TSTP Solution File: SET631+3 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : SET631+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 14:30:30 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.17s 0.57s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem    : SET631+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime   : Sat Aug 26 10:03:38 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.17/0.53  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.17/0.56  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.56  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 0.17/0.56  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.17/0.56  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.17/0.56  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.17/0.56  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.17/0.56  
% 0.17/0.56  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.17/0.56  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.17/0.56  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.57  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.57  % File     : SET631+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.17/0.57  % Domain   : Set Theory
% 0.17/0.57  % Problem  : If X intersects the difference of Y and Z, then X intersects Y
% 0.17/0.57  % Version  : [Try90] axioms : Reduced > Incomplete.
% 0.17/0.57  % English  :
% 0.17/0.57  
% 0.17/0.57  % Refs     : [ILF] The ILF Group (1998), The ILF System: A Tool for the Int
% 0.17/0.57  %          : [Try90] Trybulec (1990), Tarski Grothendieck Set Theory
% 0.17/0.57  %          : [TS89]  Trybulec & Swieczkowska (1989), Boolean Properties of
% 0.17/0.57  % Source   : [ILF]
% 0.17/0.57  % Names    : BOOLE (113) [TS89]
% 0.17/0.57  
% 0.17/0.57  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.17/0.57  % Rating   : 0.07 v8.1.0, 0.00 v6.3.0, 0.08 v6.2.0, 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0, 0.00 v2.2.1
% 0.17/0.57  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    4 (   0 unt;   0 def)
% 0.17/0.57  %            Number of atoms       :   10 (   0 equ)
% 0.17/0.57  %            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
% 0.17/0.57  %            Number of connectives :    7 (   1   ~;   0   |;   2   &)
% 0.17/0.57  %                                         (   2 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.17/0.57  %            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   6 avg)
% 0.17/0.57  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.17/0.57  %            Number of predicates  :    2 (   2 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.17/0.57  %            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.17/0.57  %            Number of variables   :   11 (  10   !;   1   ?)
% 0.17/0.57  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.17/0.57  
% 0.17/0.57  % Comments :
% 0.17/0.57  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.57  %---- line(boole - df(4),1833078)
% 0.17/0.57  fof(difference_defn,axiom,
% 0.17/0.57      ! [B,C,D] :
% 0.17/0.57        ( member(D,difference(B,C))
% 0.17/0.57      <=> ( member(D,B)
% 0.17/0.57          & ~ member(D,C) ) ) ).
% 0.17/0.57  
% 0.17/0.57  %---- line(boole - df(5),1833080)
% 0.17/0.57  fof(intersect_defn,axiom,
% 0.17/0.57      ! [B,C] :
% 0.17/0.57        ( intersect(B,C)
% 0.17/0.57      <=> ? [D] :
% 0.17/0.57            ( member(D,B)
% 0.17/0.57            & member(D,C) ) ) ).
% 0.17/0.57  
% 0.17/0.57  %---- property(symmetry,op(intersect,2,predicate))
% 0.17/0.57  fof(symmetry_of_intersect,axiom,
% 0.17/0.57      ! [B,C] :
% 0.17/0.57        ( intersect(B,C)
% 0.17/0.57       => intersect(C,B) ) ).
% 0.17/0.57  
% 0.17/0.57  %---- line(boole - th(113),1834379)
% 0.17/0.57  fof(prove_th113,conjecture,
% 0.17/0.57      ! [B,C,D] :
% 0.17/0.57        ( intersect(B,difference(C,D))
% 0.17/0.57       => intersect(B,C) ) ).
% 0.17/0.57  
% 0.17/0.57  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.57  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.57  % Proof found
% 0.17/0.57  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.17/0.57  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.17/0.57  %ClaNum:9(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.17/0.57  %VarNum:37(SingletonVarNum:18)
% 0.17/0.57  %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.17/0.57  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.17/0.57  %SharedTerms:6
% 0.17/0.57  %goalClause: 1 2
% 0.17/0.57  %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.17/0.57  [2]~P1(a1,a4)
% 0.17/0.57  [1]P1(a1,f2(a4,a5))
% 0.17/0.57  [3]~P1(x32,x31)+P1(x31,x32)
% 0.17/0.57  [5]~P1(x51,x52)+P2(f3(x51,x52),x52)
% 0.17/0.57  [6]~P1(x61,x62)+P2(f3(x61,x62),x61)
% 0.17/0.57  [8]P2(x81,x82)+~P2(x81,f2(x82,x83))
% 0.17/0.57  [9]~P2(x91,x92)+~P2(x91,f2(x93,x92))
% 0.17/0.57  [4]~P2(x43,x41)+P1(x41,x42)+~P2(x43,x42)
% 0.17/0.57  [7]~P2(x71,x73)+P2(x71,x72)+P2(x71,f2(x73,x72))
% 0.17/0.57  %EqnAxiom
% 0.17/0.57  
% 0.17/0.57  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.57  cnf(20,plain,
% 0.17/0.57     ($false),
% 0.17/0.57     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,3,6,5,4,7,9,8]),
% 0.17/0.57     ['proof']).
% 0.17/0.57  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.17/0.57  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------