TSTP Solution File: SET615^5 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SET615^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 02:54:57 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 0.53s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : SET615^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Mon May 20 11:55:08 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.52 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.52 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.53 # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.22/0.53 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSN.
% 0.22/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.53 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.53 # Starting post_as_ho10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53 # Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53 # new_bool_9 with pid 10030 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Result found by new_bool_9
% 0.22/0.53 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSN.
% 0.22/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.53 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.53 # Starting post_as_ho10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53 # Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.53 # Search class: HUUPF-FFSF00-MSSFFFNN
% 0.22/0.53 # partial match(1): HUUPF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
% 0.22/0.53 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.53 # Starting new_ho_10 with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53 # new_ho_10 with pid 10032 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.22/0.53 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSN.
% 0.22/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.53 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.53 # Starting post_as_ho10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53 # Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.53 # Search class: HUUPF-FFSF00-MSSFFFNN
% 0.22/0.53 # partial match(1): HUUPF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
% 0.22/0.53 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.53 # Starting new_ho_10 with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.53 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.53
% 0.22/0.53 # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.53 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.53 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.22/0.53 thf(decl_sort1, type, a: $tType).
% 0.22/0.53 thf(decl_22, type, epred1_0: a > $o).
% 0.22/0.53 thf(decl_23, type, epred2_0: a > $o).
% 0.22/0.53 thf(decl_24, type, epred3_0: a > $o).
% 0.22/0.53 thf(decl_25, type, esk1_0: a).
% 0.22/0.53 thf(cBOOL_PROP_89_pme, conjecture, ![X1:a > $o, X2:a > $o, X3:a > $o]:(((^[X4:a]:((((X1 @ X4)|(X2 @ X4))&~((X3 @ X4)))))=(^[X5:a]:((((X1 @ X5)&~((X3 @ X5)))|((X2 @ X5)&~((X3 @ X5)))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cBOOL_PROP_89_pme)).
% 0.22/0.53 thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:a > $o, X2:a > $o, X3:a > $o]:(((^[Z0/* 8 */:a]:(((X1 @ Z0|X2 @ Z0)&~(X3 @ Z0))))=(^[Z0/* 9 */:a]:(((X1 @ Z0&~(X3 @ Z0))|(X2 @ Z0&~(X3 @ Z0)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cBOOL_PROP_89_pme])])).
% 0.22/0.53 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ((^[Z0/* 8 */:a]:(((epred1_0 @ Z0|epred2_0 @ Z0)&~(epred3_0 @ Z0))))!=(^[Z0/* 9 */:a]:(((epred1_0 @ Z0&~(epred3_0 @ Z0))|(epred2_0 @ Z0&~(epred3_0 @ Z0)))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])).
% 0.22/0.53 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ((^[Z0/* 8 */:a]:((((epred1_0 @ Z0)|(epred2_0 @ Z0))&~((epred3_0 @ Z0)))))!=(^[Z0/* 9 */:a]:((((epred1_0 @ Z0)&~((epred3_0 @ Z0)))|((epred2_0 @ Z0)&~((epred3_0 @ Z0))))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.22/0.53 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ((((epred1_0 @ esk1_0)&~((epred3_0 @ esk1_0)))|((epred2_0 @ esk1_0)&~((epred3_0 @ esk1_0))))<~>(((epred1_0 @ esk1_0)|(epred2_0 @ esk1_0))&~((epred3_0 @ esk1_0)))), inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
% 0.22/0.53 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ~((epred3_0 @ esk1_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])).
% 0.22/0.53 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ~((epred1_0 @ esk1_0)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]), c_0_5])).
% 0.22/0.53 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ~((epred2_0 @ esk1_0)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]), c_0_5])).
% 0.22/0.53 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]), c_0_6]), c_0_7]), ['proof']).
% 0.22/0.53 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.22/0.53 # Parsed axioms : 2
% 0.22/0.53 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1
% 0.22/0.53 # Initial clauses : 1
% 0.22/0.53 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1
% 0.22/0.53 # Processed clauses : 10
% 0.22/0.53 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # ...subsumed : 3
% 0.22/0.53 # ...remaining for further processing : 6
% 0.22/0.53 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Generated clauses : 13
% 0.22/0.53 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 13
% 0.22/0.53 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # NegExts : 1
% 0.22/0.53 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.53 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.53 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.53 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.53 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.53 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.53 # Current number of processed clauses : 4
% 0.22/0.53 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.22/0.53 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5
% 0.22/0.53 # ...number of literals in the above : 15
% 0.22/0.53 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.22/0.53 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.22/0.53 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Condensation attempts : 10
% 0.22/0.53 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Termbank termtop insertions : 754
% 0.22/0.53 # Search garbage collected termcells : 64
% 0.22/0.53
% 0.22/0.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.53 # User time : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.53 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.53 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.53 # Maximum resident set size: 1796 pages
% 0.22/0.53
% 0.22/0.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.53 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.53 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.22/0.53 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.22/0.53 # Maximum resident set size: 1720 pages
% 0.22/0.53 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.53 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------