TSTP Solution File: SET639+3 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : SET639+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 15:25:48 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 5.11s 1.50s
% Output   : Proof 6.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SET639+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 09:13:24 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.61  ________       _____
% 0.19/0.61  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.19/0.61  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.19/0.61  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.19/0.61  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.19/0.61  
% 0.19/0.61  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.19/0.61  (2023-06-19)
% 0.19/0.61  
% 0.19/0.61  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.19/0.61  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.19/0.61                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.19/0.61  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.19/0.61  
% 0.19/0.61  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.19/0.61  
% 0.19/0.61  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.19/0.63  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.19/0.65  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.19/0.65  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.19/0.65  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.19/0.65  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.19/0.65  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.19/0.65  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.19/0.65  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 2.30/1.06  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.30/1.06  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.55/1.10  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.55/1.10  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.55/1.10  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.55/1.10  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.55/1.10  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 4.21/1.38  Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 4.21/1.39  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 4.21/1.39  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 4.21/1.39  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.21/1.39  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 4.21/1.40  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 4.21/1.40  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.21/1.40  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 4.21/1.41  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 4.74/1.42  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.11/1.49  Prover 2: proved (853ms)
% 5.11/1.50  
% 5.11/1.50  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.11/1.50  
% 5.11/1.51  Prover 3: stopped
% 5.11/1.51  Prover 5: stopped
% 5.11/1.51  Prover 6: stopped
% 5.11/1.51  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 5.11/1.51  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 5.11/1.51  Prover 0: stopped
% 5.11/1.51  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 5.11/1.51  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 5.11/1.52  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 5.11/1.53  Prover 4: Found proof (size 12)
% 5.11/1.53  Prover 4: proved (883ms)
% 5.11/1.53  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 5.11/1.53  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 5.11/1.54  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 5.11/1.54  Prover 1: stopped
% 5.11/1.54  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 5.11/1.55  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 5.64/1.56  Prover 7: stopped
% 5.64/1.56  Prover 10: stopped
% 5.64/1.57  Prover 13: stopped
% 5.64/1.58  Prover 11: stopped
% 5.85/1.62  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 5.85/1.62  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.08/1.63  Prover 8: stopped
% 6.08/1.63  
% 6.08/1.63  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.08/1.63  
% 6.08/1.63  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 6.08/1.64  Assumptions after simplification:
% 6.08/1.64  ---------------------------------
% 6.08/1.64  
% 6.08/1.64    (commutativity_of_intersection)
% 6.18/1.66     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (intersection(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~
% 6.18/1.66      $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | (intersection(v0, v1) = v2 & $i(v2))) &  ! [v0: $i] : 
% 6.18/1.66    ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (intersection(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 6.18/1.66      $i(v0) | (intersection(v1, v0) = v2 & $i(v2)))
% 6.18/1.66  
% 6.18/1.66    (prove_th121)
% 6.18/1.66    $i(empty_set) &  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] : ( ~ (v0 = empty_set) &
% 6.18/1.66      intersection(v1, v0) = empty_set & subset(v0, v1) = 0 & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 6.18/1.66  
% 6.18/1.66    (subset_intersection)
% 6.18/1.67     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v2 = v0 |  ~ (intersection(v0, v1)
% 6.18/1.67        = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & subset(v0,
% 6.18/1.67          v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (subset(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~
% 6.18/1.67      $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | intersection(v0, v1) = v0)
% 6.18/1.67  
% 6.18/1.67    (function-axioms)
% 6.18/1.67     ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  !
% 6.18/1.67    [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (member(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (member(v3, v2) = v0)) & 
% 6.18/1.67    ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 6.18/1.67      (intersection(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 6.18/1.67      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i]
% 6.18/1.67    : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (subset(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (subset(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 6.18/1.67      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | 
% 6.18/1.67      ~ (empty(v2) = v1) |  ~ (empty(v2) = v0))
% 6.18/1.67  
% 6.18/1.67  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 6.18/1.67  --------------------------------------------
% 6.18/1.67  empty_defn, empty_set_defn, equal_defn, equal_member_defn, intersection_defn,
% 6.18/1.67  reflexivity_of_subset, subset_defn
% 6.18/1.67  
% 6.18/1.67  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 6.18/1.67  ---------------------------------
% 6.18/1.67  
% 6.18/1.67  Begin of proof
% 6.18/1.67  | 
% 6.18/1.67  | ALPHA: (subset_intersection) implies:
% 6.18/1.67  |   (1)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (subset(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 6.18/1.67  |          $i(v0) | intersection(v0, v1) = v0)
% 6.18/1.67  | 
% 6.18/1.67  | ALPHA: (commutativity_of_intersection) implies:
% 6.18/1.67  |   (2)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (intersection(v1, v0) =
% 6.18/1.67  |            v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | (intersection(v0, v1) = v2 & $i(v2)))
% 6.18/1.67  | 
% 6.18/1.67  | ALPHA: (prove_th121) implies:
% 6.18/1.67  |   (3)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] : ( ~ (v0 = empty_set) & intersection(v1, v0)
% 6.18/1.67  |          = empty_set & subset(v0, v1) = 0 & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 6.18/1.68  | 
% 6.18/1.68  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 6.18/1.68  |   (4)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 6.18/1.68  |          (intersection(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection(v3, v2) = v0))
% 6.18/1.68  | 
% 6.18/1.68  | DELTA: instantiating (3) with fresh symbols all_12_0, all_12_1 gives:
% 6.18/1.68  |   (5)   ~ (all_12_1 = empty_set) & intersection(all_12_0, all_12_1) =
% 6.18/1.68  |        empty_set & subset(all_12_1, all_12_0) = 0 & $i(all_12_0) &
% 6.18/1.68  |        $i(all_12_1)
% 6.18/1.68  | 
% 6.18/1.68  | ALPHA: (5) implies:
% 6.18/1.68  |   (6)   ~ (all_12_1 = empty_set)
% 6.18/1.68  |   (7)  $i(all_12_1)
% 6.18/1.68  |   (8)  $i(all_12_0)
% 6.18/1.68  |   (9)  subset(all_12_1, all_12_0) = 0
% 6.18/1.68  |   (10)  intersection(all_12_0, all_12_1) = empty_set
% 6.18/1.68  | 
% 6.18/1.68  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_12_1, all_12_0, simplifying with (7),
% 6.18/1.68  |              (8), (9) gives:
% 6.18/1.68  |   (11)  intersection(all_12_1, all_12_0) = all_12_1
% 6.18/1.68  | 
% 6.18/1.68  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_12_1, all_12_0, empty_set, simplifying
% 6.18/1.68  |              with (7), (8), (10) gives:
% 6.18/1.68  |   (12)  intersection(all_12_1, all_12_0) = empty_set & $i(empty_set)
% 6.18/1.68  | 
% 6.18/1.68  | ALPHA: (12) implies:
% 6.18/1.68  |   (13)  intersection(all_12_1, all_12_0) = empty_set
% 6.18/1.68  | 
% 6.18/1.68  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with empty_set, all_12_1, all_12_0, all_12_1,
% 6.18/1.68  |              simplifying with (11), (13) gives:
% 6.18/1.68  |   (14)  all_12_1 = empty_set
% 6.18/1.68  | 
% 6.18/1.68  | REDUCE: (6), (14) imply:
% 6.18/1.68  |   (15)  $false
% 6.18/1.68  | 
% 6.18/1.68  | CLOSE: (15) is inconsistent.
% 6.18/1.68  | 
% 6.18/1.68  End of proof
% 6.18/1.68  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 6.18/1.69  
% 6.18/1.69  1073ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------