TSTP Solution File: SET643+3 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : SET643+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 14:35:01 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.55s 0.58s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   29
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   42 (   7 unt;  25 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   39 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   36 (  14   ~;  11   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   37 (  22   >;  15   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   20 (  20 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   1 sgn;  14   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    set_type: $i ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    ilf_type: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    cross_product: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    relation_type: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    member: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    ordered_pair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    subset_type: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    power_set: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    member_type: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_32,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_33,type,
    relation_like: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_34,type,
    esk1_3: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_35,type,
    esk2_3: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_36,type,
    esk3_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_37,type,
    esk4_1: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_38,type,
    esk5_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_39,type,
    esk6_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_40,type,
    esk7_1: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_41,type,
    esk8_1: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_42,type,
    esk9_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_43,type,
    esk10_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_44,type,
    esk11_1: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_45,type,
    esk12_0: $i ).

tff(decl_46,type,
    esk13_0: $i ).

fof(p1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ilf_type(X1,set_type)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ilf_type(X2,set_type)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( ilf_type(X3,set_type)
             => ( subset(X1,cross_product(X2,X3))
               => ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X2,X3)) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p1) ).

fof(p19,axiom,
    ! [X1] : ilf_type(X1,set_type),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p19) ).

fof(p10,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ilf_type(X1,set_type)
     => subset(X1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p10) ).

fof(prove_relset_1_5,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ilf_type(X1,set_type)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ilf_type(X2,set_type)
         => ilf_type(cross_product(X1,X2),relation_type(X1,X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_relset_1_5) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ~ ilf_type(X6,set_type)
      | ~ ilf_type(X7,set_type)
      | ~ ilf_type(X8,set_type)
      | ~ subset(X6,cross_product(X7,X8))
      | ilf_type(X6,relation_type(X7,X8)) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[p1])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X59] : ilf_type(X59,set_type),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[p19]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X35] :
      ( ~ ilf_type(X35,set_type)
      | subset(X35,X35) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[p10])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ilf_type(X1,set_type)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ilf_type(X2,set_type)
           => ilf_type(cross_product(X1,X2),relation_type(X1,X2)) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_relset_1_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X2,X3))
    | ~ ilf_type(X1,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(X2,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(X3,set_type)
    | ~ subset(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ilf_type(X1,set_type),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X1)
    | ~ ilf_type(X1,set_type) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( ilf_type(esk12_0,set_type)
    & ilf_type(esk13_0,set_type)
    & ~ ilf_type(cross_product(esk12_0,esk13_0),relation_type(esk12_0,esk13_0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X2,X3))
    | ~ subset(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_9]),c_0_9])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_9])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ilf_type(cross_product(esk12_0,esk13_0),relation_type(esk12_0,esk13_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ilf_type(cross_product(X1,X2),relation_type(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.12  % Problem    : SET643+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime   : Sat Aug 26 10:32:50 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.57  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.55/0.58  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.55/0.58  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/0.58  % Proof found
% 0.55/0.58  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/0.58  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.55/0.59  % Total time : 0.007000 s
% 0.55/0.59  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.55/0.59  % Total time : 0.010000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------