnf(64,plain,
    ( ~ subset(X,Y)
    | ~ member(Z,X)
    | member(Z,Y) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[18,48]) ).

cnf(68,plain,
    ( ilf_type(X,subset_type(Y))
    | ~ ilf_type(X,member_type(power_set(Y))) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[25,48]) ).

cnf(70,plain,
    subset(X,X),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[27,48]) ).

cnf(76,plain,
    ( member(X,power_set(Y))
    | member('SKOLEMAAAW10'(X,Y),X) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[37,48]) ).

cnf(77,plain,
    ( member(X,power_set(Y))
    | ~ member('SKOLEMAAAW10'(X,Y),Y) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[38,48]) ).

cnf(78,plain,
    ~ empty(power_set(X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[39,48]) ).

cnf(80,plain,
    ( empty(X)
    | ilf_type(Y,member_type(X))
    | ~ member(Y,X) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[42,48]) ).

cnf(110,plain,
    subset('SKOLEMAAAW15',cross_product(domain_of('SKOLEMAAAW15'),range_of('SKOLEMAAAW15'))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[2,49]) ).

cnf(122,plain,
    ~ ilf_type('SKOLEMAAAW15',subset_type(cross_product('SKOLEMAAAW13','SKOLEMAAAW14'))),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[59,52]) ).

cnf(126,plain,
    subset(cross_product(domain_of('SKOLEMAAAW15'),X),cross_product('SKOLEMAAAW13',X)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[58,50,70]) ).

cnf(127,plain,
    subset(cross_product(X,range_of('SKOLEMAAAW15')),cross_product(X,'SKOLEMAAAW14')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[58,70,51]) ).

cnf(189,plain,
    ~ ilf_type('SKOLEMAAAW15',member_type(power_set(cross_product('SKOLEMAAAW13','SKOLEMAAAW14')))),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[68,122]) ).

cnf(273,plain,
    subset('SKOLEMAAAW15',cross_product('SKOLEMAAAW13',range_of('SKOLEMAAAW15'))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[57,126,110]) ).

cnf(316,plain,
    subset('SKOLEMAAAW15',cross_product('SKOLEMAAAW13','SKOLEMAAAW14')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[57,127,273]) ).

cnf(579,plain,
    ~ member('SKOLEMAAAW15',power_set(cross_product('SKOLEMAAAW13','SKOLEMAAAW14'))),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[80,189,78]) ).

cnf(581,plain,
    member('SKOLEMAAAW10'('SKOLEMAAAW15',cross_product('SKOLEMAAAW13','SKOLEMAAAW14')),'SKOLEMAAAW15'),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[76,579]) ).

cnf(584,plain,
    ~ member('SKOLEMAAAW10'('SKOLEMAAAW15',cross_product('SKOLEMAAAW13','SKOLEMAAAW14')),cross_product('SKOLEMAAAW13','SKOLEMAAAW14')),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[77,579]) ).

cnf(864,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[64,581,316]),584]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SET649+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 19:58:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  "."
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-10T19:58:08
% 0.19/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n019.cluster.edu at 2022-07-10T19:58:08
% 0.56/0.74  
% 0.56/0.74  
% 0.56/0.74  #||
% 0.56/0.74  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/0.74  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.56/0.75  ||#
% 0.56/0.75  
% 0.56/0.75  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.56/0.75  ;      1450 formulas have been input or derived (from 94 formulas).
% 0.56/0.75  ;       864 (60%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.56/0.75  ;           55 ( 6%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.56/0.75  ;          809 (94%) are still being kept.
% 0.56/0.75  ; 
% 0.56/0.75  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.009   3%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.002   1%   Assert                       (27 calls)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.096  36%   Process new row              (1,325 calls)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.025   9%   Resolution                   (186 calls)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.001   0%   Paramodulation               (93 calls)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (16 calls)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.004   1%   Condensing                   (594 calls)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.048  18%   Forward subsumption          (594 calls)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.018   7%   Backward subsumption         (537 calls)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.005   2%   Clause clause subsumption    (4,877 calls)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.021   8%   Forward simplification       (1,325 calls)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.006   2%   Backward simplification      (864 calls)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.003   1%   Ordering                     (1,026 calls)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.031  12%   Other
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.269        Total
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.271        Real time
% 0.56/0.75  ; 
% 0.56/0.75  ; Term-hash-array has 1,901 terms in all.
% 0.56/0.75  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 482 entries (492 at peak, 537 added, 55 deleted).
% 0.56/0.75  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 3,092 nodes (3,157 at peak, 3,319 added, 227 deleted).
% 0.56/0.75  ;  Retrieved 4,214 possibly forward subsuming rows in 594 calls.
% 0.56/0.75  ;  Retrieved 919 possibly backward subsumed rows in 537 calls.
% 0.56/0.75  ; Path-index has 1,879 entries (1,879 at peak, 1,980 added, 101 deleted).
% 0.56/0.75  ; Path-index has 3,611 nodes (3,611 at peak, 3,724 added, 113 deleted).
% 0.56/0.75  ; Trie-index has 1,879 entries (1,879 at peak, 1,980 added, 101 deleted).
% 0.56/0.75  ; Trie-index has 7,178 nodes (7,178 at peak, 7,419 added, 241 deleted).
% 0.56/0.75  ; Retrieved 2,350 generalization terms in 2,025 calls.
% 0.56/0.75  ; Retrieved 364 instance terms in 326 calls.
% 0.56/0.75  ; Retrieved 20,856 unifiable terms in 1,382 calls.
% 0.56/0.75  ; 
% 0.56/0.75  ; The agenda of rows to process has 11 entries:
% 0.56/0.75  ;     4 with value 18              1 with value 22               1 with value 29
% 0.56/0.75  ;     3 with value 19              2 with value 24
% 0.56/0.75  ; The agenda of rows to give has 715 entries:
% 0.56/0.75  ;     1 with value (4 8)          91 with value (4 23)           7 with value (4 37)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     2 with value (4 12)         75 with value (4 24)           6 with value (4 39)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     6 with value (4 13)         64 with value (4 25)           1 with value (4 40)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     6 with value (4 15)         49 with value (4 26)           2 with value (4 41)
% 0.56/0.75  ;    14 with value (4 16)         42 with value (4 27)           2 with value (4 42)
% 0.56/0.75  ;    24 with value (4 17)         25 with value (4 28)          10 with value (4 43)
% 0.56/0.75  ;    30 with value (4 18)         13 with value (4 29)           3 with value (4 47)
% 0.56/0.75  ;    49 with value (4 19)          3 with value (4 30)           1 with value (4 48)
% 0.56/0.75  ;    54 with value (4 20)          2 with value (4 32)           6 with value (4 51)
% 0.56/0.75  ;    37 with value (4 21)          3 with value (4 35)           2 with value (4 55)
% 0.56/0.75  ;    85 with value (4 22)
% 0.56/0.75  Evaluation took:
% 0.56/0.75    0.272 seconds of real time
% 0.56/0.75    0.23562 seconds of user run time
% 0.56/0.75    0.035842 seconds of system run time
% 0.56/0.75    [Run times include 0.015 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.56/0.75    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.56/0.75    0 page faults and
% 0.56/0.75    21,633,544 bytes consed.
% 0.56/0.75  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.56/0.75  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-10T19:58:08
% 0.56/0.75  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.56/0.75  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------