TSTP Solution File: SET626+3 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : SET626+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 04:30:56 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.71s 0.99s
% Output : Refutation 0.71s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11 % Problem : SET626+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 08:54:28 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.71/0.99 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.71/0.99 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.71/0.99 Process 26501 was started by sandbox on n018.cluster.edu,
% 0.71/0.99 Mon Jul 11 08:54:29 2022
% 0.71/0.99 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_26322_n018.cluster.edu".
% 0.71/0.99 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.71/0.99
% 0.71/0.99 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.71/0.99
% 0.71/0.99 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_26322_n018.cluster.edu
% 0.71/0.99
% 0.71/0.99 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.71/0.99 set(auto2).
% 0.71/0.99 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.71/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.71/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.71/0.99 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.71/0.99 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.71/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.71/0.99 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.71/0.99 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.71/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.71/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.71/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.71/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.71/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.71/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.71/0.99 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.71/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.71/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.71/0.99 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.71/0.99 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.71/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.71/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.71/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.71/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.71/0.99 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.71/0.99 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.71/0.99 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.71/0.99 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.71/0.99 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.71/0.99 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.71/0.99 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.71/0.99 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.71/0.99 clear(print_given).
% 0.71/0.99
% 0.71/0.99 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (6 formulas)
% 0.71/0.99
% 0.71/0.99 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.71/0.99
% 0.71/0.99 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.71/0.99
% 0.71/0.99 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.71/0.99
% 0.71/0.99 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.71/0.99 1 (all B all C all D (member(D,intersection(B,C)) <-> member(D,B) & member(D,C))) # label(intersection_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.71/0.99 2 (all B all C (intersect(B,C) <-> (exists D (member(D,B) & member(D,C))))) # label(intersect_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.71/0.99 3 (all B all C intersection(B,C) = intersection(C,B)) # label(commutativity_of_intersection) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.71/0.99 4 (all B all C (intersect(B,C) -> intersect(C,B))) # label(symmetry_of_intersect) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.71/0.99 5 (all B all C (B = C <-> (all D (member(D,B) <-> member(D,C))))) # label(equal_member_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.71/0.99 6 -(all B all C all D (intersect(B,intersection(C,D)) -> intersect(B,C))) # label(prove_th102) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.71/0.99
% 0.71/0.99 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.71/0.99
% 0.71/0.99 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.71/0.99
% 0.71/0.99 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.71/0.99
% 0.71/0.99 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.71/0.99
% 0.71/0.99 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.71/0.99
% 0.71/0.99 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.71/0.99 Function symbol KB weights: c1=1. c2=1. c3=1. intersection=1. f1=1. f2=1.
% 0.71/0.99
% 0.71/0.99 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.71/0.99
% 0.71/0.99 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.71/0.99
% 0.71/0.99 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.71/0.99
% 0.71/0.99 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.71/0.99
% 0.71/0.99 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.71/0.99
% 0.71/0.99 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.71/0.99 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.71/0.99 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.71/0.99
% 0.71/0.99 % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.71/0.99 % Length of proof is 16.
% 0.71/0.99 % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.71/0.99 % Maximum clause weight is 9.000.
% 0.71/0.99 % Given clauses 48.
% 0.71/0.99
% 0.71/0.99 1 (all B all C all D (member(D,intersection(B,C)) <-> member(D,B) & member(D,C))) # label(intersection_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.71/0.99 2 (all B all C (intersect(B,C) <-> (exists D (member(D,B) & member(D,C))))) # label(intersect_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.71/0.99 4 (all B all C (intersect(B,C) -> intersect(C,B))) # label(symmetry_of_intersect) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.71/0.99 6 -(all B all C all D (intersect(B,intersection(C,D)) -> intersect(B,C))) # label(prove_th102) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.71/0.99 7 intersect(c1,intersection(c2,c3)) # label(prove_th102) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(6)].
% 0.71/0.99 10 -intersect(c1,c2) # label(prove_th102) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(6)].
% 0.71/0.99 11 -intersect(A,B) | intersect(B,A) # label(symmetry_of_intersect) # label(axiom). [clausify(4)].
% 0.71/0.99 12 -member(A,intersection(B,C)) | member(A,B) # label(intersection_defn) # label(axiom). [clausify(1)].
% 0.71/0.99 14 -intersect(A,B) | member(f1(A,B),A) # label(intersect_defn) # label(axiom). [clausify(2)].
% 0.71/0.99 15 -intersect(A,B) | member(f1(A,B),B) # label(intersect_defn) # label(axiom). [clausify(2)].
% 0.71/0.99 16 intersect(A,B) | -member(C,A) | -member(C,B) # label(intersect_defn) # label(axiom). [clausify(2)].
% 0.71/0.99 24 -intersect(c2,c1). [ur(11,b,10,a)].
% 0.71/0.99 32 member(f1(c1,intersection(c2,c3)),c1). [resolve(14,a,7,a)].
% 0.71/0.99 33 member(f1(c1,intersection(c2,c3)),intersection(c2,c3)). [resolve(15,a,7,a)].
% 0.71/0.99 62 -member(f1(c1,intersection(c2,c3)),c2). [ur(16,a,24,a,c,32,a)].
% 0.71/0.99 188 $F. [resolve(33,a,12,a),unit_del(a,62)].
% 0.71/0.99
% 0.71/0.99 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.71/0.99 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.71/0.99
% 0.71/0.99 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.71/0.99
% 0.71/0.99 Given=48. Generated=342. Kept=181. proofs=1.
% 0.71/0.99 Usable=48. Sos=124. Demods=1. Limbo=7, Disabled=16. Hints=0.
% 0.71/0.99 Megabytes=0.16.
% 0.71/0.99 User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.71/0.99
% 0.71/0.99 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.71/0.99
% 0.71/0.99 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.71/0.99
% 0.71/0.99 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.71/0.99 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.71/0.99
% 0.71/0.99 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.71/0.99
% 0.71/0.99 Process 26501 exit (max_proofs) Mon Jul 11 08:54:29 2022
% 0.71/0.99 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------