TSTP Solution File: SET618+3 by Metis---2.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Metis---2.4
% Problem  : SET618+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 03:36:02 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.35s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   38 (  29 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   51 (  50 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   31 (  18   ~;  13   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (   0 sgn  15   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(symmetric_difference_defn,axiom,
    ! [B,C] : symmetric_difference(B,C) = union(difference(B,C),difference(C,B)) ).

fof(idempotency_of_union,axiom,
    ! [B] : union(B,B) = B ).

fof(self_difference_is_empty_set,axiom,
    ! [B] : difference(B,B) = empty_set ).

fof(prove_th93,conjecture,
    ! [B] : symmetric_difference(B,B) = empty_set ).

fof(subgoal_0,plain,
    ! [B] : symmetric_difference(B,B) = empty_set,
    inference(strip,[],[prove_th93]) ).

fof(negate_0_0,plain,
    ~ ! [B] : symmetric_difference(B,B) = empty_set,
    inference(negate,[],[subgoal_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_0,plain,
    ? [B] : symmetric_difference(B,B) != empty_set,
    inference(canonicalize,[],[negate_0_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_1,plain,
    symmetric_difference(skolemFOFtoCNF_B,skolemFOFtoCNF_B) != empty_set,
    inference(skolemize,[],[normalize_0_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_2,plain,
    ! [B] : union(B,B) = B,
    inference(canonicalize,[],[idempotency_of_union]) ).

fof(normalize_0_3,plain,
    ! [B] : union(B,B) = B,
    inference(specialize,[],[normalize_0_2]) ).

fof(normalize_0_4,plain,
    ! [B,C] : symmetric_difference(B,C) = union(difference(B,C),difference(C,B)),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[symmetric_difference_defn]) ).

fof(normalize_0_5,plain,
    ! [B,C] : symmetric_difference(B,C) = union(difference(B,C),difference(C,B)),
    inference(specialize,[],[normalize_0_4]) ).

fof(normalize_0_6,plain,
    ! [B] : difference(B,B) = empty_set,
    inference(canonicalize,[],[self_difference_is_empty_set]) ).

fof(normalize_0_7,plain,
    ! [B] : difference(B,B) = empty_set,
    inference(specialize,[],[normalize_0_6]) ).

cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
    symmetric_difference(skolemFOFtoCNF_B,skolemFOFtoCNF_B) != empty_set,
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_1]) ).

cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
    union(B,B) = B,
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_3]) ).

cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
    union(difference(X_11,X_11),difference(X_11,X_11)) = difference(X_11,X_11),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_1:[bind(B,$fot(difference(X_11,X_11)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
    symmetric_difference(B,C) = union(difference(B,C),difference(C,B)),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_5]) ).

cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
    symmetric_difference(X_11,X_11) = union(difference(X_11,X_11),difference(X_11,X_11)),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_3:[bind(B,$fot(X_11)),bind(C,$fot(X_11))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
    X = X,
    introduced(tautology,[refl,[$fot(X)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
    ( X != X
    | X != Y
    | Y = X ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(X,X) ),[0],$fot(Y)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
    ( X != Y
    | Y = X ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(X,X) )],[refute_0_5,refute_0_6]) ).

cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
    ( symmetric_difference(X_11,X_11) != union(difference(X_11,X_11),difference(X_11,X_11))
    | union(difference(X_11,X_11),difference(X_11,X_11)) = symmetric_difference(X_11,X_11) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_7:[bind(X,$fot(symmetric_difference(X_11,X_11))),bind(Y,$fot(union(difference(X_11,X_11),difference(X_11,X_11))))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
    union(difference(X_11,X_11),difference(X_11,X_11)) = symmetric_difference(X_11,X_11),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(symmetric_difference(X_11,X_11),union(difference(X_11,X_11),difference(X_11,X_11))) )],[refute_0_4,refute_0_8]) ).

cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
    ( union(difference(X_11,X_11),difference(X_11,X_11)) != difference(X_11,X_11)
    | union(difference(X_11,X_11),difference(X_11,X_11)) != symmetric_difference(X_11,X_11)
    | symmetric_difference(X_11,X_11) = difference(X_11,X_11) ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(union(difference(X_11,X_11),difference(X_11,X_11)),difference(X_11,X_11)) ),[0],$fot(symmetric_difference(X_11,X_11))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
    ( union(difference(X_11,X_11),difference(X_11,X_11)) != difference(X_11,X_11)
    | symmetric_difference(X_11,X_11) = difference(X_11,X_11) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(union(difference(X_11,X_11),difference(X_11,X_11)),symmetric_difference(X_11,X_11)) )],[refute_0_9,refute_0_10]) ).

cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
    symmetric_difference(X_11,X_11) = difference(X_11,X_11),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(union(difference(X_11,X_11),difference(X_11,X_11)),difference(X_11,X_11)) )],[refute_0_2,refute_0_11]) ).

cnf(refute_0_13,plain,
    difference(B,B) = empty_set,
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_7]) ).

cnf(refute_0_14,plain,
    difference(X_11,X_11) = empty_set,
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_13:[bind(B,$fot(X_11))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_15,plain,
    ( difference(X_11,X_11) != empty_set
    | symmetric_difference(X_11,X_11) != difference(X_11,X_11)
    | symmetric_difference(X_11,X_11) = empty_set ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(symmetric_difference(X_11,X_11),difference(X_11,X_11)) ),[1],$fot(empty_set)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_16,plain,
    ( symmetric_difference(X_11,X_11) != difference(X_11,X_11)
    | symmetric_difference(X_11,X_11) = empty_set ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(difference(X_11,X_11),empty_set) )],[refute_0_14,refute_0_15]) ).

cnf(refute_0_17,plain,
    symmetric_difference(X_11,X_11) = empty_set,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(symmetric_difference(X_11,X_11),difference(X_11,X_11)) )],[refute_0_12,refute_0_16]) ).

cnf(refute_0_18,plain,
    symmetric_difference(skolemFOFtoCNF_B,skolemFOFtoCNF_B) = empty_set,
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_17:[bind(X_11,$fot(skolemFOFtoCNF_B))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_19,plain,
    ( empty_set != empty_set
    | symmetric_difference(skolemFOFtoCNF_B,skolemFOFtoCNF_B) != empty_set
    | symmetric_difference(skolemFOFtoCNF_B,skolemFOFtoCNF_B) = empty_set ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(symmetric_difference(skolemFOFtoCNF_B,skolemFOFtoCNF_B),empty_set) ),[1],$fot(empty_set)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_20,plain,
    ( empty_set != empty_set
    | symmetric_difference(skolemFOFtoCNF_B,skolemFOFtoCNF_B) = empty_set ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(symmetric_difference(skolemFOFtoCNF_B,skolemFOFtoCNF_B),empty_set) )],[refute_0_18,refute_0_19]) ).

cnf(refute_0_21,plain,
    empty_set != empty_set,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(symmetric_difference(skolemFOFtoCNF_B,skolemFOFtoCNF_B),empty_set) )],[refute_0_20,refute_0_0]) ).

cnf(refute_0_22,plain,
    empty_set = empty_set,
    introduced(tautology,[refl,[$fot(empty_set)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_23,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(empty_set,empty_set) )],[refute_0_22,refute_0_21]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SET618+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 06:27:46 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.34  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.13/0.35  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.35  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------