TSTP Solution File: SET624+3 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SET624+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:23:10 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   94 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   93 (  36   ~;  45   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   67 (   5 sgn;  27   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(intersect_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( intersect(X1,X2)
    <=> ? [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
          & member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.QAjMYjIb8R/E---3.1_4573.p',intersect_defn) ).

fof(union_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( member(X3,union(X1,X2))
    <=> ( member(X3,X1)
        | member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.QAjMYjIb8R/E---3.1_4573.p',union_defn) ).

fof(prove_intersect_with_union,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( intersect(X1,union(X2,X3))
    <=> ( intersect(X1,X2)
        | intersect(X1,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.QAjMYjIb8R/E---3.1_4573.p',prove_intersect_with_union) ).

fof(symmetry_of_intersect,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( intersect(X1,X2)
     => intersect(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.QAjMYjIb8R/E---3.1_4573.p',symmetry_of_intersect) ).

fof(commutativity_of_union,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : union(X1,X2) = union(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.QAjMYjIb8R/E---3.1_4573.p',commutativity_of_union) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X7,X8,X10,X11,X12] :
      ( ( member(esk4_2(X7,X8),X7)
        | ~ intersect(X7,X8) )
      & ( member(esk4_2(X7,X8),X8)
        | ~ intersect(X7,X8) )
      & ( ~ member(X12,X10)
        | ~ member(X12,X11)
        | intersect(X10,X11) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[intersect_defn])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( intersect(X2,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( member(esk4_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ intersect(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X15,X16,X17] :
      ( ( ~ member(X17,union(X15,X16))
        | member(X17,X15)
        | member(X17,X16) )
      & ( ~ member(X17,X15)
        | member(X17,union(X15,X16)) )
      & ( ~ member(X17,X16)
        | member(X17,union(X15,X16)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[union_defn])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( intersect(X1,X2)
    | ~ intersect(X3,X2)
    | ~ member(esk4_2(X3,X2),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( member(X1,union(X3,X2))
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( intersect(X1,union(X2,X3))
      <=> ( intersect(X1,X2)
          | intersect(X1,X3) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_intersect_with_union]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X13,X14] :
      ( ~ intersect(X13,X14)
      | intersect(X14,X13) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[symmetry_of_intersect])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( intersect(union(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ intersect(X4,X3)
    | ~ member(esk4_2(X4,X3),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( member(esk4_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ intersect(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ~ intersect(esk1_0,esk2_0)
      | ~ intersect(esk1_0,union(esk2_0,esk3_0)) )
    & ( ~ intersect(esk1_0,esk3_0)
      | ~ intersect(esk1_0,union(esk2_0,esk3_0)) )
    & ( intersect(esk1_0,union(esk2_0,esk3_0))
      | intersect(esk1_0,esk2_0)
      | intersect(esk1_0,esk3_0) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( intersect(X2,X1)
    | ~ intersect(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( intersect(union(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ intersect(X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ intersect(esk1_0,esk3_0)
    | ~ intersect(esk1_0,union(esk2_0,esk3_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( intersect(X1,union(X2,X3))
    | ~ intersect(X3,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,union(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( intersect(esk1_0,union(esk2_0,esk3_0))
    | intersect(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    | intersect(esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ~ intersect(esk1_0,esk3_0),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( member(esk4_2(X1,union(X2,X3)),X2)
    | member(esk4_2(X1,union(X2,X3)),X3)
    | ~ intersect(X1,union(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( intersect(esk1_0,union(esk2_0,esk3_0))
    | intersect(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( intersect(X1,X2)
    | ~ intersect(X2,X3)
    | ~ member(esk4_2(X2,X3),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( intersect(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    | member(esk4_2(esk1_0,union(esk2_0,esk3_0)),esk3_0)
    | member(esk4_2(esk1_0,union(esk2_0,esk3_0)),esk2_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( intersect(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    | intersect(esk3_0,esk1_0)
    | member(esk4_2(esk1_0,union(esk2_0,esk3_0)),esk2_0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( intersect(esk3_0,esk1_0)
    | intersect(esk2_0,esk1_0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_27]),c_0_24]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    intersect(esk2_0,esk1_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_28]),c_0_22]) ).

fof(c_0_30,plain,
    ! [X18,X19] : union(X18,X19) = union(X19,X18),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_union]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ intersect(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    | ~ intersect(esk1_0,union(esk2_0,esk3_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    intersect(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    union(X1,X2) = union(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ~ intersect(esk1_0,union(esk2_0,esk3_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32])]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( intersect(X1,union(X2,X3))
    | ~ intersect(X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_29])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.08  % Problem    : SET624+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.07/0.09  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.08/0.27  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.27  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.27  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.27  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.27  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.28  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.08/0.28  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.08/0.28  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 17:25:27 EDT 2023
% 0.08/0.28  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.12/0.40  Running first-order model finding
% 0.12/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.QAjMYjIb8R/E---3.1_4573.p
% 0.12/0.43  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.12/0.43  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.43  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.43  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.43  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  # new_bool_1 with pid 4709 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.43  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.12/0.43  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.43  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.43  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.43  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.12/0.43  # Search class: FGHSF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.43  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.43  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 4716 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.43  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.12/0.43  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.43  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.43  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.43  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.12/0.43  # Search class: FGHSF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.43  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.43  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.43  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.43  
% 0.12/0.43  # Proof found!
% 0.12/0.43  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/0.43  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.43  # Parsed axioms                        : 6
% 0.12/0.43  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.12/0.43  # Initial clauses                      : 15
% 0.12/0.43  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.12/0.43  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 13
% 0.12/0.43  # Processed clauses                    : 238
% 0.12/0.43  # ...of these trivial                  : 60
% 0.12/0.43  # ...subsumed                          : 66
% 0.12/0.43  # ...remaining for further processing  : 112
% 0.12/0.43  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.12/0.43  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.12/0.43  # Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.12/0.43  # Backward-rewritten                   : 15
% 0.12/0.43  # Generated clauses                    : 824
% 0.12/0.43  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 579
% 0.12/0.43  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.12/0.43  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 6
% 0.12/0.43  # Paramodulations                      : 807
% 0.12/0.43  # Factorizations                       : 14
% 0.12/0.43  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.12/0.43  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.12/0.43  # Total rewrite steps                  : 298
% 0.12/0.43  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.12/0.43  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.12/0.43  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.43  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.12/0.43  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.43  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.12/0.43  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43  # Current number of processed clauses  : 79
% 0.12/0.43  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 31
% 0.12/0.43  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.12/0.43  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.12/0.43  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 44
% 0.12/0.43  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 355
% 0.12/0.43  # ...number of literals in the above   : 964
% 0.12/0.43  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.12/0.43  # Current number of archived clauses   : 33
% 0.12/0.43  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 927
% 0.12/0.43  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 856
% 0.12/0.43  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 72
% 0.12/0.43  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 41
% 0.12/0.43  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.12/0.43  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 7
% 0.12/0.43  # BW rewrite match successes           : 7
% 0.12/0.43  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.12/0.43  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.12/0.43  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 9938
% 0.12/0.43  
% 0.12/0.43  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.43  # User time                : 0.014 s
% 0.12/0.43  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.12/0.43  # Total time               : 0.019 s
% 0.12/0.43  # Maximum resident set size: 1744 pages
% 0.12/0.43  
% 0.12/0.43  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.43  # User time                : 0.015 s
% 0.12/0.43  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.12/0.43  # Total time               : 0.023 s
% 0.12/0.43  # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 0.12/0.43  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------