TSTP Solution File: SET630+3 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SET630+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:13:00 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.82s 2.39s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.82s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 10 unt; 4 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 24 ( 2 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 26 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_13,plain,
( ~ intersect(X1,X2)
| ~ disjoint(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x52ownhh/lgb.p',i_0_13) ).
cnf(i_0_5,plain,
disjoint(intersection(X1,X2),difference(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x52ownhh/lgb.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(i_0_22,negated_conjecture,
~ disjoint(intersection(esk3_0,esk4_0),union(difference(esk3_0,esk4_0),difference(esk4_0,esk3_0))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x52ownhh/lgb.p',i_0_22) ).
cnf(i_0_12,plain,
( intersect(X1,X2)
| disjoint(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x52ownhh/lgb.p',i_0_12) ).
cnf(i_0_15,plain,
intersection(X1,X2) = intersection(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x52ownhh/lgb.p',i_0_15) ).
cnf(i_0_4,plain,
( intersect(X1,X2)
| intersect(X1,X3)
| ~ intersect(X1,union(X3,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x52ownhh/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( ~ intersect(X1,X2)
| ~ disjoint(X1,X2) ),
i_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
disjoint(intersection(X1,X2),difference(X1,X2)),
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
~ disjoint(intersection(esk3_0,esk4_0),union(difference(esk3_0,esk4_0),difference(esk4_0,esk3_0))),
i_0_22 ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( intersect(X1,X2)
| disjoint(X1,X2) ),
i_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
~ intersect(intersection(X1,X2),difference(X1,X2)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
intersection(X1,X2) = intersection(X2,X1),
i_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( intersect(X1,X2)
| intersect(X1,X3)
| ~ intersect(X1,union(X3,X2)) ),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
intersect(intersection(esk3_0,esk4_0),union(difference(esk3_0,esk4_0),difference(esk4_0,esk3_0))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
~ intersect(intersection(X1,X2),difference(X2,X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_33]),c_0_37]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SET630+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 19:03:27 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.82/2.39 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.82/2.39 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.82/2.39 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.82/2.39 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_____X1276__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_RG_S04AN
% 7.82/2.39 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.82/2.39 #
% 7.82/2.39 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 7.82/2.39 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.82/2.39
% 7.82/2.39 # Proof found!
% 7.82/2.39 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.82/2.39 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.82/2.39 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.82/2.39
% 7.82/2.39 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.82/2.39 # User time : 0.016 s
% 7.82/2.39 # System time : 0.008 s
% 7.82/2.39 # Total time : 0.024 s
% 7.82/2.39 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.82/2.39
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------