TSTP Solution File: SET633+3 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SET633+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:20:03 EDT 2023

% Result   : Timeout 408.26s 300.15s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   28 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   23 (   9   ~;   6   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   0 sgn;  16   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_th115,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( subset(difference(X1,X2),X3)
        & subset(difference(X2,X1),X3) )
     => subset(symmetric_difference(X1,X2),X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.MpCTDWC4IK/E---3.1_29050.p',prove_th115) ).

fof(union_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( subset(X1,X2)
        & subset(X3,X2) )
     => subset(union(X1,X3),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.MpCTDWC4IK/E---3.1_29050.p',union_subset) ).

fof(symmetric_difference_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : symmetric_difference(X1,X2) = union(difference(X1,X2),difference(X2,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.MpCTDWC4IK/E---3.1_29050.p',symmetric_difference_defn) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( subset(difference(X1,X2),X3)
          & subset(difference(X2,X1),X3) )
       => subset(symmetric_difference(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_th115]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X7,X8,X9] :
      ( ~ subset(X7,X8)
      | ~ subset(X9,X8)
      | subset(union(X7,X9),X8) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[union_subset])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X17,X18] : symmetric_difference(X17,X18) = union(difference(X17,X18),difference(X18,X17)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[symmetric_difference_defn]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(difference(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0)
    & subset(difference(esk2_0,esk1_0),esk3_0)
    & ~ subset(symmetric_difference(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( subset(union(X1,X3),X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    symmetric_difference(X1,X2) = union(difference(X1,X2),difference(X2,X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(symmetric_difference(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( subset(symmetric_difference(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ subset(difference(X2,X1),X3)
    | ~ subset(difference(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    subset(difference(esk2_0,esk1_0),esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    subset(difference(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.14  % Problem    : SET633+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.12/0.15  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 16:50:44 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.22/0.50  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.50  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.MpCTDWC4IK/E---3.1_29050.p
% 408.26/300.15  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 408.26/300.15  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 408.26/300.15  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 408.26/300.15  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 408.26/300.15  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.26/300.15  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.26/300.15  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 408.26/300.15  # new_bool_3 with pid 29144 completed with status 0
% 408.26/300.15  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 408.26/300.15  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 408.26/300.15  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 408.26/300.15  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 408.26/300.15  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.26/300.15  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 408.26/300.15  # Search class: FGHSM-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 408.26/300.15  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 408.26/300.15  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 408.26/300.15  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 29147 completed with status 0
% 408.26/300.15  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 408.26/300.15  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 408.26/300.15  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 408.26/300.15  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 408.26/300.15  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.26/300.15  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 408.26/300.15  # Search class: FGHSM-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 408.26/300.15  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 408.26/300.15  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 408.26/300.15  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 408.26/300.15  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 408.26/300.15  
% 408.26/300.15  # Proof found!
% 408.26/300.15  # SZS status Theorem
% 408.26/300.15  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 408.26/300.15  # Parsed axioms                        : 9
% 408.26/300.15  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 408.26/300.15  # Initial clauses                      : 18
% 408.26/300.15  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 408.26/300.15  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 16
% 408.26/300.15  # Processed clauses                    : 57
% 408.26/300.15  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 408.26/300.15  # ...subsumed                          : 4
% 408.26/300.15  # ...remaining for further processing  : 53
% 408.26/300.15  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 408.26/300.15  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 408.26/300.15  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 408.26/300.15  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 408.26/300.15  # Generated clauses                    : 61
% 408.26/300.15  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 45
% 408.26/300.15  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 408.26/300.15  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 408.26/300.15  # Paramodulations                      : 59
% 408.26/300.15  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 408.26/300.15  # NegExts                              : 0
% 408.26/300.15  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 408.26/300.15  # Total rewrite steps                  : 7
% 408.26/300.15  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 408.26/300.15  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 408.26/300.15  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 408.26/300.15  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 408.26/300.15  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 408.26/300.15  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 408.26/300.15  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 408.26/300.15  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 408.26/300.15  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 408.26/300.15  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 408.26/300.15  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 408.26/300.15  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 408.26/300.15  # Current number of processed clauses  : 37
% 408.26/300.15  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
% 408.26/300.15  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 408.26/300.15  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 408.26/300.15  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 30
% 408.26/300.15  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 19
% 408.26/300.15  # ...number of literals in the above   : 67
% 408.26/300.15  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 408.26/300.15  # Current number of archived clauses   : 16
% 408.26/300.15  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 188
% 408.26/300.15  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 159
% 408.26/300.15  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
% 408.26/300.15  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 408.26/300.15  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 408.26/300.15  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
% 408.26/300.15  # BW rewrite match successes           : 4
% 408.26/300.15  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 408.26/300.15  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 408.26/300.15  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2086
% 408.26/300.15  
% 408.26/300.15  # -------------------------------------------------
% 408.26/300.15  # User time                : 0.007 s
% 408.26/300.15  # System time              : 0.000 s
% 408.26/300.15  # Total time               : 0.007 s
% 408.26/300.15  # Maximum resident set size: 1772 pages
% 408.26/300.15  
% 408.26/300.15  # -------------------------------------------------
% 408.26/300.15  # User time                : 0.009 s
% 408.26/300.15  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 408.26/300.15  # Total time               : 0.010 s
% 408.26/300.15  # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 408.26/300.15  % E---3.1 exiting
% 408.26/300.15  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------