TSTP Solution File: SET597+3 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SET597+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 01:01:08 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.38s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SET597+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 15:41:52 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.12/0.37 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 0.12/0.37 #
% 0.12/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.37 # Number of axioms: 21 Number of unprocessed: 19
% 0.12/0.37 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.12/0.37 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.12/0.37 # Hello from C++
% 0.12/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.12/0.37 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.12/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.12/0.37 # 19 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.12/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 6 conjectures.
% 0.12/0.37 # There are 6 start rule candidates:
% 0.12/0.37 # Found 3 unit axioms.
% 0.12/0.37 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.12/0.37 # 6 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.12/0.37 # 16 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.12/0.37 # 3 unit axiom clauses
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.12/0.37 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 6
% 0.12/0.37 # Returning from population with 13 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.12/0.37 # We now have 13 tableaux to operate on
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 4 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 4 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 4 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 4 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 4 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 4 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.20/0.38 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.38 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.38 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.20/0.38
% 0.20/0.38 # End clausification derivation
% 0.20/0.38 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (subset(X1,X1))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (subset(X1,union(X1,X2)))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (union(X1,X2)=union(X2,X1))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_20, negated_conjecture, (union(esk4_0,esk5_0)=esk3_0|subset(esk4_0,esk3_0))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_19, negated_conjecture, (union(esk4_0,esk5_0)=esk3_0|subset(esk5_0,esk3_0))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)|subset(X1,X2))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (member(X1,union(X2,X3))|~member(X1,X3))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (member(X1,union(X2,X3))|~member(X1,X2))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_21, negated_conjecture, (union(esk4_0,esk5_0)!=esk3_0|~subset(esk3_0,esk6_0)|~subset(esk4_0,esk3_0)|~subset(esk5_0,esk3_0))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_23, negated_conjecture, (subset(esk4_0,esk6_0)|union(esk4_0,esk5_0)!=esk3_0|~subset(esk4_0,esk3_0)|~subset(esk5_0,esk3_0))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (subset(esk5_0,esk6_0)|union(esk4_0,esk5_0)!=esk3_0|~subset(esk4_0,esk3_0)|~subset(esk5_0,esk3_0))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (union(esk4_0,esk5_0)=esk3_0|subset(esk3_0,X1)|~subset(esk4_0,X1)|~subset(esk5_0,X1))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (subset(union(X1,X2),X3)|~subset(X2,X3)|~subset(X1,X3))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (X1=X2|~subset(X2,X1)|~subset(X1,X2))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (member(X1,X2)|~member(X1,X3)|~subset(X3,X2))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (X1=X2|member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X1)|member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (subset(X1,X2)|~member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (member(X1,X2)|member(X1,X3)|~member(X1,union(X2,X3)))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (X1=X2|~member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2)|~member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X1))).
% 0.20/0.38 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.20/0.38 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.20/0.38 # Found 9 steps
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (subset(esk5_0,esk6_0)|union(esk4_0,esk5_0)!=esk3_0|~subset(esk4_0,esk3_0)|~subset(esk5_0,esk3_0)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (subset(esk5_0,esk6_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_2])).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_146, plain, (~subset(esk6_0,esk6_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_13])).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_144, plain, (subset(union(esk6_0,esk5_0),esk6_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_155, plain, (~subset(esk6_0,union(esk6_0,esk5_0))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_1])).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (union(esk4_0,esk5_0)!=esk3_0), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_31, ...])).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (~subset(esk4_0,esk3_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_32, ...])).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (~subset(esk5_0,esk3_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_33, ...])).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_153, plain, (union(esk6_0,esk5_0)=esk6_0), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_153, ...])).
% 0.20/0.38 # End printing tableau
% 0.20/0.38 # SZS output end
% 0.20/0.38 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.20/0.38 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.38 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.38 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.20/0.38
% 0.20/0.38 # End clausification derivation
% 0.20/0.38 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (subset(X1,X1))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (subset(X1,union(X1,X2)))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (union(X1,X2)=union(X2,X1))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_20, negated_conjecture, (union(esk4_0,esk5_0)=esk3_0|subset(esk4_0,esk3_0))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_19, negated_conjecture, (union(esk4_0,esk5_0)=esk3_0|subset(esk5_0,esk3_0))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)|subset(X1,X2))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (member(X1,union(X2,X3))|~member(X1,X3))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (member(X1,union(X2,X3))|~member(X1,X2))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_21, negated_conjecture, (union(esk4_0,esk5_0)!=esk3_0|~subset(esk3_0,esk6_0)|~subset(esk4_0,esk3_0)|~subset(esk5_0,esk3_0))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_23, negated_conjecture, (subset(esk4_0,esk6_0)|union(esk4_0,esk5_0)!=esk3_0|~subset(esk4_0,esk3_0)|~subset(esk5_0,esk3_0))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (subset(esk5_0,esk6_0)|union(esk4_0,esk5_0)!=esk3_0|~subset(esk4_0,esk3_0)|~subset(esk5_0,esk3_0))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (union(esk4_0,esk5_0)=esk3_0|subset(esk3_0,X1)|~subset(esk4_0,X1)|~subset(esk5_0,X1))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (subset(union(X1,X2),X3)|~subset(X2,X3)|~subset(X1,X3))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (X1=X2|~subset(X2,X1)|~subset(X1,X2))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (member(X1,X2)|~member(X1,X3)|~subset(X3,X2))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (X1=X2|member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X1)|member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (subset(X1,X2)|~member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (member(X1,X2)|member(X1,X3)|~member(X1,union(X2,X3)))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (X1=X2|~member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2)|~member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X1))).
% 0.20/0.38 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.20/0.38 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.20/0.38 # Found 9 steps
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_23, negated_conjecture, (subset(esk4_0,esk6_0)|union(esk4_0,esk5_0)!=esk3_0|~subset(esk4_0,esk3_0)|~subset(esk5_0,esk3_0)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (subset(esk4_0,esk6_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_2])).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_146, plain, (~subset(esk6_0,esk6_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_13])).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_144, plain, (subset(union(esk6_0,esk4_0),esk6_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_155, plain, (~subset(esk6_0,union(esk6_0,esk4_0))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_1])).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (union(esk4_0,esk5_0)!=esk3_0), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_35, ...])).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (~subset(esk4_0,esk3_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_36, ...])).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (~subset(esk5_0,esk3_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_37, ...])).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_153, plain, (union(esk6_0,esk4_0)=esk6_0), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_153, ...])).
% 0.20/0.38 # End printing tableau
% 0.20/0.38 # SZS output end
% 0.20/0.38 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.20/0.38 # Child (29598) has found a proof.
% 0.20/0.38
% 0.20/0.38 # Proof search is over...
% 0.20/0.38 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------