TSTP Solution File: SET602+3 by Metis---2.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Metis---2.4
% Problem : SET602+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 03:35:49 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.35s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 25 ( 16 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 37 ( 23 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 29 ( 17 ~; 8 |; 1 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 23 ( 0 sgn 16 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(difference_empty_set,axiom,
! [B,C] :
( difference(B,C) = empty_set
<=> subset(B,C) ) ).
fof(reflexivity_of_subset,axiom,
! [B] : subset(B,B) ).
fof(prove_self_difference_is_empty_set,conjecture,
! [B] : difference(B,B) = empty_set ).
fof(subgoal_0,plain,
! [B] : difference(B,B) = empty_set,
inference(strip,[],[prove_self_difference_is_empty_set]) ).
fof(negate_0_0,plain,
~ ! [B] : difference(B,B) = empty_set,
inference(negate,[],[subgoal_0]) ).
fof(normalize_0_0,plain,
? [B] : difference(B,B) != empty_set,
inference(canonicalize,[],[negate_0_0]) ).
fof(normalize_0_1,plain,
difference(skolemFOFtoCNF_B,skolemFOFtoCNF_B) != empty_set,
inference(skolemize,[],[normalize_0_0]) ).
fof(normalize_0_2,plain,
! [B] : subset(B,B),
inference(canonicalize,[],[reflexivity_of_subset]) ).
fof(normalize_0_3,plain,
! [B] : subset(B,B),
inference(specialize,[],[normalize_0_2]) ).
fof(normalize_0_4,plain,
! [B,C] :
( difference(B,C) != empty_set
<=> ~ subset(B,C) ),
inference(canonicalize,[],[difference_empty_set]) ).
fof(normalize_0_5,plain,
! [B,C] :
( difference(B,C) != empty_set
<=> ~ subset(B,C) ),
inference(specialize,[],[normalize_0_4]) ).
fof(normalize_0_6,plain,
! [B,C] :
( ( difference(B,C) != empty_set
| subset(B,C) )
& ( ~ subset(B,C)
| difference(B,C) = empty_set ) ),
inference(clausify,[],[normalize_0_5]) ).
fof(normalize_0_7,plain,
! [B,C] :
( ~ subset(B,C)
| difference(B,C) = empty_set ),
inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_0_6]) ).
cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
difference(skolemFOFtoCNF_B,skolemFOFtoCNF_B) != empty_set,
inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_1]) ).
cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
subset(B,B),
inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_3]) ).
cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
subset(X_8,X_8),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_1:[bind(B,$fot(X_8))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
( ~ subset(B,C)
| difference(B,C) = empty_set ),
inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_7]) ).
cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
( ~ subset(X_8,X_8)
| difference(X_8,X_8) = empty_set ),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_3:[bind(B,$fot(X_8)),bind(C,$fot(X_8))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
difference(X_8,X_8) = empty_set,
inference(resolve,[$cnf( subset(X_8,X_8) )],[refute_0_2,refute_0_4]) ).
cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
difference(skolemFOFtoCNF_B,skolemFOFtoCNF_B) = empty_set,
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_5:[bind(X_8,$fot(skolemFOFtoCNF_B))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
( difference(skolemFOFtoCNF_B,skolemFOFtoCNF_B) != empty_set
| empty_set != empty_set
| difference(skolemFOFtoCNF_B,skolemFOFtoCNF_B) = empty_set ),
introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( ~ $equal(difference(skolemFOFtoCNF_B,skolemFOFtoCNF_B),empty_set) ),[0],$fot(empty_set)]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
( empty_set != empty_set
| difference(skolemFOFtoCNF_B,skolemFOFtoCNF_B) = empty_set ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(difference(skolemFOFtoCNF_B,skolemFOFtoCNF_B),empty_set) )],[refute_0_6,refute_0_7]) ).
cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
empty_set != empty_set,
inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(difference(skolemFOFtoCNF_B,skolemFOFtoCNF_B),empty_set) )],[refute_0_8,refute_0_0]) ).
cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
empty_set = empty_set,
introduced(tautology,[refl,[$fot(empty_set)]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
$false,
inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(empty_set,empty_set) )],[refute_0_10,refute_0_9]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SET602+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jul 9 22:49:17 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.13/0.35 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.35
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------