TSTP Solution File: SET592+3 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : SET592+3 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory : 2006MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Dec 26 03:03:41 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 0.22s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 55 ( 17 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 48 ( 17 ~; 13 |; 14 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 0 sgn 18 !; 6 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(4,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( subset(X1,X2)
& subset(X1,X3) )
=> subset(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
file('/tmp/tmpqyjaFQ/sel_SET592+3.p_1',intersection_of_subsets) ).
fof(8,axiom,
! [X1] :
( subset(X1,empty_set)
=> X1 = empty_set ),
file('/tmp/tmpqyjaFQ/sel_SET592+3.p_1',subset_of_empty_set_is_empty_set) ).
fof(11,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( subset(X1,X2)
& subset(X1,X3)
& intersection(X2,X3) = empty_set )
=> X1 = empty_set ),
file('/tmp/tmpqyjaFQ/sel_SET592+3.p_1',prove_th51) ).
fof(12,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( subset(X1,X2)
& subset(X1,X3)
& intersection(X2,X3) = empty_set )
=> X1 = empty_set ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[11]) ).
fof(31,plain,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ~ subset(X1,X2)
| ~ subset(X1,X3)
| subset(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
fof(32,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ subset(X4,X5)
| ~ subset(X4,X6)
| subset(X4,intersection(X5,X6)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[31]) ).
cnf(33,plain,
( subset(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
| ~ subset(X1,X3)
| ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[32]) ).
fof(55,plain,
! [X1] :
( ~ subset(X1,empty_set)
| X1 = empty_set ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
fof(56,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ subset(X2,empty_set)
| X2 = empty_set ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[55]) ).
cnf(57,plain,
( X1 = empty_set
| ~ subset(X1,empty_set) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[56]) ).
fof(62,negated_conjecture,
? [X1,X2,X3] :
( subset(X1,X2)
& subset(X1,X3)
& intersection(X2,X3) = empty_set
& X1 != empty_set ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
fof(63,negated_conjecture,
? [X4,X5,X6] :
( subset(X4,X5)
& subset(X4,X6)
& intersection(X5,X6) = empty_set
& X4 != empty_set ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[62]) ).
fof(64,negated_conjecture,
( subset(esk4_0,esk5_0)
& subset(esk4_0,esk6_0)
& intersection(esk5_0,esk6_0) = empty_set
& esk4_0 != empty_set ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[63]) ).
cnf(65,negated_conjecture,
esk4_0 != empty_set,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[64]) ).
cnf(66,negated_conjecture,
intersection(esk5_0,esk6_0) = empty_set,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[64]) ).
cnf(67,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk4_0,esk6_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[64]) ).
cnf(68,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk4_0,esk5_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[64]) ).
cnf(75,negated_conjecture,
( subset(X1,empty_set)
| ~ subset(X1,esk6_0)
| ~ subset(X1,esk5_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[33,66,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(121,negated_conjecture,
( subset(esk4_0,empty_set)
| ~ subset(esk4_0,esk5_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[75,67,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(124,negated_conjecture,
( subset(esk4_0,empty_set)
| $false ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[121,68,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(125,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk4_0,empty_set),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[124,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(135,negated_conjecture,
empty_set = esk4_0,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[57,125,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(138,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[135,65,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(139,negated_conjecture,
$false,
138,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/SInE---0.4/Source/sine.py:10: DeprecationWarning: the sets module is deprecated
% from sets import Set
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SET/SET592+3.p
% --creating new selector for []
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpqyjaFQ/sel_SET592+3.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem SET592+3.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SET/SET592+3.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SET/SET592+3.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------