TSTP Solution File: SET602+3 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : SET602+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:02:22 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.34s
% Output : Proof 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
~ sPE(difference(sK2,sK2),empty_set),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_self_difference_is_empty_set)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
( ~ subset(sK2,sK2)
| sPE(difference(sK2,sK2),empty_set) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',difference_empty_set)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
subset(sK2,sK2),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_of_subset)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SET602+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jul 9 23:29:38 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 % symbols: 10
% 0.12/0.34 % clauses: 25
% 0.12/0.34 % start clauses: 1
% 0.12/0.34 % iterative deepening steps: 22
% 0.12/0.34 % maximum path limit: 1
% 0.12/0.34 % literal attempts: 159
% 0.12/0.34 % depth failures: 110
% 0.12/0.34 % regularity failures: 10
% 0.12/0.34 % tautology failures: 4
% 0.12/0.34 % reductions: 0
% 0.12/0.34 % extensions: 145
% 0.12/0.34 % SAT variables: 100
% 0.12/0.34 % SAT clauses: 107
% 0.12/0.34 % WalkSAT solutions: 101
% 0.12/0.34 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.12/0.34 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.34 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------