TSTP Solution File: SET603+3 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SET603+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:56:40 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 10.17s 3.55s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 10.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (   8 unt;  12 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   38 (   6 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   30 (  12   ~;  12   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   18 (  10   >;   8   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   37 (;  37   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ subset > member > empty > difference > #nlpp > empty_set > #skF_7 > #skF_3 > #skF_2 > #skF_1 > #skF_5 > #skF_6 > #skF_4

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(subset,type,
    subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(member,type,
    member: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(empty,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

tff(empty_set,type,
    empty_set: $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(difference,type,
    difference: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_69,axiom,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( subset(B,C)
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( member(D,B)
         => member(D,C) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subset_defn) ).

tff(f_42,axiom,
    ! [B,C,D] :
      ( member(D,difference(B,C))
    <=> ( member(D,B)
        & ~ member(D,C) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',difference_defn) ).

tff(f_46,axiom,
    ! [B] : ~ member(B,empty_set),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',empty_set_defn) ).

tff(f_53,axiom,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( ( B = C )
    <=> ( subset(B,C)
        & subset(C,B) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equal_defn) ).

tff(f_83,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [B] : ( difference(B,empty_set) = B ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_th74) ).

tff(c_40,plain,
    ! [B_15,C_16] :
      ( member('#skF_5'(B_15,C_16),B_15)
      | subset(B_15,C_16) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_69]) ).

tff(c_190,plain,
    ! [D_56,B_57,C_58] :
      ( member(D_56,difference(B_57,C_58))
      | member(D_56,C_58)
      | ~ member(D_56,B_57) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_42]) ).

tff(c_38,plain,
    ! [B_15,C_16] :
      ( ~ member('#skF_5'(B_15,C_16),C_16)
      | subset(B_15,C_16) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_69]) ).

tff(c_13994,plain,
    ! [B_559,B_560,C_561] :
      ( subset(B_559,difference(B_560,C_561))
      | member('#skF_5'(B_559,difference(B_560,C_561)),C_561)
      | ~ member('#skF_5'(B_559,difference(B_560,C_561)),B_560) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_190,c_38]) ).

tff(c_14040,plain,
    ! [B_562,C_563] :
      ( member('#skF_5'(B_562,difference(B_562,C_563)),C_563)
      | subset(B_562,difference(B_562,C_563)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_40,c_13994]) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    ! [B_7] : ~ member(B_7,empty_set),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_46]) ).

tff(c_14148,plain,
    ! [B_564] : subset(B_564,difference(B_564,empty_set)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_14040,c_16]) ).

tff(c_76,plain,
    ! [D_35,B_36,C_37] :
      ( member(D_35,B_36)
      | ~ member(D_35,difference(B_36,C_37)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_42]) ).

tff(c_1745,plain,
    ! [B_179,C_180,C_181] :
      ( member('#skF_5'(difference(B_179,C_180),C_181),B_179)
      | subset(difference(B_179,C_180),C_181) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_40,c_76]) ).

tff(c_1799,plain,
    ! [B_182,C_183] : subset(difference(B_182,C_183),B_182),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1745,c_38]) ).

tff(c_18,plain,
    ! [C_9,B_8] :
      ( ( C_9 = B_8 )
      | ~ subset(C_9,B_8)
      | ~ subset(B_8,C_9) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_53]) ).

tff(c_1873,plain,
    ! [B_182,C_183] :
      ( ( difference(B_182,C_183) = B_182 )
      | ~ subset(B_182,difference(B_182,C_183)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1799,c_18]) ).

tff(c_14331,plain,
    ! [B_564] : ( difference(B_564,empty_set) = B_564 ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_14148,c_1873]) ).

tff(c_48,plain,
    difference('#skF_7',empty_set) != '#skF_7',
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_83]) ).

tff(c_14351,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_14331,c_48]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SET603+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 16:38:49 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 10.17/3.55  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 10.17/3.55  
% 10.17/3.55  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 10.17/3.59  
% 10.17/3.59  Inference rules
% 10.17/3.59  ----------------------
% 10.17/3.59  #Ref     : 0
% 10.17/3.59  #Sup     : 3687
% 10.17/3.59  #Fact    : 0
% 10.17/3.59  #Define  : 0
% 10.17/3.59  #Split   : 2
% 10.17/3.59  #Chain   : 0
% 10.17/3.59  #Close   : 0
% 10.17/3.59  
% 10.17/3.59  Ordering : KBO
% 10.17/3.59  
% 10.17/3.59  Simplification rules
% 10.17/3.59  ----------------------
% 10.17/3.59  #Subsume      : 1748
% 10.17/3.59  #Demod        : 1368
% 10.17/3.59  #Tautology    : 791
% 10.17/3.59  #SimpNegUnit  : 105
% 10.17/3.59  #BackRed      : 24
% 10.17/3.59  
% 10.17/3.59  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 10.17/3.59  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 10.17/3.59  
% 10.17/3.59  Timing (in seconds)
% 10.17/3.59  ----------------------
% 10.17/3.59  Preprocessing        : 0.48
% 10.17/3.59  Parsing              : 0.25
% 10.17/3.59  CNF conversion       : 0.04
% 10.17/3.59  Main loop            : 1.94
% 10.17/3.59  Inferencing          : 0.68
% 10.17/3.59  Reduction            : 0.45
% 10.17/3.59  Demodulation         : 0.29
% 10.17/3.59  BG Simplification    : 0.05
% 10.17/3.59  Subsumption          : 0.64
% 10.17/3.59  Abstraction          : 0.07
% 10.17/3.59  MUC search           : 0.00
% 10.17/3.59  Cooper               : 0.00
% 10.17/3.59  Total                : 2.47
% 10.17/3.59  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 10.17/3.59  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 10.17/3.59  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 10.17/3.59  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------