TSTP Solution File: SET619+3 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SET619+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:56:43 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 19.16s 7.13s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 19.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   18
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (  23 unt;  11 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   23 (  22 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   18 (   9   >;   9   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   44 (;  44   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ subset > member > union > symmetric_difference > intersection > difference > #nlpp > #skF_3 > #skF_5 > #skF_4 > #skF_2 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(intersection,type,
    intersection: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(union,type,
    union: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(symmetric_difference,type,
    symmetric_difference: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': $i ).

tff(subset,type,
    subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(member,type,
    member: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(difference,type,
    difference: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_66,axiom,
    ! [B,C] : ( intersection(B,C) = intersection(C,B) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_intersection) ).

tff(f_39,axiom,
    ! [B,C] : ( union(intersection(B,C),difference(B,C)) = B ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',union_intersection_difference) ).

tff(f_36,axiom,
    ! [B,C] : ( union(B,intersection(B,C)) = B ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',union_intersection) ).

tff(f_33,axiom,
    ! [B,C,D] : ( union(union(B,C),D) = union(B,union(C,D)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_union) ).

tff(f_30,axiom,
    ! [B,C] : ( symmetric_difference(B,C) = union(difference(B,C),difference(C,B)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',symmetric_difference_defn) ).

tff(f_63,axiom,
    ! [B,C] : ( union(B,C) = union(C,B) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_union) ).

tff(f_92,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [B,C] : ( union(B,C) = union(symmetric_difference(B,C),intersection(B,C)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_th95) ).

tff(c_30,plain,
    ! [C_21,B_20] : ( intersection(C_21,B_20) = intersection(B_20,C_21) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_66]) ).

tff(c_214,plain,
    ! [B_49,C_50] : ( union(intersection(B_49,C_50),difference(B_49,C_50)) = B_49 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_39]) ).

tff(c_238,plain,
    ! [C_21,B_20] : ( union(intersection(C_21,B_20),difference(B_20,C_21)) = B_20 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_30,c_214]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    ! [B_6,C_7] : ( union(B_6,intersection(B_6,C_7)) = B_6 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_36]) ).

tff(c_422,plain,
    ! [B_78,C_79,D_80] : ( union(union(B_78,C_79),D_80) = union(B_78,union(C_79,D_80)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_33]) ).

tff(c_622,plain,
    ! [B_92,C_93,D_94] : ( union(B_92,union(intersection(B_92,C_93),D_94)) = union(B_92,D_94) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6,c_422]) ).

tff(c_659,plain,
    ! [C_21,B_20] : ( union(C_21,difference(B_20,C_21)) = union(C_21,B_20) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_238,c_622]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [B_1,C_2] : ( union(difference(B_1,C_2),difference(C_2,B_1)) = symmetric_difference(B_1,C_2) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_30]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    ! [B_8,C_9] : ( union(intersection(B_8,C_9),difference(B_8,C_9)) = B_8 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_39]) ).

tff(c_9709,plain,
    ! [B_274,C_275,D_276] : ( union(intersection(B_274,C_275),union(difference(B_274,C_275),D_276)) = union(B_274,D_276) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_8,c_422]) ).

tff(c_9983,plain,
    ! [B_1,C_2] : ( union(intersection(B_1,C_2),symmetric_difference(B_1,C_2)) = union(B_1,difference(C_2,B_1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_9709]) ).

tff(c_10049,plain,
    ! [B_1,C_2] : ( union(intersection(B_1,C_2),symmetric_difference(B_1,C_2)) = union(B_1,C_2) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_659,c_9983]) ).

tff(c_28,plain,
    ! [C_19,B_18] : ( union(C_19,B_18) = union(B_18,C_19) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_63]) ).

tff(c_54,plain,
    union(symmetric_difference('#skF_4','#skF_5'),intersection('#skF_4','#skF_5')) != union('#skF_4','#skF_5'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_92]) ).

tff(c_55,plain,
    union(intersection('#skF_4','#skF_5'),symmetric_difference('#skF_4','#skF_5')) != union('#skF_4','#skF_5'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_28,c_54]) ).

tff(c_38020,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_10049,c_55]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SET619+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 16:47:18 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 19.16/7.13  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 19.16/7.14  
% 19.16/7.14  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 19.26/7.16  
% 19.26/7.16  Inference rules
% 19.26/7.16  ----------------------
% 19.26/7.16  #Ref     : 0
% 19.26/7.16  #Sup     : 9913
% 19.26/7.16  #Fact    : 6
% 19.26/7.16  #Define  : 0
% 19.26/7.16  #Split   : 0
% 19.26/7.16  #Chain   : 0
% 19.26/7.16  #Close   : 0
% 19.26/7.16  
% 19.26/7.16  Ordering : KBO
% 19.26/7.16  
% 19.26/7.16  Simplification rules
% 19.26/7.16  ----------------------
% 19.26/7.16  #Subsume      : 753
% 19.26/7.16  #Demod        : 7815
% 19.26/7.16  #Tautology    : 3034
% 19.26/7.16  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 19.26/7.16  #BackRed      : 1
% 19.26/7.16  
% 19.26/7.16  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 19.26/7.16  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 19.26/7.16  
% 19.26/7.16  Timing (in seconds)
% 19.26/7.16  ----------------------
% 19.26/7.17  Preprocessing        : 0.51
% 19.26/7.17  Parsing              : 0.26
% 19.26/7.17  CNF conversion       : 0.04
% 19.26/7.17  Main loop            : 5.52
% 19.26/7.17  Inferencing          : 0.90
% 19.26/7.17  Reduction            : 3.14
% 19.26/7.17  Demodulation         : 2.84
% 19.26/7.17  BG Simplification    : 0.12
% 19.26/7.17  Subsumption          : 1.03
% 19.26/7.17  Abstraction          : 0.11
% 19.26/7.17  MUC search           : 0.00
% 19.26/7.17  Cooper               : 0.00
% 19.26/7.17  Total                : 6.07
% 19.26/7.17  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 19.26/7.17  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 19.26/7.17  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 19.26/7.17  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------