TSTP Solution File: SET594+3 by ePrincess---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : SET594+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:20:33 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 3.35s 1.56s
% Output   : Proof 5.33s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SET594+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jul  9 21:14:12 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.55/0.58          ____       _                          
% 0.55/0.58    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.55/0.58   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.55/0.58  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.55/0.58  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.55/0.58  
% 0.55/0.58  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.55/0.58  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.55/0.58  
% 0.55/0.58  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.55/0.58  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.55/0.58  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.55/0.58  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.55/0.58  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.55/0.58  
% 0.55/0.58  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.55/0.58  
% 0.55/0.58  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.74/0.63  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.42/0.92  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 1.85/1.12  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 1.85/1.14  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.64/1.34  Prover 0: gave up
% 2.64/1.34  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 2.64/1.36  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.92/1.44  Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 2.92/1.45  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.35/1.56  Prover 1: proved (214ms)
% 3.35/1.56  
% 3.35/1.56  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 3.35/1.56  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 3.35/1.56  
% 3.35/1.56  Generating proof ... Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 5.33/2.00  found it (size 71)
% 5.33/2.00  
% 5.33/2.00  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 5.33/2.00  Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: 
% 5.33/2.00  | (0)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) & intersection(v0, v2) = v4 & intersection(v0, v1) = v3 & union(v3, v4) = v0 & union(v1, v2) = v5 & subset(v0, v5) = v6 &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v11 = 0 |  ~ (intersection(v7, v8) = v10) |  ~ (member(v9, v10) = v11) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : (member(v9, v8) = v13 & member(v9, v7) = v12 & ( ~ (v13 = 0) |  ~ (v12 = 0)))) &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v11 = 0 |  ~ (union(v7, v8) = v10) |  ~ (member(v9, v10) = v11) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) &  ~ (v12 = 0) & member(v9, v8) = v13 & member(v9, v7) = v12)) &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v8 = v7 |  ~ (intersection(v10, v9) = v8) |  ~ (intersection(v10, v9) = v7)) &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v8 = v7 |  ~ (union(v10, v9) = v8) |  ~ (union(v10, v9) = v7)) &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v8 = v7 |  ~ (subset(v10, v9) = v8) |  ~ (subset(v10, v9) = v7)) &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v8 = v7 |  ~ (member(v10, v9) = v8) |  ~ (member(v10, v9) = v7)) &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : ( ~ (intersection(v7, v8) = v10) |  ~ (member(v9, v10) = 0) | (member(v9, v8) = 0 & member(v9, v7) = 0)) &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : ( ~ (union(v7, v8) = v10) |  ~ (member(v9, v10) = 0) |  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : (member(v9, v8) = v12 & member(v9, v7) = v11 & (v12 = 0 | v11 = 0))) &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v9 = 0 |  ~ (subset(v7, v8) = v9) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : ( ~ (v11 = 0) & member(v10, v8) = v11 & member(v10, v7) = 0)) &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (intersection(v7, v8) = v9) | intersection(v8, v7) = v9) &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (union(v7, v8) = v9) | union(v8, v7) = v9) &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (subset(v7, v8) = 0) |  ~ (member(v9, v7) = 0) | member(v9, v8) = 0) &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v8 = v7 |  ~ (subset(v7, v8) = 0) |  ? [v9] : ( ~ (v9 = 0) & subset(v8, v7) = v9)) &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v8 = 0 |  ~ (subset(v7, v7) = v8)) &  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (v8 = v7 |  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : (member(v9, v8) = v11 & member(v9, v7) = v10 & ( ~ (v11 = 0) |  ~ (v10 = 0)) & (v11 = 0 | v10 = 0))))
% 5.33/2.04  | Instantiating (0) with all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6 yields:
% 5.33/2.04  | (1)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0) & intersection(all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2 & intersection(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_0_3_3 & union(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_6_6 & union(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1 & subset(all_0_6_6, all_0_1_1) = all_0_0_0 &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (intersection(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (member(v2, v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (member(v2, v1) = v6 & member(v2, v0) = v5 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (union(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (member(v2, v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v5 = 0) & member(v2, v1) = v6 & member(v2, v0) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (union(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (union(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (subset(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (subset(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (member(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (member(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (intersection(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (member(v2, v3) = 0) | (member(v2, v1) = 0 & member(v2, v0) = 0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (union(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (member(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : (member(v2, v1) = v5 & member(v2, v0) = v4 & (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (subset(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & member(v3, v1) = v4 & member(v3, v0) = 0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection(v0, v1) = v2) | intersection(v1, v0) = v2) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (union(v0, v1) = v2) | union(v1, v0) = v2) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (subset(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (member(v2, v0) = 0) | member(v2, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (subset(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & subset(v1, v0) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (subset(v0, v0) = v1)) &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (v1 = v0 |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (member(v2, v1) = v4 & member(v2, v0) = v3 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)) & (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0)))
% 5.33/2.04  |
% 5.33/2.04  | Applying alpha-rule on (1) yields:
% 5.33/2.04  | (2)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (member(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (member(v3, v2) = v0))
% 5.33/2.04  | (3)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (union(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (member(v2, v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v5 = 0) & member(v2, v1) = v6 & member(v2, v0) = v5))
% 5.33/2.04  | (4)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (union(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (union(v3, v2) = v0))
% 5.33/2.04  | (5) intersection(all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2
% 5.33/2.04  | (6) subset(all_0_6_6, all_0_1_1) = all_0_0_0
% 5.33/2.05  | (7)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (subset(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (member(v2, v0) = 0) | member(v2, v1) = 0)
% 5.33/2.05  | (8) intersection(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_0_3_3
% 5.33/2.05  | (9)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (subset(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & subset(v1, v0) = v2))
% 5.33/2.05  | (10)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (subset(v0, v0) = v1))
% 5.33/2.05  | (11)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (subset(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & member(v3, v1) = v4 & member(v3, v0) = 0))
% 5.33/2.05  | (12)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection(v0, v1) = v2) | intersection(v1, v0) = v2)
% 5.33/2.05  | (13) union(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_6_6
% 5.33/2.05  | (14)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (subset(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (subset(v3, v2) = v0))
% 5.33/2.05  | (15) union(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1
% 5.33/2.05  | (16)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (union(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (member(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : (member(v2, v1) = v5 & member(v2, v0) = v4 & (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0)))
% 5.33/2.05  | (17)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (intersection(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (member(v2, v3) = 0) | (member(v2, v1) = 0 & member(v2, v0) = 0))
% 5.33/2.05  | (18)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection(v3, v2) = v0))
% 5.33/2.05  | (19)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 5.33/2.05  | (20)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (union(v0, v1) = v2) | union(v1, v0) = v2)
% 5.33/2.05  | (21)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (intersection(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (member(v2, v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (member(v2, v1) = v6 & member(v2, v0) = v5 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0))))
% 5.33/2.05  | (22)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (v1 = v0 |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (member(v2, v1) = v4 & member(v2, v0) = v3 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)) & (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0)))
% 5.33/2.05  |
% 5.33/2.05  | Instantiating formula (20) with all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms union(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_6_6, yields:
% 5.33/2.05  | (23) union(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_0_6_6
% 5.33/2.05  |
% 5.33/2.05  | Instantiating formula (20) with all_0_1_1, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms union(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 5.33/2.05  | (24) union(all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5) = all_0_1_1
% 5.33/2.05  |
% 5.33/2.05  | Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms subset(all_0_6_6, all_0_1_1) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 5.33/2.05  | (25) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & member(v0, all_0_1_1) = v1 & member(v0, all_0_6_6) = 0)
% 5.33/2.05  |
% 5.33/2.05  +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (25), into two cases.
% 5.33/2.05  |-Branch one:
% 5.33/2.05  | (26) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 5.33/2.05  |
% 5.33/2.05  	| Equations (26) can reduce 19 to:
% 5.33/2.05  	| (27) $false
% 5.33/2.05  	|
% 5.33/2.05  	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 5.33/2.05  |-Branch two:
% 5.33/2.05  | (19)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 5.33/2.05  | (29)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & member(v0, all_0_1_1) = v1 & member(v0, all_0_6_6) = 0)
% 5.33/2.05  |
% 5.33/2.05  	| Instantiating (29) with all_18_0_9, all_18_1_10 yields:
% 5.33/2.05  	| (30)  ~ (all_18_0_9 = 0) & member(all_18_1_10, all_0_1_1) = all_18_0_9 & member(all_18_1_10, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 5.33/2.05  	|
% 5.33/2.05  	| Applying alpha-rule on (30) yields:
% 5.33/2.05  	| (31)  ~ (all_18_0_9 = 0)
% 5.33/2.05  	| (32) member(all_18_1_10, all_0_1_1) = all_18_0_9
% 5.33/2.05  	| (33) member(all_18_1_10, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 5.33/2.05  	|
% 5.33/2.05  	| Instantiating formula (3) with all_18_0_9, all_0_1_1, all_18_1_10, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms union(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1, member(all_18_1_10, all_0_1_1) = all_18_0_9, yields:
% 5.33/2.05  	| (34) all_18_0_9 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (v0 = 0) & member(all_18_1_10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & member(all_18_1_10, all_0_5_5) = v0)
% 5.33/2.06  	|
% 5.33/2.06  	| Instantiating formula (3) with all_18_0_9, all_0_1_1, all_18_1_10, all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms union(all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5) = all_0_1_1, member(all_18_1_10, all_0_1_1) = all_18_0_9, yields:
% 5.33/2.06  	| (35) all_18_0_9 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (v0 = 0) & member(all_18_1_10, all_0_4_4) = v0 & member(all_18_1_10, all_0_5_5) = v1)
% 5.33/2.06  	|
% 5.33/2.06  	| Instantiating formula (17) with all_0_6_6, all_18_1_10, all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms member(all_18_1_10, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 5.33/2.06  	| (36)  ~ (intersection(all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4) = all_0_6_6) | member(all_18_1_10, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 5.33/2.06  	|
% 5.33/2.06  	| Instantiating formula (17) with all_0_6_6, all_18_1_10, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms member(all_18_1_10, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 5.33/2.06  	| (37)  ~ (intersection(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_0_6_6) | member(all_18_1_10, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 5.33/2.06  	|
% 5.33/2.06  	| Instantiating formula (17) with all_0_6_6, all_18_1_10, all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms member(all_18_1_10, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 5.33/2.06  	| (38)  ~ (intersection(all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6) = all_0_6_6) | member(all_18_1_10, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 5.33/2.06  	|
% 5.33/2.06  	| Instantiating formula (17) with all_0_6_6, all_18_1_10, all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms member(all_18_1_10, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 5.33/2.06  	| (39)  ~ (intersection(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = all_0_6_6) | member(all_18_1_10, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 5.33/2.06  	|
% 5.33/2.06  	| Instantiating formula (16) with all_0_6_6, all_18_1_10, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms union(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_6_6, member(all_18_1_10, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 5.33/2.06  	| (40)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (member(all_18_1_10, all_0_2_2) = v1 & member(all_18_1_10, all_0_3_3) = v0 & (v1 = 0 | v0 = 0))
% 5.33/2.06  	|
% 5.33/2.06  	| Instantiating formula (16) with all_0_6_6, all_18_1_10, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms union(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_0_6_6, member(all_18_1_10, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 5.33/2.06  	| (41)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (member(all_18_1_10, all_0_2_2) = v0 & member(all_18_1_10, all_0_3_3) = v1 & (v1 = 0 | v0 = 0))
% 5.33/2.06  	|
% 5.33/2.06  	| Instantiating (41) with all_29_0_11, all_29_1_12 yields:
% 5.33/2.06  	| (42) member(all_18_1_10, all_0_2_2) = all_29_1_12 & member(all_18_1_10, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_11 & (all_29_0_11 = 0 | all_29_1_12 = 0)
% 5.33/2.06  	|
% 5.33/2.06  	| Applying alpha-rule on (42) yields:
% 5.33/2.06  	| (43) member(all_18_1_10, all_0_2_2) = all_29_1_12
% 5.33/2.06  	| (44) member(all_18_1_10, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_11
% 5.33/2.06  	| (45) all_29_0_11 = 0 | all_29_1_12 = 0
% 5.33/2.06  	|
% 5.33/2.06  	| Instantiating (40) with all_31_0_13, all_31_1_14 yields:
% 5.33/2.06  	| (46) member(all_18_1_10, all_0_2_2) = all_31_0_13 & member(all_18_1_10, all_0_3_3) = all_31_1_14 & (all_31_0_13 = 0 | all_31_1_14 = 0)
% 5.33/2.06  	|
% 5.33/2.06  	| Applying alpha-rule on (46) yields:
% 5.33/2.06  	| (47) member(all_18_1_10, all_0_2_2) = all_31_0_13
% 5.33/2.06  	| (48) member(all_18_1_10, all_0_3_3) = all_31_1_14
% 5.33/2.06  	| (49) all_31_0_13 = 0 | all_31_1_14 = 0
% 5.33/2.06  	|
% 5.33/2.06  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (34), into two cases.
% 5.33/2.06  	|-Branch one:
% 5.33/2.06  	| (50) all_18_0_9 = 0
% 5.33/2.06  	|
% 5.33/2.06  		| Equations (50) can reduce 31 to:
% 5.33/2.06  		| (27) $false
% 5.33/2.06  		|
% 5.33/2.06  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 5.33/2.06  	|-Branch two:
% 5.33/2.06  	| (31)  ~ (all_18_0_9 = 0)
% 5.33/2.06  	| (53)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (v0 = 0) & member(all_18_1_10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & member(all_18_1_10, all_0_5_5) = v0)
% 5.33/2.06  	|
% 5.33/2.06  		| Instantiating (53) with all_37_0_15, all_37_1_16 yields:
% 5.33/2.06  		| (54)  ~ (all_37_0_15 = 0) &  ~ (all_37_1_16 = 0) & member(all_18_1_10, all_0_4_4) = all_37_0_15 & member(all_18_1_10, all_0_5_5) = all_37_1_16
% 5.33/2.06  		|
% 5.33/2.06  		| Applying alpha-rule on (54) yields:
% 5.33/2.06  		| (55)  ~ (all_37_0_15 = 0)
% 5.33/2.06  		| (56)  ~ (all_37_1_16 = 0)
% 5.33/2.06  		| (57) member(all_18_1_10, all_0_4_4) = all_37_0_15
% 5.33/2.06  		| (58) member(all_18_1_10, all_0_5_5) = all_37_1_16
% 5.33/2.06  		|
% 5.33/2.06  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (35), into two cases.
% 5.33/2.06  		|-Branch one:
% 5.33/2.06  		| (50) all_18_0_9 = 0
% 5.33/2.06  		|
% 5.33/2.06  			| Equations (50) can reduce 31 to:
% 5.33/2.06  			| (27) $false
% 5.33/2.06  			|
% 5.33/2.06  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 5.33/2.06  		|-Branch two:
% 5.33/2.06  		| (31)  ~ (all_18_0_9 = 0)
% 5.33/2.06  		| (62)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (v0 = 0) & member(all_18_1_10, all_0_4_4) = v0 & member(all_18_1_10, all_0_5_5) = v1)
% 5.33/2.06  		|
% 5.33/2.06  			| Instantiating (62) with all_42_0_17, all_42_1_18 yields:
% 5.33/2.06  			| (63)  ~ (all_42_0_17 = 0) &  ~ (all_42_1_18 = 0) & member(all_18_1_10, all_0_4_4) = all_42_1_18 & member(all_18_1_10, all_0_5_5) = all_42_0_17
% 5.33/2.06  			|
% 5.33/2.06  			| Applying alpha-rule on (63) yields:
% 5.33/2.06  			| (64)  ~ (all_42_0_17 = 0)
% 5.33/2.06  			| (65)  ~ (all_42_1_18 = 0)
% 5.33/2.06  			| (66) member(all_18_1_10, all_0_4_4) = all_42_1_18
% 5.33/2.06  			| (67) member(all_18_1_10, all_0_5_5) = all_42_0_17
% 5.33/2.06  			|
% 5.33/2.06  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (37), into two cases.
% 5.33/2.06  			|-Branch one:
% 5.33/2.06  			| (68) member(all_18_1_10, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 5.33/2.06  			|
% 5.33/2.06  				| Instantiating formula (2) with all_18_1_10, all_0_5_5, all_42_0_17, 0 and discharging atoms member(all_18_1_10, all_0_5_5) = all_42_0_17, member(all_18_1_10, all_0_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 5.33/2.06  				| (69) all_42_0_17 = 0
% 5.33/2.06  				|
% 5.33/2.06  				| Instantiating formula (2) with all_18_1_10, all_0_5_5, all_37_1_16, all_42_0_17 and discharging atoms member(all_18_1_10, all_0_5_5) = all_42_0_17, member(all_18_1_10, all_0_5_5) = all_37_1_16, yields:
% 5.33/2.06  				| (70) all_42_0_17 = all_37_1_16
% 5.33/2.06  				|
% 5.33/2.06  				| Combining equations (69,70) yields a new equation:
% 5.33/2.06  				| (71) all_37_1_16 = 0
% 5.33/2.06  				|
% 5.33/2.07  				| Equations (71) can reduce 56 to:
% 5.33/2.07  				| (27) $false
% 5.33/2.07  				|
% 5.33/2.07  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 5.33/2.07  			|-Branch two:
% 5.33/2.07  			| (73)  ~ (member(all_18_1_10, all_0_5_5) = 0)
% 5.33/2.07  			| (74)  ~ (intersection(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_0_6_6)
% 5.33/2.07  			|
% 5.33/2.07  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (38), into two cases.
% 5.33/2.07  				|-Branch one:
% 5.33/2.07  				| (75) member(all_18_1_10, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 5.33/2.07  				|
% 5.33/2.07  					| Instantiating formula (2) with all_18_1_10, all_0_4_4, all_37_0_15, all_42_1_18 and discharging atoms member(all_18_1_10, all_0_4_4) = all_42_1_18, member(all_18_1_10, all_0_4_4) = all_37_0_15, yields:
% 5.33/2.07  					| (76) all_42_1_18 = all_37_0_15
% 5.33/2.07  					|
% 5.33/2.07  					| Instantiating formula (2) with all_18_1_10, all_0_4_4, 0, all_42_1_18 and discharging atoms member(all_18_1_10, all_0_4_4) = all_42_1_18, member(all_18_1_10, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 5.33/2.07  					| (77) all_42_1_18 = 0
% 5.33/2.07  					|
% 5.33/2.07  					| Combining equations (77,76) yields a new equation:
% 5.33/2.07  					| (78) all_37_0_15 = 0
% 5.33/2.07  					|
% 5.33/2.07  					| Equations (78) can reduce 55 to:
% 5.33/2.07  					| (27) $false
% 5.33/2.07  					|
% 5.33/2.07  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 5.33/2.07  				|-Branch two:
% 5.33/2.07  				| (80)  ~ (member(all_18_1_10, all_0_4_4) = 0)
% 5.33/2.07  				| (81)  ~ (intersection(all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6) = all_0_6_6)
% 5.33/2.07  				|
% 5.33/2.07  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (39), into two cases.
% 5.33/2.07  					|-Branch one:
% 5.33/2.07  					| (68) member(all_18_1_10, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 5.33/2.07  					|
% 5.33/2.07  						| Using (68) and (73) yields:
% 5.33/2.07  						| (83) $false
% 5.33/2.07  						|
% 5.33/2.07  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 5.33/2.07  					|-Branch two:
% 5.33/2.07  					| (73)  ~ (member(all_18_1_10, all_0_5_5) = 0)
% 5.33/2.07  					| (85)  ~ (intersection(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = all_0_6_6)
% 5.33/2.07  					|
% 5.33/2.07  						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (36), into two cases.
% 5.33/2.07  						|-Branch one:
% 5.33/2.07  						| (75) member(all_18_1_10, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 5.33/2.07  						|
% 5.33/2.07  							| Using (75) and (80) yields:
% 5.33/2.07  							| (83) $false
% 5.33/2.07  							|
% 5.33/2.07  							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 5.33/2.07  						|-Branch two:
% 5.33/2.07  						| (80)  ~ (member(all_18_1_10, all_0_4_4) = 0)
% 5.33/2.07  						| (89)  ~ (intersection(all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4) = all_0_6_6)
% 5.33/2.07  						|
% 5.33/2.07  							| Instantiating formula (2) with all_18_1_10, all_0_2_2, all_29_1_12, all_31_0_13 and discharging atoms member(all_18_1_10, all_0_2_2) = all_31_0_13, member(all_18_1_10, all_0_2_2) = all_29_1_12, yields:
% 5.33/2.07  							| (90) all_31_0_13 = all_29_1_12
% 5.33/2.07  							|
% 5.33/2.07  							| Instantiating formula (2) with all_18_1_10, all_0_3_3, all_29_0_11, all_31_1_14 and discharging atoms member(all_18_1_10, all_0_3_3) = all_31_1_14, member(all_18_1_10, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_11, yields:
% 5.33/2.07  							| (91) all_31_1_14 = all_29_0_11
% 5.33/2.07  							|
% 5.33/2.07  							| From (90) and (47) follows:
% 5.33/2.07  							| (43) member(all_18_1_10, all_0_2_2) = all_29_1_12
% 5.33/2.07  							|
% 5.33/2.07  							| From (91) and (48) follows:
% 5.33/2.07  							| (44) member(all_18_1_10, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_11
% 5.33/2.07  							|
% 5.33/2.07  							| Instantiating formula (17) with all_0_2_2, all_18_1_10, all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms intersection(all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 5.33/2.07  							| (94)  ~ (member(all_18_1_10, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (member(all_18_1_10, all_0_4_4) = 0 & member(all_18_1_10, all_0_6_6) = 0)
% 5.33/2.07  							|
% 5.33/2.07  							| Instantiating formula (17) with all_0_3_3, all_18_1_10, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms intersection(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 5.33/2.07  							| (95)  ~ (member(all_18_1_10, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (member(all_18_1_10, all_0_5_5) = 0 & member(all_18_1_10, all_0_6_6) = 0)
% 5.33/2.07  							|
% 5.33/2.07  							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (95), into two cases.
% 5.33/2.07  							|-Branch one:
% 5.33/2.07  							| (96)  ~ (member(all_18_1_10, all_0_3_3) = 0)
% 5.33/2.07  							|
% 5.33/2.07  								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (94), into two cases.
% 5.33/2.07  								|-Branch one:
% 5.33/2.07  								| (97)  ~ (member(all_18_1_10, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 5.33/2.07  								|
% 5.33/2.07  									| Using (43) and (97) yields:
% 5.33/2.07  									| (98)  ~ (all_29_1_12 = 0)
% 5.33/2.07  									|
% 5.33/2.07  									| Using (44) and (96) yields:
% 5.33/2.07  									| (99)  ~ (all_29_0_11 = 0)
% 5.33/2.07  									|
% 5.33/2.07  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (45), into two cases.
% 5.33/2.07  									|-Branch one:
% 5.33/2.07  									| (100) all_29_0_11 = 0
% 5.33/2.07  									|
% 5.33/2.07  										| Equations (100) can reduce 99 to:
% 5.33/2.07  										| (27) $false
% 5.33/2.07  										|
% 5.33/2.07  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 5.33/2.07  									|-Branch two:
% 5.33/2.07  									| (99)  ~ (all_29_0_11 = 0)
% 5.33/2.07  									| (103) all_29_1_12 = 0
% 5.33/2.07  									|
% 5.33/2.07  										| Equations (103) can reduce 98 to:
% 5.33/2.07  										| (27) $false
% 5.33/2.07  										|
% 5.33/2.07  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 5.33/2.07  								|-Branch two:
% 5.33/2.07  								| (105) member(all_18_1_10, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 5.33/2.07  								| (106) member(all_18_1_10, all_0_4_4) = 0 & member(all_18_1_10, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 5.33/2.07  								|
% 5.33/2.07  									| Applying alpha-rule on (106) yields:
% 5.33/2.07  									| (75) member(all_18_1_10, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 5.33/2.07  									| (33) member(all_18_1_10, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 5.33/2.07  									|
% 5.33/2.07  									| Using (75) and (80) yields:
% 5.33/2.07  									| (83) $false
% 5.33/2.07  									|
% 5.33/2.07  									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 5.33/2.07  							|-Branch two:
% 5.33/2.08  							| (110) member(all_18_1_10, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 5.33/2.08  							| (111) member(all_18_1_10, all_0_5_5) = 0 & member(all_18_1_10, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 5.33/2.08  							|
% 5.33/2.08  								| Applying alpha-rule on (111) yields:
% 5.33/2.08  								| (68) member(all_18_1_10, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 5.33/2.08  								| (33) member(all_18_1_10, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 5.33/2.08  								|
% 5.33/2.08  								| Using (68) and (73) yields:
% 5.33/2.08  								| (83) $false
% 5.33/2.08  								|
% 5.33/2.08  								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 5.33/2.08  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 5.33/2.08  
% 5.33/2.08  1484ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------