TSTP Solution File: SET638+3 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SET638+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:13:05 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.29s 2.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.29s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 26 ( 24 unt; 0 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 28 ( 18 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_4,plain,
union(intersection(X1,X2),intersection(X1,X3)) = intersection(X1,union(X2,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cfdgsj06/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(i_0_19,plain,
intersection(X1,X2) = intersection(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cfdgsj06/lgb.p',i_0_19) ).
cnf(i_0_28,negated_conjecture,
intersection(esk4_0,esk6_0) = empty_set,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cfdgsj06/lgb.p',i_0_28) ).
cnf(i_0_29,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk4_0,union(esk5_0,esk6_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cfdgsj06/lgb.p',i_0_29) ).
cnf(i_0_18,plain,
union(X1,X2) = union(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cfdgsj06/lgb.p',i_0_18) ).
cnf(i_0_3,plain,
union(X1,empty_set) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cfdgsj06/lgb.p',i_0_3) ).
cnf(i_0_2,plain,
( intersection(X1,X2) = X1
| ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cfdgsj06/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_1,plain,
subset(intersection(X1,X2),X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cfdgsj06/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_27,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(esk4_0,esk5_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cfdgsj06/lgb.p',i_0_27) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
union(intersection(X1,X2),intersection(X1,X3)) = intersection(X1,union(X2,X3)),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
intersection(X1,X2) = intersection(X2,X1),
i_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
intersection(esk4_0,esk6_0) = empty_set,
i_0_28 ).
cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk4_0,union(esk5_0,esk6_0)),
i_0_29 ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
union(X1,X2) = union(X2,X1),
i_0_18 ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
union(intersection(X1,X2),intersection(X3,X1)) = intersection(X1,union(X2,X3)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
intersection(esk6_0,esk4_0) = empty_set,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_40]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
union(X1,empty_set) = X1,
i_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
( intersection(X1,X2) = X1
| ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk4_0,union(esk6_0,esk5_0)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
intersection(esk4_0,union(X1,esk6_0)) = intersection(esk4_0,X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]),c_0_46]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
intersection(esk4_0,union(esk6_0,esk5_0)) = esk4_0,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]) ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
intersection(esk4_0,union(esk6_0,X1)) = intersection(esk4_0,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_43]) ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
subset(intersection(X1,X2),X1),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
intersection(esk5_0,esk4_0) = esk4_0,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]),c_0_40]) ).
cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(esk4_0,esk5_0),
i_0_27 ).
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_53]),c_0_54]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SET638+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 23:42:32 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 8.29/2.44 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.29/2.44 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.29/2.44 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.29/2.44 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___024_B31_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S2S
% 8.29/2.44 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 8.29/2.44 #
% 8.29/2.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.020 s
% 8.29/2.44
% 8.29/2.44 # Proof found!
% 8.29/2.44 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.29/2.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.29/2.44 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.29/2.44
% 8.29/2.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.29/2.44 # User time : 0.022 s
% 8.29/2.44 # System time : 0.006 s
% 8.29/2.44 # Total time : 0.028 s
% 8.29/2.44 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.29/2.44
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------