TSTP Solution File: SET639+3 by iProver---3.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.8
% Problem  : SET639+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 15:08:51 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 1.84s 1.14s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.84s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   42 (  28 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   30 (  11   ~;   3   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   0 sgn;  14   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
     => intersection(X0,X1) = X0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subset_intersection) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : intersection(X0,X1) = intersection(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_intersection) ).

fof(f10,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( empty_set = intersection(X1,X0)
        & subset(X0,X1) )
     => empty_set = X0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_th121) ).

fof(f11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ( empty_set = intersection(X1,X0)
          & subset(X0,X1) )
       => empty_set = X0 ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( intersection(X0,X1) = X0
      | ~ subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( empty_set != X0
      & empty_set = intersection(X1,X0)
      & subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( empty_set != X0
      & empty_set = intersection(X1,X0)
      & subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1] :
        ( empty_set != X0
        & empty_set = intersection(X1,X0)
        & subset(X0,X1) )
   => ( empty_set != sK2
      & empty_set = intersection(sK3,sK2)
      & subset(sK2,sK3) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ( empty_set != sK2
    & empty_set = intersection(sK3,sK2)
    & subset(sK2,sK3) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2,sK3])],[f15,f28]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( intersection(X0,X1) = X0
      | ~ subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : intersection(X0,X1) = intersection(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f47,plain,
    subset(sK2,sK3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

fof(f48,plain,
    empty_set = intersection(sK3,sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

fof(f49,plain,
    empty_set != sK2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

cnf(c_49,plain,
    ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
    | intersection(X0,X1) = X0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

cnf(c_60,plain,
    intersection(X0,X1) = intersection(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).

cnf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
    empty_set != sK2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f49]) ).

cnf(c_65,negated_conjecture,
    intersection(sK3,sK2) = empty_set,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f48]) ).

cnf(c_66,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK2,sK3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f47]) ).

cnf(c_137,plain,
    intersection(sK2,sK3) = empty_set,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_60]) ).

cnf(c_510,plain,
    intersection(sK2,sK3) = sK2,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_66,c_49]) ).

cnf(c_512,plain,
    empty_set = sK2,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_510,c_137]) ).

cnf(c_513,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_512,c_64]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SET639+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.14/0.14  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.33  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 09:09:38 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.45  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 1.84/1.14  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.84/1.14  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.84/1.14  
% 1.84/1.14  %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 1.84/1.14  
% 1.84/1.14  ------  iProver source info
% 1.84/1.14  
% 1.84/1.14  git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 1.84/1.14  git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 1.84/1.14  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.84/1.14  git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 1.84/1.14  
% 1.84/1.14  ------ Parsing...
% 1.84/1.14  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 1.84/1.14  
% 1.84/1.14  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 1.84/1.14  
% 1.84/1.14  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 1.84/1.14  
% 1.84/1.14  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 1.84/1.14  ------ Proving...
% 1.84/1.14  ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.84/1.14  
% 1.84/1.14  
% 1.84/1.14  clauses                                 16
% 1.84/1.14  conjectures                             2
% 1.84/1.14  EPR                                     6
% 1.84/1.14  Horn                                    14
% 1.84/1.14  unary                                   6
% 1.84/1.14  binary                                  5
% 1.84/1.14  lits                                    31
% 1.84/1.14  lits eq                                 7
% 1.84/1.14  fd_pure                                 0
% 1.84/1.14  fd_pseudo                               0
% 1.84/1.14  fd_cond                                 0
% 1.84/1.14  fd_pseudo_cond                          3
% 1.84/1.14  AC symbols                              0
% 1.84/1.14  
% 1.84/1.14  ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 1.84/1.14  
% 1.84/1.14  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.84/1.14  
% 1.84/1.14  
% 1.84/1.14  ------ 
% 1.84/1.14  Current options:
% 1.84/1.14  ------ 
% 1.84/1.14  
% 1.84/1.14  
% 1.84/1.14  
% 1.84/1.14  
% 1.84/1.14  ------ Proving...
% 1.84/1.14  
% 1.84/1.14  
% 1.84/1.14  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.84/1.14  
% 1.84/1.14  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.84/1.14  
% 1.84/1.14  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------