TSTP Solution File: SET639+3 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SET639+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:13:57 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.91s 2.10s
% Output   : Refutation 1.91s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   8 unt;   0 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   10 (   7 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ subset(A,B)
    | intersection(A,B) = A ),
    file('SET639+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(15,axiom,
    dollar_c2 != empty_set,
    file('SET639+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(16,plain,
    empty_set != dollar_c2,
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(copy,[status(thm)],[15])]),
    [iquote('copy,15,flip.1')] ).

cnf(22,axiom,
    intersection(A,B) = intersection(B,A),
    file('SET639+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(26,axiom,
    subset(dollar_c2,dollar_c1),
    file('SET639+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(28,axiom,
    intersection(dollar_c1,dollar_c2) = empty_set,
    file('SET639+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(31,plain,
    intersection(dollar_c2,dollar_c1) = dollar_c2,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[26,1]),
    [iquote('hyper,26,1')] ).

cnf(70,plain,
    empty_set = dollar_c2,
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[22,31]),28])]),
    [iquote('para_into,22.1.1,31.1.1,demod,28,flip.1')] ).

cnf(72,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[70,16]),
    [iquote('binary,70.1,16.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11  % Problem  : SET639+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 10:37:30 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.91/2.10  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.91/2.10  The process was started by sandbox on n025.cluster.edu,
% 1.91/2.10  Wed Jul 27 10:37:30 2022
% 1.91/2.10  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 20576.
% 1.91/2.10  
% 1.91/2.10  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.91/2.10  set(auto).
% 1.91/2.10     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.91/2.10     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.91/2.10     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.91/2.10     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.91/2.10     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.91/2.10     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.91/2.10     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.91/2.10     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.91/2.10     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.91/2.10     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.91/2.10     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.91/2.10  clear(print_given).
% 1.91/2.10  
% 1.91/2.10  formula_list(usable).
% 1.91/2.10  all A (A=A).
% 1.91/2.10  all B C (subset(B,C)->intersection(B,C)=B).
% 1.91/2.10  all B (-member(B,empty_set)).
% 1.91/2.10  all B C D (member(D,intersection(B,C))<->member(D,B)&member(D,C)).
% 1.91/2.10  all B C (subset(B,C)<-> (all D (member(D,B)->member(D,C)))).
% 1.91/2.10  all B C (B=C<->subset(B,C)&subset(C,B)).
% 1.91/2.10  all B C (intersection(B,C)=intersection(C,B)).
% 1.91/2.10  all B subset(B,B).
% 1.91/2.10  all B (empty(B)<-> (all C (-member(C,B)))).
% 1.91/2.10  all B C (B=C<-> (all D (member(D,B)<->member(D,C)))).
% 1.91/2.10  -(all B C (subset(B,C)&intersection(C,B)=empty_set->B=empty_set)).
% 1.91/2.10  end_of_list.
% 1.91/2.10  
% 1.91/2.10  -------> usable clausifies to:
% 1.91/2.10  
% 1.91/2.10  list(usable).
% 1.91/2.10  0 [] A=A.
% 1.91/2.10  0 [] -subset(B,C)|intersection(B,C)=B.
% 1.91/2.10  0 [] -member(B,empty_set).
% 1.91/2.10  0 [] -member(D,intersection(B,C))|member(D,B).
% 1.91/2.10  0 [] -member(D,intersection(B,C))|member(D,C).
% 1.91/2.10  0 [] member(D,intersection(B,C))| -member(D,B)| -member(D,C).
% 1.91/2.10  0 [] -subset(B,C)| -member(D,B)|member(D,C).
% 1.91/2.10  0 [] subset(B,C)|member($f1(B,C),B).
% 1.91/2.10  0 [] subset(B,C)| -member($f1(B,C),C).
% 1.91/2.10  0 [] B!=C|subset(B,C).
% 1.91/2.10  0 [] B!=C|subset(C,B).
% 1.91/2.10  0 [] B=C| -subset(B,C)| -subset(C,B).
% 1.91/2.10  0 [] intersection(B,C)=intersection(C,B).
% 1.91/2.10  0 [] subset(B,B).
% 1.91/2.10  0 [] -empty(B)| -member(C,B).
% 1.91/2.10  0 [] empty(B)|member($f2(B),B).
% 1.91/2.10  0 [] B!=C| -member(D,B)|member(D,C).
% 1.91/2.10  0 [] B!=C|member(D,B)| -member(D,C).
% 1.91/2.10  0 [] B=C|member($f3(B,C),B)|member($f3(B,C),C).
% 1.91/2.10  0 [] B=C| -member($f3(B,C),B)| -member($f3(B,C),C).
% 1.91/2.10  0 [] subset($c2,$c1).
% 1.91/2.10  0 [] intersection($c1,$c2)=empty_set.
% 1.91/2.10  0 [] $c2!=empty_set.
% 1.91/2.10  end_of_list.
% 1.91/2.10  
% 1.91/2.10  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 1.91/2.10  
% 1.91/2.10  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 1.91/2.10  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, factoring, and unit
% 1.91/2.10  deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 1.91/2.10  clauses in usable.
% 1.91/2.10  
% 1.91/2.10     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.91/2.10     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.91/2.10     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.91/2.10     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.91/2.10     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.91/2.10     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.91/2.10     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.91/2.10     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.91/2.10     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.91/2.10     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.91/2.10     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.91/2.10     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.91/2.10     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.91/2.10     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.91/2.10     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.91/2.10     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.91/2.10  
% 1.91/2.10  ------------> process usable:
% 1.91/2.10  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 1 [] -subset(A,B)|intersection(A,B)=A.
% 1.91/2.10  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 2 [] -member(A,empty_set).
% 1.91/2.10  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 3 [] -member(A,intersection(B,C))|member(A,B).
% 1.91/2.10  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 4 [] -member(A,intersection(B,C))|member(A,C).
% 1.91/2.10  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 5 [] member(A,intersection(B,C))| -member(A,B)| -member(A,C).
% 1.91/2.10  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 6 [] -subset(A,B)| -member(C,A)|member(C,B).
% 1.91/2.10  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 7 [] subset(A,B)| -member($f1(A,B),B).
% 1.91/2.10  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 8 [] A!=B|subset(A,B).
% 1.91/2.10  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 9 [] A!=B|subset(B,A).
% 1.91/2.10  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 10 [] A=B| -subset(A,B)| -subset(B,A).
% 1.91/2.10  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 11 [] -empty(A)| -member(B,A).
% 1.91/2.10  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 12 [] A!=B| -member(C,A)|member(C,B).
% 1.91/2.10  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 13 [] A!=B|member(C,A)| -member(C,B).
% 1.91/2.10  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 14 [] A=B| -member($f3(A,B),A)| -member($f3(A,B),B).
% 1.91/2.10  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 16 [copy,15,flip.1] empty_set!=$c2.
% 1.91/2.10  
% 1.91/2.10  ------------> process sos:
% 1.91/2.10  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 20 [] A=A.
% 1.91/2.10  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 21 [] subset(A,B)|member($f1(A,B),A).
% 1.91/2.10  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 22 [] intersection(A,B)=intersection(B,A).
% 1.91/2.10  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 23 [] subset(A,A).
% 1.91/2.10  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 24 [] empty(A)|member($f2(A),A).
% 1.91/2.10  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 25 [] A=B|member($f3(A,B),A)|member($f3(A,B),B).
% 1.91/2.10  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 26 [] subset($c2,$c1).
% 1.91/2.10  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 27 [] intersection($c1,$c2)=empty_set.
% 1.91/2.10  ---> New Demodulator: 28 [new_demod,27] intersection($c1,$c2)=empty_set.
% 1.91/2.10    Following clause subsumed by 20 during input processing: 0 [copy,20,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.91/2.10  20 back subsumes 19.
% 1.91/2.10  20 back subsumes 18.
% 1.91/2.10    Following clause subsumed by 22 during input processing: 0 [copy,22,flip.1] intersection(A,B)=intersection(B,A).
% 1.91/2.10  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 28.
% 1.91/2.10  
% 1.91/2.10  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.91/2.10  
% 1.91/2.10  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.91/2.10  
% 1.91/2.10  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.91/2.10  
% 1.91/2.10  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.00 sec ----> 72 [binary,70.1,16.1] $F.
% 1.91/2.10  
% 1.91/2.10  Length of proof is 3.  Level of proof is 2.
% 1.91/2.10  
% 1.91/2.10  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.91/2.10  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.91/2.10  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.91/2.10  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.91/2.10  
% 1.91/2.10  
% 1.91/2.10  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.91/2.10  
% 1.91/2.10  
% 1.91/2.10  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.91/2.10  
% 1.91/2.10  ============ end of search ============
% 1.91/2.10  
% 1.91/2.10  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.91/2.10  clauses given                 11
% 1.91/2.10  clauses generated            121
% 1.91/2.10  clauses kept                  66
% 1.91/2.10  clauses forward subsumed      75
% 1.91/2.10  clauses back subsumed          2
% 1.91/2.10  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.91/2.10  
% 1.91/2.10  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.91/2.10  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.91/2.10  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.91/2.10  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.91/2.10  
% 1.91/2.10  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.91/2.10  
% 1.91/2.10  Process 20576 finished Wed Jul 27 10:37:32 2022
% 1.91/2.10  Otter interrupted
% 1.91/2.10  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------