TSTP Solution File: SET639+3 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SET639+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:13:06 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.66s 2.33s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.66s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 14 ( 9 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_21,negated_conjecture,
intersection(esk5_0,esk4_0) = empty_set,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0x_9ju3h/lgb.p',i_0_21) ).
cnf(i_0_12,plain,
intersection(X1,X2) = intersection(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0x_9ju3h/lgb.p',i_0_12) ).
cnf(i_0_1,plain,
( intersection(X1,X2) = X1
| ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0x_9ju3h/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_22,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk4_0,esk5_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0x_9ju3h/lgb.p',i_0_22) ).
cnf(i_0_20,negated_conjecture,
empty_set != esk4_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0x_9ju3h/lgb.p',i_0_20) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
intersection(esk5_0,esk4_0) = empty_set,
i_0_21 ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
intersection(X1,X2) = intersection(X2,X1),
i_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( intersection(X1,X2) = X1
| ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk4_0,esk5_0),
i_0_22 ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
intersection(esk4_0,esk5_0) = empty_set,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
empty_set != esk4_0,
i_0_20 ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32]),c_0_33]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SET639+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jul 9 21:06:22 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.66/2.33 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.66/2.33 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.66/2.33 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.66/2.33 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_____0026_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S4S
% 7.66/2.33 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHPNS.
% 7.66/2.33 #
% 7.66/2.33 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 7.66/2.33
% 7.66/2.33 # Proof found!
% 7.66/2.33 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.66/2.33 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.66/2.33 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.66/2.33
% 7.66/2.33 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.66/2.33 # User time : 0.027 s
% 7.66/2.33 # System time : 0.002 s
% 7.66/2.33 # Total time : 0.029 s
% 7.66/2.33 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 7.66/2.33
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------