TSTP Solution File: SET592+3 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SET592+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:12:31 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.06s 2.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.06s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 13 unt; 2 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 32 ( 6 equ; 14 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2,plain,
( subset(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
| ~ subset(X1,X3)
| ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yw6iksvr/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_22,negated_conjecture,
intersection(esk5_0,esk6_0) = empty_set,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yw6iksvr/lgb.p',i_0_22) ).
cnf(i_0_23,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk4_0,esk6_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yw6iksvr/lgb.p',i_0_23) ).
cnf(i_0_24,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk4_0,esk5_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yw6iksvr/lgb.p',i_0_24) ).
cnf(i_0_3,plain,
~ member(X1,empty_set),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yw6iksvr/lgb.p',i_0_3) ).
cnf(i_0_8,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yw6iksvr/lgb.p',i_0_8) ).
cnf(i_0_10,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ subset(X2,X1)
| ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yw6iksvr/lgb.p',i_0_10) ).
cnf(i_0_21,negated_conjecture,
esk4_0 != empty_set,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yw6iksvr/lgb.p',i_0_21) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( subset(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
| ~ subset(X1,X3)
| ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
intersection(esk5_0,esk6_0) = empty_set,
i_0_22 ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
( subset(X1,empty_set)
| ~ subset(X1,esk6_0)
| ~ subset(X1,esk5_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk4_0,esk6_0),
i_0_23 ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk4_0,esk5_0),
i_0_24 ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
~ member(X1,empty_set),
i_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
i_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ subset(X2,X1)
| ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
i_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk4_0,empty_set),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_37])]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
subset(empty_set,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
esk4_0 != empty_set,
i_0_21 ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]),c_0_42])]),c_0_43]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SET592+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 09:52:12 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 8.06/2.49 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.06/2.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.06/2.49 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.06/2.49 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 8.06/2.49 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 8.06/2.49 #
% 8.06/2.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 8.06/2.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.06/2.49
% 8.06/2.49 # Proof found!
% 8.06/2.49 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.06/2.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.06/2.49 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.06/2.49
% 8.06/2.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.06/2.49 # User time : 0.026 s
% 8.06/2.49 # System time : 0.006 s
% 8.06/2.49 # Total time : 0.032 s
% 8.06/2.49 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.06/2.49
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------