TSTP Solution File: SET596+3 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : SET596+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 09:19:08 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.16s 0.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   59 (  19 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   53 (  22   ~;  16   |;   9   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   45 (   2 sgn  31   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_th55,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( subset(X1,X2)
        & intersection(X2,X3) = empty_set )
     => intersection(X1,X3) = empty_set ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9r2KOXMlv1/E---3.1_12763.p',prove_th55) ).

fof(empty_set_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1] : ~ member(X1,empty_set),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9r2KOXMlv1/E---3.1_12763.p',empty_set_defn) ).

fof(intersection_of_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
     => subset(intersection(X1,X3),intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9r2KOXMlv1/E---3.1_12763.p',intersection_of_subset) ).

fof(subset_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
         => member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9r2KOXMlv1/E---3.1_12763.p',subset_defn) ).

fof(equal_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X1 = X2
    <=> ( subset(X1,X2)
        & subset(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9r2KOXMlv1/E---3.1_12763.p',equal_defn) ).

fof(commutativity_of_intersection,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : intersection(X1,X2) = intersection(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9r2KOXMlv1/E---3.1_12763.p',commutativity_of_intersection) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( subset(X1,X2)
          & intersection(X2,X3) = empty_set )
       => intersection(X1,X3) = empty_set ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_th55]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X1] : ~ member(X1,empty_set),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[empty_set_defn]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X9,X10,X11] :
      ( ~ subset(X9,X10)
      | subset(intersection(X9,X11),intersection(X10,X11)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[intersection_of_subset])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & intersection(esk2_0,esk3_0) = empty_set
    & intersection(esk1_0,esk3_0) != empty_set ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X8] : ~ member(X8,empty_set),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X17,X18,X19,X20,X21] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X17,X18)
        | ~ member(X19,X17)
        | member(X19,X18) )
      & ( member(esk4_2(X20,X21),X20)
        | subset(X20,X21) )
      & ( ~ member(esk4_2(X20,X21),X21)
        | subset(X20,X21) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset_defn])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X23,X24] :
      ( ( subset(X23,X24)
        | X23 != X24 )
      & ( subset(X24,X23)
        | X23 != X24 )
      & ( ~ subset(X23,X24)
        | ~ subset(X24,X23)
        | X23 = X24 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[equal_defn])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( subset(intersection(X1,X3),intersection(X2,X3))
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    intersection(esk2_0,esk3_0) = empty_set,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ~ member(X1,empty_set),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( member(esk4_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X15,X16] : intersection(X15,X16) = intersection(X16,X15),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_intersection]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(intersection(X1,esk3_0),empty_set)
    | ~ subset(X1,esk2_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    subset(empty_set,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    intersection(esk1_0,esk3_0) != empty_set,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    intersection(X1,X2) = intersection(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( intersection(X1,esk3_0) = empty_set
    | ~ subset(X1,esk2_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    intersection(esk3_0,esk1_0) != empty_set,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( intersection(esk3_0,X1) = empty_set
    | ~ subset(X1,esk2_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem    : SET596+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 10:32:46 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9r2KOXMlv1/E---3.1_12763.p
% 0.16/0.43  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.16/0.43  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.43  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.43  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.43  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43  # sh5l with pid 12844 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.43  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.16/0.43  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.43  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.43  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.43  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.16/0.43  # Search class: FGHSS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.43  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.43  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 12847 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.43  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.16/0.43  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.43  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.43  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.43  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.16/0.43  # Search class: FGHSS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.43  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.43  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.43  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.43  
% 0.16/0.43  # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.43  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.16/0.43  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.43  # Parsed axioms                        : 11
% 0.16/0.43  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.16/0.43  # Initial clauses                      : 23
% 0.16/0.43  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.16/0.43  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 21
% 0.16/0.43  # Processed clauses                    : 60
% 0.16/0.43  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.16/0.43  # ...subsumed                          : 6
% 0.16/0.43  # ...remaining for further processing  : 53
% 0.16/0.43  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 0.16/0.43  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.16/0.43  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.16/0.43  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.16/0.43  # Generated clauses                    : 68
% 0.16/0.43  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 55
% 0.16/0.43  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.16/0.43  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.16/0.43  # Paramodulations                      : 66
% 0.16/0.43  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.16/0.43  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.16/0.43  # Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 0.16/0.43  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.16/0.43  # Total rewrite steps                  : 14
% 0.16/0.43  # ...of those cached                   : 4
% 0.16/0.43  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.16/0.43  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.16/0.43  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.43  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.16/0.43  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.43  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.16/0.43  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43  # Current number of processed clauses  : 31
% 0.16/0.43  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
% 0.16/0.43  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.16/0.43  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.16/0.43  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 23
% 0.16/0.43  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 29
% 0.16/0.43  # ...number of literals in the above   : 71
% 0.16/0.43  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.16/0.43  # Current number of archived clauses   : 20
% 0.16/0.43  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 46
% 0.16/0.43  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 40
% 0.16/0.43  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 3
% 0.16/0.43  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.16/0.43  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.16/0.43  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 14
% 0.16/0.43  # BW rewrite match successes           : 10
% 0.16/0.43  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.16/0.43  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.16/0.43  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1918
% 0.16/0.43  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 360
% 0.16/0.43  
% 0.16/0.43  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.43  # User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.16/0.43  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.16/0.43  # Total time               : 0.008 s
% 0.16/0.43  # Maximum resident set size: 1700 pages
% 0.16/0.43  
% 0.16/0.43  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.43  # User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.16/0.43  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.43  # Total time               : 0.010 s
% 0.16/0.43  # Maximum resident set size: 1696 pages
% 0.16/0.43  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.16/0.44  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------