TSTP Solution File: SET607+3 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SET607+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:52:26 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 2.40s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 42 ( 16 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 98 ( 14 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 86 ( 30 ~; 41 |; 10 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 114 ( 19 sgn 40 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(union_defn,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( member(X3,union(X1,X2))
<=> ( member(X3,X1)
| member(X3,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',union_defn) ).
fof(subset_defn,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( subset(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X3] :
( member(X3,X1)
=> member(X3,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',subset_defn) ).
fof(difference_defn,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( member(X3,difference(X1,X2))
<=> ( member(X3,X1)
& ~ member(X3,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',difference_defn) ).
fof(commutativity_of_union,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : union(X1,X2) = union(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_union) ).
fof(equal_defn,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( X1 = X2
<=> ( subset(X1,X2)
& subset(X2,X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',equal_defn) ).
fof(prove_th79,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] : union(X1,difference(X2,X1)) = union(X1,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',prove_th79) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5,X6] :
( ( ~ member(X6,union(X4,X5))
| member(X6,X4)
| member(X6,X5) )
& ( ~ member(X6,X4)
| member(X6,union(X4,X5)) )
& ( ~ member(X6,X5)
| member(X6,union(X4,X5)) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[union_defn])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5] :
( ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
| ~ member(X6,X4)
| member(X6,X5) )
& ( member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X4)
| subset(X4,X5) )
& ( ~ member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5)
| subset(X4,X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset_defn])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5,X6] :
( ( member(X6,X4)
| ~ member(X6,difference(X4,X5)) )
& ( ~ member(X6,X5)
| ~ member(X6,difference(X4,X5)) )
& ( ~ member(X6,X4)
| member(X6,X5)
| member(X6,difference(X4,X5)) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[difference_defn])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( member(X1,X2)
| member(X1,X3)
| ~ member(X1,union(X3,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,difference(X2,X3)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( subset(union(X1,X2),X3)
| member(esk1_2(union(X1,X2),X3),X1)
| member(esk1_2(union(X1,X2),X3),X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( member(X1,union(X2,X3))
| ~ member(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( member(X1,union(X2,X3))
| ~ member(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( subset(union(X1,difference(X2,X3)),X4)
| member(esk1_2(union(X1,difference(X2,X3)),X4),X1)
| member(esk1_2(union(X1,difference(X2,X3)),X4),X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( subset(X1,union(X2,X3))
| ~ member(esk1_2(X1,union(X2,X3)),X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X3,X4] : union(X3,X4) = union(X4,X3),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_union]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( subset(X1,union(X2,X3))
| ~ member(esk1_2(X1,union(X2,X3)),X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( member(X1,difference(X2,X3))
| member(X1,X3)
| ~ member(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X3,X4,X3,X4] :
( ( subset(X3,X4)
| X3 != X4 )
& ( subset(X4,X3)
| X3 != X4 )
& ( ~ subset(X3,X4)
| ~ subset(X4,X3)
| X3 = X4 ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[equal_defn])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( subset(union(X1,difference(X1,X2)),X3)
| member(esk1_2(union(X1,difference(X1,X2)),X3),X1) ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
subset(X1,union(X2,X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
union(X1,X2) = union(X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( subset(X1,union(difference(X2,X3),X4))
| member(esk1_2(X1,union(difference(X2,X3),X4)),X3)
| ~ member(esk1_2(X1,union(difference(X2,X3),X4)),X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( subset(union(X1,X2),union(X3,X2))
| member(esk1_2(union(X1,X2),union(X3,X2)),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( subset(X1,union(union(X2,X3),X4))
| ~ member(esk1_2(X1,union(union(X2,X3),X4)),X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( subset(union(X1,X2),union(X3,X1))
| member(esk1_2(union(X1,X2),union(X3,X1)),X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ subset(X2,X1)
| ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
subset(union(X1,difference(X1,X2)),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
subset(X1,union(X1,X2)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
fof(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] : union(X1,difference(X2,X1)) = union(X1,X2),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_th79]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( subset(union(X1,X2),union(difference(X1,X3),X2))
| member(esk1_2(union(X1,X2),union(difference(X1,X3),X2)),X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
subset(union(X1,X2),union(union(X3,X2),X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
union(X1,difference(X1,X2)) = X1,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31])]) ).
fof(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
union(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk3_0)) != union(esk3_0,esk4_0),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_32])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
subset(union(X1,X2),union(X2,difference(X1,X2))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_33]),c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
subset(union(X1,difference(X2,X3)),union(X2,X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
union(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk3_0)) != union(esk3_0,esk4_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
union(X1,difference(X2,X1)) = union(X2,X1),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_37]),c_0_38])]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_24])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SET607+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 14:43:46 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/2.40 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_63dc1b1eb7d762c2f3686774d32795976f981b97 for 23 seconds:
% 0.22/2.40 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.22/2.40
% 0.22/2.40 # Proof found!
% 0.22/2.40 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/2.40 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/2.40 # Proof object total steps : 42
% 0.22/2.40 # Proof object clause steps : 29
% 0.22/2.40 # Proof object formula steps : 13
% 0.22/2.40 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.22/2.40 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.22/2.40 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.22/2.40 # Proof object initial clauses used : 10
% 0.22/2.40 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 0.22/2.40 # Proof object generating inferences : 18
% 0.22/2.40 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 8
% 0.22/2.40 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.22/2.40 # Parsed axioms : 8
% 0.22/2.40 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.22/2.40 # Initial clauses : 19
% 0.22/2.40 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.22/2.40 # Initial clauses in saturation : 17
% 0.22/2.40 # Processed clauses : 7319
% 0.22/2.40 # ...of these trivial : 297
% 0.22/2.40 # ...subsumed : 6059
% 0.22/2.40 # ...remaining for further processing : 963
% 0.22/2.40 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 0.22/2.40 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 61598
% 0.22/2.40 # Backward-subsumed : 5
% 0.22/2.40 # Backward-rewritten : 46
% 0.22/2.40 # Generated clauses : 161316
% 0.22/2.40 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 149696
% 0.22/2.40 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 259
% 0.22/2.40 # Paramodulations : 160218
% 0.22/2.40 # Factorizations : 1096
% 0.22/2.40 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.22/2.40 # Current number of processed clauses : 910
% 0.22/2.40 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 118
% 0.22/2.40 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 6
% 0.22/2.40 # Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.22/2.40 # Non-unit-clauses : 781
% 0.22/2.40 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 72384
% 0.22/2.40 # ...number of literals in the above : 199274
% 0.22/2.40 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/2.40 # Current number of archived clauses : 51
% 0.22/2.40 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 195242
% 0.22/2.40 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 82195
% 0.22/2.40 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2340
% 0.22/2.40 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16974
% 0.22/2.40 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 370
% 0.22/2.40 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1411
% 0.22/2.40 # BW rewrite match successes : 47
% 0.22/2.40 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/2.40 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/2.40 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4069318
% 0.22/2.40
% 0.22/2.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/2.40 # User time : 1.849 s
% 0.22/2.40 # System time : 0.056 s
% 0.22/2.40 # Total time : 1.905 s
% 0.22/2.40 # Maximum resident set size: 130816 pages
% 0.22/23.39 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.22/23.39 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.22/23.40 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.22/23.41 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.41 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.41 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.41 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.41 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.41 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.41 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.41 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.41 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.41 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------