TSTP Solution File: SET643+3 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SET643+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:23:13 EDT 2023

% Result   : Timeout 0.30s 300.10s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   38 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   36 (  14   ~;  11   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (   1 sgn;  14   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_relset_1_5,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ilf_type(X1,set_type)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ilf_type(X2,set_type)
         => ilf_type(cross_product(X1,X2),relation_type(X1,X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bPLIUFOwED/E---3.1_13427.p',prove_relset_1_5) ).

fof(p1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ilf_type(X1,set_type)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ilf_type(X2,set_type)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( ilf_type(X3,set_type)
             => ( subset(X1,cross_product(X2,X3))
               => ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X2,X3)) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bPLIUFOwED/E---3.1_13427.p',p1) ).

fof(p19,axiom,
    ! [X1] : ilf_type(X1,set_type),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bPLIUFOwED/E---3.1_13427.p',p19) ).

fof(p10,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ilf_type(X1,set_type)
     => subset(X1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bPLIUFOwED/E---3.1_13427.p',p10) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ilf_type(X1,set_type)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ilf_type(X2,set_type)
           => ilf_type(cross_product(X1,X2),relation_type(X1,X2)) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_relset_1_5]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X9,X10,X11] :
      ( ~ ilf_type(X9,set_type)
      | ~ ilf_type(X10,set_type)
      | ~ ilf_type(X11,set_type)
      | ~ subset(X9,cross_product(X10,X11))
      | ilf_type(X9,relation_type(X10,X11)) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[p1])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X8] : ilf_type(X8,set_type),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[p19]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X25] :
      ( ~ ilf_type(X25,set_type)
      | subset(X25,X25) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[p10])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ilf_type(esk1_0,set_type)
    & ilf_type(esk2_0,set_type)
    & ~ ilf_type(cross_product(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_type(esk1_0,esk2_0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X2,X3))
    | ~ ilf_type(X1,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(X2,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(X3,set_type)
    | ~ subset(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ilf_type(X1,set_type),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X1)
    | ~ ilf_type(X1,set_type) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ilf_type(cross_product(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_type(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X2,X3))
    | ~ subset(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_10]),c_0_10])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_10])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.10  % Problem    : SET643+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.09/0.11  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.32  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.32  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.10/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.32  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 16:56:54 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.45  Running first-order model finding
% 0.16/0.45  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bPLIUFOwED/E---3.1_13427.p
% 0.30/300.10  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.30/300.10  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.30/300.10  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.30/300.10  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.30/300.10  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/300.10  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/300.10  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/300.10  # new_bool_3 with pid 13506 completed with status 0
% 0.30/300.10  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.30/300.10  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.30/300.10  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.30/300.10  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.30/300.10  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/300.10  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.30/300.10  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.30/300.10  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.30/300.10  # Starting 208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with 181s (1) cores
% 0.30/300.10  # 208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with pid 13510 completed with status 0
% 0.30/300.10  # Result found by 208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I
% 0.30/300.10  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.30/300.10  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.30/300.10  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.30/300.10  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/300.10  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.30/300.10  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.30/300.10  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.30/300.10  # Starting 208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with 181s (1) cores
% 0.30/300.10  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.30/300.10  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.30/300.10  
% 0.30/300.10  # Proof found!
% 0.30/300.10  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.30/300.10  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.30/300.10  # Parsed axioms                        : 20
% 0.30/300.10  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 2
% 0.30/300.10  # Initial clauses                      : 37
% 0.30/300.10  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.30/300.10  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 37
% 0.30/300.10  # Processed clauses                    : 68
% 0.30/300.10  # ...of these trivial                  : 8
% 0.30/300.10  # ...subsumed                          : 2
% 0.30/300.10  # ...remaining for further processing  : 58
% 0.30/300.10  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.30/300.10  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.30/300.10  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.30/300.10  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.30/300.10  # Generated clauses                    : 17
% 0.30/300.10  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 14
% 0.30/300.10  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.30/300.10  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.30/300.10  # Paramodulations                      : 17
% 0.30/300.10  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.30/300.10  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.30/300.10  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.30/300.10  # Total rewrite steps                  : 71
% 0.30/300.10  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.30/300.10  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.30/300.10  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.30/300.10  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.30/300.10  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.30/300.10  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.30/300.10  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.30/300.10  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.30/300.10  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.30/300.10  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.30/300.10  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.30/300.10  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.30/300.10  # Current number of processed clauses  : 29
% 0.30/300.10  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 10
% 0.30/300.10  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.30/300.10  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.30/300.10  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 17
% 0.30/300.10  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 10
% 0.30/300.10  # ...number of literals in the above   : 22
% 0.30/300.10  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.30/300.10  # Current number of archived clauses   : 29
% 0.30/300.10  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 44
% 0.30/300.10  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 37
% 0.30/300.10  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 0.30/300.10  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.30/300.10  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.30/300.10  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.30/300.10  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.30/300.10  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.30/300.10  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.30/300.10  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 3344
% 0.30/300.10  
% 0.30/300.10  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/300.10  # User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.30/300.10  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.30/300.10  # Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.30/300.10  # Maximum resident set size: 1816 pages
% 0.30/300.10  
% 0.30/300.10  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/300.10  # User time                : 0.010 s
% 0.30/300.10  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.30/300.10  # Total time               : 0.012 s
% 0.30/300.10  # Maximum resident set size: 1700 pages
% 0.30/300.10  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------