TSTP Solution File: SET595+3 by Leo-III---1.7.7
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.7.7
% Problem : SET595+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_Leo-III %s %d
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:53:40 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 3.29s 1.75s
% Output : Refutation 3.44s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 5 unt; 4 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 68 ( 13 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 193 ( 5 ~; 3 |; 14 &; 140 @)
% ( 7 <=>; 24 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 7 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 8 ( 8 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 48 ( 0 ^; 48 !; 0 ?; 48 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(subset_type,type,
subset: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(union_type,type,
union: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(difference_type,type,
difference: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(member_type,type,
member: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(8,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( union @ A @ B )
= ( union @ B @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_union) ).
thf(56,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( union @ A @ B )
= ( union @ B @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( member @ C @ ( union @ A @ B ) )
<=> ( ( member @ C @ A )
| ( member @ C @ B ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',union_defn) ).
thf(25,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( member @ C @ ( union @ A @ B ) )
=> ( ( member @ C @ A )
| ( member @ C @ B ) ) )
& ( ( ( member @ C @ A )
| ( member @ C @ B ) )
=> ( member @ C @ ( union @ A @ B ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(6,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( subset @ A @ B )
<=> ! [C: $i] :
( ( member @ C @ A )
=> ( member @ C @ B ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subset_defn) ).
thf(38,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( subset @ A @ B )
=> ! [C: $i] :
( ( member @ C @ A )
=> ( member @ C @ B ) ) )
& ( ! [C: $i] :
( ( member @ C @ A )
=> ( member @ C @ B ) )
=> ( subset @ A @ B ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(9,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( A = B )
<=> ! [C: $i] :
( ( member @ C @ A )
<=> ( member @ C @ B ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equal_member_defn) ).
thf(59,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( A = B )
=> ! [C: $i] :
( ( ( member @ C @ A )
=> ( member @ C @ B ) )
& ( ( member @ C @ B )
=> ( member @ C @ A ) ) ) )
& ( ! [C: $i] :
( ( ( member @ C @ A )
=> ( member @ C @ B ) )
& ( ( member @ C @ B )
=> ( member @ C @ A ) ) )
=> ( A = B ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(1,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( subset @ A @ B )
=> ( B
= ( union @ A @ ( difference @ B @ A ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_th54) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( subset @ A @ B )
=> ( B
= ( union @ A @ ( difference @ B @ A ) ) ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(11,plain,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( subset @ A @ B )
=> ( B
= ( union @ A @ ( difference @ B @ A ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(10,axiom,
! [A: $i] : ( subset @ A @ A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_of_subset) ).
thf(79,plain,
! [A: $i] : ( subset @ A @ A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ! [C: $i] :
( ( member @ C @ A )
<=> ( member @ C @ B ) )
=> ( A = B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',member_equal) ).
thf(15,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ! [C: $i] :
( ( ( member @ C @ A )
=> ( member @ C @ B ) )
& ( ( member @ C @ B )
=> ( member @ C @ A ) ) )
=> ( A = B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(5,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( member @ C @ ( difference @ A @ B ) )
<=> ( ( member @ C @ A )
& ~ ( member @ C @ B ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',difference_defn) ).
thf(32,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( member @ C @ ( difference @ A @ B ) )
=> ( ( member @ C @ A )
& ~ ( member @ C @ B ) ) )
& ( ( ( member @ C @ A )
& ~ ( member @ C @ B ) )
=> ( member @ C @ ( difference @ A @ B ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(7,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( A = B )
<=> ( ( subset @ A @ B )
& ( subset @ B @ A ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equal_defn) ).
thf(45,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( A = B )
=> ( ( subset @ A @ B )
& ( subset @ B @ A ) ) )
& ( ( ( subset @ A @ B )
& ( subset @ B @ A ) )
=> ( A = B ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(81,plain,
$false,
inference(cvc4,[status(thm)],[56,25,38,59,11,79,15,32,45]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : SET595+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.06/0.14 % Command : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Thu May 18 19:00:48 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.92/0.83 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.21/0.95 % [INFO] Parsing done (115ms).
% 1.21/0.96 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 1.62/1.16 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 1.62/1.16 % [INFO] cvc4 registered as external prover.
% 1.62/1.16 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 1.70/1.22 % [INFO] Found a conjecture and 8 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 1.87/1.24 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 8 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 1.87/1.25 % [INFO] Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF).
% 1.87/1.26 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 1.98/1.26 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 3.09/1.75 % External prover 'cvc4' found a proof!
% 3.09/1.75 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 3.09/1.75 % Time passed: 1239ms (effective reasoning time: 791ms)
% 3.09/1.75 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.29/1.75 % Axioms used in derivation (8): reflexivity_of_subset, equal_member_defn, member_equal, equal_defn, difference_defn, commutativity_of_union, union_defn, subset_defn
% 3.29/1.75 % No. of inferences in proof: 20
% 3.29/1.75 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1239 ms resp. 791 ms w/o parsing
% 3.44/1.82 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.44/1.82 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------