TSTP Solution File: SET590+3 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : SET590+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 14:34:39 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.57s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 6 unt; 6 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 37 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 36 ( 14 ~; 12 |; 6 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 8 ( 4 >; 4 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 33 ( 2 sgn; 21 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
difference: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_23,type,
member: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_24,type,
subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_25,type,
esk1_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_26,type,
esk2_0: $i ).
tff(decl_27,type,
esk3_0: $i ).
fof(difference_defn,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( member(X3,difference(X1,X2))
<=> ( member(X3,X1)
& ~ member(X3,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',difference_defn) ).
fof(subset_defn,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( subset(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X3] :
( member(X3,X1)
=> member(X3,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subset_defn) ).
fof(prove_th49,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] : subset(difference(X1,X2),X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_th49) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( member(X3,difference(X1,X2))
<=> ( member(X3,X1)
& ~ member(X3,X2) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[difference_defn]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( member(X6,X4)
| ~ member(X6,difference(X4,X5)) )
& ( ~ member(X6,X5)
| ~ member(X6,difference(X4,X5)) )
& ( ~ member(X6,X4)
| member(X6,X5)
| member(X6,difference(X4,X5)) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X7,X8,X9,X10,X11] :
( ( ~ subset(X7,X8)
| ~ member(X9,X7)
| member(X9,X8) )
& ( member(esk1_2(X10,X11),X10)
| subset(X10,X11) )
& ( ~ member(esk1_2(X10,X11),X11)
| subset(X10,X11) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset_defn])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] : subset(difference(X1,X2),X1),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_th49]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,difference(X2,X3)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)
| subset(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(difference(esk2_0,esk3_0),esk2_0),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( subset(difference(X1,X2),X3)
| member(esk1_2(difference(X1,X2),X3),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(difference(esk2_0,esk3_0),esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
subset(difference(X1,X2),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : SET590+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.13/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 09:32:53 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.55 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.57 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.20/0.57 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.57 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.57 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.57 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.57 % Total time : 0.007000 s
% 0.20/0.57 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.57 % Total time : 0.009000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------