TSTP Solution File: SET589^5 by Duper---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Duper---1.0
% Problem : SET589^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : duper %s
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 14:46:55 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 3.82s 4.00s
% Output : Proof 3.82s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : SET589^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.11 % Command : duper %s
% 0.11/0.30 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.30 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 13:37:14 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 3.82/4.00 SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.82/4.00 SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.82/4.00 Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 3.82/4.00 (Not
% 3.82/4.00 (∀ (X Y Z V : a → Prop),
% 3.82/4.00 And (∀ (Xx : a), X Xx → Y Xx) (∀ (Xx : a), Z Xx → V Xx) →
% 3.82/4.00 ∀ (Xx : a), And (X Xx) (Not (V Xx)) → And (Y Xx) (Not (Z Xx))))
% 3.82/4.00 True
% 3.82/4.00 Clause #1 (by clausification #[0]): Eq
% 3.82/4.00 (∀ (X Y Z V : a → Prop),
% 3.82/4.00 And (∀ (Xx : a), X Xx → Y Xx) (∀ (Xx : a), Z Xx → V Xx) →
% 3.82/4.00 ∀ (Xx : a), And (X Xx) (Not (V Xx)) → And (Y Xx) (Not (Z Xx)))
% 3.82/4.00 False
% 3.82/4.00 Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): ∀ (a_1 : a → Prop),
% 3.82/4.00 Eq
% 3.82/4.00 (Not
% 3.82/4.00 (∀ (Y Z V : a → Prop),
% 3.82/4.00 And (∀ (Xx : a), skS.0 0 a_1 Xx → Y Xx) (∀ (Xx : a), Z Xx → V Xx) →
% 3.82/4.00 ∀ (Xx : a), And (skS.0 0 a_1 Xx) (Not (V Xx)) → And (Y Xx) (Not (Z Xx))))
% 3.82/4.00 True
% 3.82/4.00 Clause #3 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a_1 : a → Prop),
% 3.82/4.00 Eq
% 3.82/4.00 (∀ (Y Z V : a → Prop),
% 3.82/4.00 And (∀ (Xx : a), skS.0 0 a_1 Xx → Y Xx) (∀ (Xx : a), Z Xx → V Xx) →
% 3.82/4.00 ∀ (Xx : a), And (skS.0 0 a_1 Xx) (Not (V Xx)) → And (Y Xx) (Not (Z Xx)))
% 3.82/4.00 False
% 3.82/4.00 Clause #4 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 : a → Prop),
% 3.82/4.00 Eq
% 3.82/4.00 (Not
% 3.82/4.00 (∀ (Z V : a → Prop),
% 3.82/4.00 And (∀ (Xx : a), skS.0 0 a_1 Xx → skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 Xx) (∀ (Xx : a), Z Xx → V Xx) →
% 3.82/4.00 ∀ (Xx : a), And (skS.0 0 a_1 Xx) (Not (V Xx)) → And (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 Xx) (Not (Z Xx))))
% 3.82/4.00 True
% 3.82/4.00 Clause #5 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 : a → Prop),
% 3.82/4.00 Eq
% 3.82/4.00 (∀ (Z V : a → Prop),
% 3.82/4.00 And (∀ (Xx : a), skS.0 0 a_1 Xx → skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 Xx) (∀ (Xx : a), Z Xx → V Xx) →
% 3.82/4.00 ∀ (Xx : a), And (skS.0 0 a_1 Xx) (Not (V Xx)) → And (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 Xx) (Not (Z Xx)))
% 3.82/4.00 False
% 3.82/4.00 Clause #6 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 : a → Prop),
% 3.82/4.00 Eq
% 3.82/4.00 (Not
% 3.82/4.00 (∀ (V : a → Prop),
% 3.82/4.00 And (∀ (Xx : a), skS.0 0 a_1 Xx → skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 Xx) (∀ (Xx : a), skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3 Xx → V Xx) →
% 3.82/4.00 ∀ (Xx : a), And (skS.0 0 a_1 Xx) (Not (V Xx)) → And (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 Xx) (Not (skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3 Xx))))
% 3.82/4.00 True
% 3.82/4.00 Clause #7 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 : a → Prop),
% 3.82/4.00 Eq
% 3.82/4.00 (∀ (V : a → Prop),
% 3.82/4.00 And (∀ (Xx : a), skS.0 0 a_1 Xx → skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 Xx) (∀ (Xx : a), skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3 Xx → V Xx) →
% 3.82/4.00 ∀ (Xx : a), And (skS.0 0 a_1 Xx) (Not (V Xx)) → And (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 Xx) (Not (skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3 Xx)))
% 3.82/4.00 False
% 3.82/4.00 Clause #8 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 : a → Prop),
% 3.82/4.00 Eq
% 3.82/4.00 (Not
% 3.82/4.00 (And (∀ (Xx : a), skS.0 0 a_1 Xx → skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 Xx)
% 3.82/4.00 (∀ (Xx : a), skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3 Xx → skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 Xx) →
% 3.82/4.00 ∀ (Xx : a),
% 3.82/4.00 And (skS.0 0 a_1 Xx) (Not (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 Xx)) →
% 3.82/4.00 And (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 Xx) (Not (skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3 Xx))))
% 3.82/4.00 True
% 3.82/4.00 Clause #9 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 : a → Prop),
% 3.82/4.00 Eq
% 3.82/4.00 (And (∀ (Xx : a), skS.0 0 a_1 Xx → skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 Xx)
% 3.82/4.00 (∀ (Xx : a), skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3 Xx → skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 Xx) →
% 3.82/4.00 ∀ (Xx : a),
% 3.82/4.00 And (skS.0 0 a_1 Xx) (Not (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 Xx)) →
% 3.82/4.00 And (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 Xx) (Not (skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3 Xx)))
% 3.82/4.00 False
% 3.82/4.00 Clause #10 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 : a → Prop),
% 3.82/4.00 Eq
% 3.82/4.00 (And (∀ (Xx : a), skS.0 0 a_1 Xx → skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 Xx)
% 3.82/4.00 (∀ (Xx : a), skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3 Xx → skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 Xx))
% 3.82/4.00 True
% 3.82/4.00 Clause #11 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 : a → Prop),
% 3.82/4.00 Eq
% 3.82/4.00 (∀ (Xx : a),
% 3.82/4.00 And (skS.0 0 a_1 Xx) (Not (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 Xx)) → And (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 Xx) (Not (skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3 Xx)))
% 3.82/4.00 False
% 3.82/4.00 Clause #12 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 : a → Prop), Eq (∀ (Xx : a), skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3 Xx → skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 Xx) True
% 3.82/4.00 Clause #13 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 : a → Prop), Eq (∀ (Xx : a), skS.0 0 a_1 Xx → skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 Xx) True
% 3.82/4.00 Clause #14 (by clausification #[12]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 : a → Prop) (a_4 : a) (a_5 : a → Prop), Eq (skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 → skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_5 a_4) True
% 3.82/4.03 Clause #15 (by clausification #[14]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 : a → Prop) (a_4 : a) (a_5 : a → Prop),
% 3.82/4.03 Or (Eq (skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4) False) (Eq (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_5 a_4) True)
% 3.82/4.03 Clause #16 (by clausification #[13]): ∀ (a_1 : a → Prop) (a_2 : a) (a_3 : a → Prop), Eq (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2 → skS.0 1 a_1 a_3 a_2) True
% 3.82/4.03 Clause #17 (by clausification #[16]): ∀ (a_1 : a → Prop) (a_2 : a) (a_3 : a → Prop), Or (Eq (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2) False) (Eq (skS.0 1 a_1 a_3 a_2) True)
% 3.82/4.03 Clause #18 (by clausification #[11]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 : a → Prop) (a_5 : a),
% 3.82/4.03 Eq
% 3.82/4.03 (Not
% 3.82/4.03 (And (skS.0 0 a_1 (skS.0 4 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 a_5)) (Not (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 (skS.0 4 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 a_5))) →
% 3.82/4.03 And (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 (skS.0 4 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 a_5)) (Not (skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3 (skS.0 4 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 a_5)))))
% 3.82/4.03 True
% 3.82/4.03 Clause #19 (by clausification #[18]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 : a → Prop) (a_5 : a),
% 3.82/4.03 Eq
% 3.82/4.03 (And (skS.0 0 a_1 (skS.0 4 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 a_5)) (Not (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 (skS.0 4 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 a_5))) →
% 3.82/4.03 And (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 (skS.0 4 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 a_5)) (Not (skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3 (skS.0 4 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 a_5))))
% 3.82/4.03 False
% 3.82/4.03 Clause #20 (by clausification #[19]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 : a → Prop) (a_5 : a),
% 3.82/4.03 Eq (And (skS.0 0 a_1 (skS.0 4 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 a_5)) (Not (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 (skS.0 4 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 a_5))))
% 3.82/4.03 True
% 3.82/4.03 Clause #21 (by clausification #[19]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 : a → Prop) (a_5 : a),
% 3.82/4.03 Eq (And (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 (skS.0 4 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 a_5)) (Not (skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3 (skS.0 4 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 a_5))))
% 3.82/4.03 False
% 3.82/4.03 Clause #22 (by clausification #[20]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 : a → Prop) (a_5 : a), Eq (Not (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 (skS.0 4 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 a_5))) True
% 3.82/4.03 Clause #23 (by clausification #[20]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 : a → Prop) (a_5 : a), Eq (skS.0 0 a_1 (skS.0 4 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 a_5)) True
% 3.82/4.03 Clause #24 (by clausification #[22]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 : a → Prop) (a_5 : a), Eq (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 (skS.0 4 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 a_5)) False
% 3.82/4.03 Clause #25 (by superposition #[23, 17]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 a_5 : a → Prop) (a_6 : a),
% 3.82/4.03 Or (Eq True False) (Eq (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 (skS.0 4 a_1 a_3 a_4 a_5 a_6)) True)
% 3.82/4.03 Clause #26 (by clausification #[25]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 a_5 : a → Prop) (a_6 : a), Eq (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 (skS.0 4 a_1 a_3 a_4 a_5 a_6)) True
% 3.82/4.03 Clause #27 (by clausification #[21]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 : a → Prop) (a_5 : a),
% 3.82/4.03 Or (Eq (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 (skS.0 4 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 a_5)) False)
% 3.82/4.03 (Eq (Not (skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3 (skS.0 4 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 a_5))) False)
% 3.82/4.03 Clause #28 (by clausification #[27]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 : a → Prop) (a_5 : a),
% 3.82/4.03 Or (Eq (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 (skS.0 4 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 a_5)) False)
% 3.82/4.03 (Eq (skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3 (skS.0 4 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 a_5)) True)
% 3.82/4.03 Clause #29 (by forward demodulation #[28, 26]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 : a → Prop) (a_5 : a),
% 3.82/4.03 Or (Eq True False) (Eq (skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3 (skS.0 4 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 a_5)) True)
% 3.82/4.03 Clause #30 (by clausification #[29]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 : a → Prop) (a_5 : a), Eq (skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3 (skS.0 4 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 a_5)) True
% 3.82/4.03 Clause #31 (by superposition #[30, 15]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 a_5 : a → Prop) (a_6 : a),
% 3.82/4.03 Or (Eq True False) (Eq (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 (skS.0 4 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_5 a_6)) True)
% 3.82/4.03 Clause #32 (by clausification #[31]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 a_5 : a → Prop) (a_6 : a), Eq (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 (skS.0 4 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_5 a_6)) True
% 3.82/4.03 Clause #33 (by superposition #[32, 24]): Eq True False
% 3.82/4.03 Clause #34 (by clausification #[33]): False
% 3.82/4.03 SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------