TSTP Solution File: SET635+3 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : SET635+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.B4Se2vRJdj true

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 16:15:13 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.71s
% Output   : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   38 (  25 unt;   8 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   35 (  27 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  211 (  10   ~;   4   |;   0   &; 196   @)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    8 (   8   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   56 (   0   ^;  56   !;   0   ?;  56   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(sk__5_type,type,
    sk__5: $i ).

thf(intersection_type,type,
    intersection: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(sk__4_type,type,
    sk__4: $i ).

thf(empty_set_type,type,
    empty_set: $i ).

thf(difference_type,type,
    difference: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(subset_type,type,
    subset: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(sk__3_type,type,
    sk__3: $i ).

thf(union_type,type,
    union: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(difference_empty_set,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( difference @ B @ C )
        = empty_set )
    <=> ( subset @ B @ C ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl2,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( difference @ X0 @ X1 )
        = empty_set )
      | ~ ( subset @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[difference_empty_set]) ).

thf(difference_and_intersection_and_union,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
      ( ( difference @ B @ ( intersection @ C @ D ) )
      = ( union @ ( difference @ B @ C ) @ ( difference @ B @ D ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl4,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( difference @ X0 @ ( intersection @ X1 @ X2 ) )
      = ( union @ ( difference @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( difference @ X0 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[difference_and_intersection_and_union]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl150,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( ( difference @ X1 @ ( intersection @ X2 @ X0 ) )
        = ( union @ empty_set @ ( difference @ X1 @ X0 ) ) )
      | ~ ( subset @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
    inference('sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl2,zip_derived_cl4]) ).

thf(commutativity_of_union,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( union @ B @ C )
      = ( union @ C @ B ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl15,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( union @ X1 @ X0 )
      = ( union @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[commutativity_of_union]) ).

thf(union_empty_set,axiom,
    ! [B: $i] :
      ( ( union @ B @ empty_set )
      = B ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl3,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( union @ X0 @ empty_set )
      = X0 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[union_empty_set]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl117,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( union @ empty_set @ X0 )
      = X0 ),
    inference('sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl15,zip_derived_cl3]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl154,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( ( difference @ X1 @ ( intersection @ X2 @ X0 ) )
        = ( difference @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      | ~ ( subset @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl150,zip_derived_cl117]) ).

thf(prove_th117,conjecture,
    ! [B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
      ( ( intersection @ B @ ( difference @ C @ D ) )
      = ( difference @ ( intersection @ B @ C ) @ ( intersection @ B @ D ) ) ) ).

thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
        ( ( intersection @ B @ ( difference @ C @ D ) )
        = ( difference @ ( intersection @ B @ C ) @ ( intersection @ B @ D ) ) ),
    inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[prove_th117]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl28,plain,
    ( ( intersection @ sk__3 @ ( difference @ sk__4 @ sk__5 ) )
   != ( difference @ ( intersection @ sk__3 @ sk__4 ) @ ( intersection @ sk__3 @ sk__5 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(difference_and_intersection,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
      ( ( intersection @ B @ ( difference @ C @ D ) )
      = ( difference @ ( intersection @ B @ C ) @ D ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl5,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( intersection @ X0 @ ( difference @ X1 @ X2 ) )
      = ( difference @ ( intersection @ X0 @ X1 ) @ X2 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[difference_and_intersection]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl138,plain,
    ( ( intersection @ sk__3 @ ( difference @ sk__4 @ sk__5 ) )
   != ( intersection @ sk__3 @ ( difference @ sk__4 @ ( intersection @ sk__3 @ sk__5 ) ) ) ),
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl28,zip_derived_cl5]) ).

thf(commutativity_of_intersection,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( intersection @ B @ C )
      = ( intersection @ C @ B ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl17,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( intersection @ X1 @ X0 )
      = ( intersection @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[commutativity_of_intersection]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl5_001,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( intersection @ X0 @ ( difference @ X1 @ X2 ) )
      = ( difference @ ( intersection @ X0 @ X1 ) @ X2 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[difference_and_intersection]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl142,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( intersection @ X0 @ ( difference @ X1 @ X2 ) )
      = ( difference @ ( intersection @ X1 @ X0 ) @ X2 ) ),
    inference('sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl17,zip_derived_cl5]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl5_002,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( intersection @ X0 @ ( difference @ X1 @ X2 ) )
      = ( difference @ ( intersection @ X0 @ X1 ) @ X2 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[difference_and_intersection]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl161,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( intersection @ X1 @ ( difference @ X2 @ X0 ) )
      = ( intersection @ X2 @ ( difference @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference('sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl142,zip_derived_cl5]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl161_003,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( intersection @ X1 @ ( difference @ X2 @ X0 ) )
      = ( intersection @ X2 @ ( difference @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference('sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl142,zip_derived_cl5]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl302,plain,
    ( ( intersection @ sk__4 @ ( difference @ sk__3 @ sk__5 ) )
   != ( intersection @ sk__4 @ ( difference @ sk__3 @ ( intersection @ sk__3 @ sk__5 ) ) ) ),
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl138,zip_derived_cl161,zip_derived_cl161]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl1002,plain,
    ( ( ( intersection @ sk__4 @ ( difference @ sk__3 @ sk__5 ) )
     != ( intersection @ sk__4 @ ( difference @ sk__3 @ sk__5 ) ) )
    | ~ ( subset @ sk__3 @ sk__3 ) ),
    inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl154,zip_derived_cl302]) ).

thf(reflexivity_of_subset,axiom,
    ! [B: $i] : ( subset @ B @ B ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl21,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ( subset @ X0 @ X0 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[reflexivity_of_subset]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl1029,plain,
    ( ( intersection @ sk__4 @ ( difference @ sk__3 @ sk__5 ) )
   != ( intersection @ sk__4 @ ( difference @ sk__3 @ sk__5 ) ) ),
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl1002,zip_derived_cl21]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl1030,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simplify,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl1029]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem  : SET635+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.10  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.B4Se2vRJdj true
% 0.09/0.29  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.29  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.29  % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 12:29:13 EDT 2023
% 0.09/0.29  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.29  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.09/0.29  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.29  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.09/0.29  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.09/0.29  % Running in FO mode
% 0.14/0.47  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.14/0.47  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.14/0.47  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.14/0.53  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.14/0.53  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.14/0.53  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.14/0.54  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.14/0.54  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.14/0.54  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.14/0.54  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.14/0.71  % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.14/0.71  % BCE start: 29
% 0.14/0.71  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.14/0.71  % PE start: 29
% 0.14/0.71  logic: eq
% 0.14/0.71  % PE eliminated: 1
% 0.14/0.71  % done 181 iterations in 0.152s
% 0.14/0.71  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.14/0.71  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.71  
% 0.14/0.71  
% 0.14/0.71  % Terminating...
% 1.99/0.83  % Runner terminated.
% 1.99/0.84  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------