TSTP Solution File: SET587+3 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SET587+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:23:01 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 408.11s 136.56s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 408.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   83 (  13 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   86 (  37   ~;  32   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   60 (   5 sgn;  28   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(difference_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( member(X3,difference(X1,X2))
    <=> ( member(X3,X1)
        & ~ member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.z8wL1WTtpc/E---3.1_17224.p',difference_defn) ).

fof(prove_difference_empty_set,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( difference(X1,X2) = empty_set
    <=> subset(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.z8wL1WTtpc/E---3.1_17224.p',prove_difference_empty_set) ).

fof(empty_set_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1] : ~ member(X1,empty_set),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.z8wL1WTtpc/E---3.1_17224.p',empty_set_defn) ).

fof(subset_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
         => member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.z8wL1WTtpc/E---3.1_17224.p',subset_defn) ).

fof(equal_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X1 = X2
    <=> ( subset(X1,X2)
        & subset(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.z8wL1WTtpc/E---3.1_17224.p',equal_defn) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( member(X3,difference(X1,X2))
    <=> ( member(X3,X1)
        & ~ member(X3,X2) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[difference_defn]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( difference(X1,X2) = empty_set
      <=> subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_difference_empty_set]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X1] : ~ member(X1,empty_set),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[empty_set_defn]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X16,X17,X18] :
      ( ( member(X18,X16)
        | ~ member(X18,difference(X16,X17)) )
      & ( ~ member(X18,X17)
        | ~ member(X18,difference(X16,X17)) )
      & ( ~ member(X18,X16)
        | member(X18,X17)
        | member(X18,difference(X16,X17)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( difference(esk1_0,esk2_0) != empty_set
      | ~ subset(esk1_0,esk2_0) )
    & ( difference(esk1_0,esk2_0) = empty_set
      | subset(esk1_0,esk2_0) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X15] : ~ member(X15,empty_set),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X6,X7,X8,X9,X10] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X6,X7)
        | ~ member(X8,X6)
        | member(X8,X7) )
      & ( member(esk3_2(X9,X10),X9)
        | subset(X9,X10) )
      & ( ~ member(esk3_2(X9,X10),X10)
        | subset(X9,X10) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset_defn])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( member(X1,X3)
    | member(X1,difference(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( difference(esk1_0,esk2_0) = empty_set
    | subset(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ~ member(X1,empty_set),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( member(X3,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,difference(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( member(esk3_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(X1,esk2_0)
    | ~ member(X1,esk1_0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X12,X13] :
      ( ( subset(X12,X13)
        | X12 != X13 )
      & ( subset(X13,X12)
        | X12 != X13 )
      & ( ~ subset(X12,X13)
        | ~ subset(X13,X12)
        | X12 = X13 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[equal_defn])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( subset(difference(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ member(esk3_2(difference(X1,X2),X3),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,difference(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(X1,esk2_0)
    | ~ member(esk3_2(X1,esk2_0),esk1_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    subset(empty_set,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(difference(X1,esk2_0),X2)
    | ~ member(esk3_2(difference(X1,esk2_0),X2),esk1_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( subset(difference(X1,X2),X3)
    | member(esk3_2(difference(X1,X2),X3),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( difference(esk1_0,esk2_0) != empty_set
    | ~ subset(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | ~ subset(X1,empty_set) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    subset(difference(esk1_0,esk2_0),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    difference(esk1_0,esk2_0) != empty_set,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29])]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : SET587+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.06/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 16:15:54 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.48  Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.z8wL1WTtpc/E---3.1_17224.p
% 408.11/136.56  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 408.11/136.56  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 408.11/136.56  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 408.11/136.56  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 408.11/136.56  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.11/136.56  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.11/136.56  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 408.11/136.56  # new_bool_3 with pid 17347 completed with status 0
% 408.11/136.56  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 408.11/136.56  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 408.11/136.56  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 408.11/136.56  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 408.11/136.56  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.11/136.56  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 408.11/136.56  # Search class: FGHSF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 408.11/136.56  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 408.11/136.56  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 408.11/136.56  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 17353 completed with status 0
% 408.11/136.56  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 408.11/136.56  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 408.11/136.56  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 408.11/136.56  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 408.11/136.56  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.11/136.56  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 408.11/136.56  # Search class: FGHSF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 408.11/136.56  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 408.11/136.56  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 408.11/136.56  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 408.11/136.56  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 408.11/136.56  
% 408.11/136.56  # Proof found!
% 408.11/136.56  # SZS status Theorem
% 408.11/136.56  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 408.11/136.56  # Parsed axioms                        : 9
% 408.11/136.56  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 1
% 408.11/136.56  # Initial clauses                      : 19
% 408.11/136.56  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 408.11/136.56  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 17
% 408.11/136.56  # Processed clauses                    : 48
% 408.11/136.56  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 408.11/136.56  # ...subsumed                          : 4
% 408.11/136.56  # ...remaining for further processing  : 44
% 408.11/136.56  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 408.11/136.56  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 408.11/136.56  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 408.11/136.56  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 408.11/136.56  # Generated clauses                    : 38
% 408.11/136.56  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 29
% 408.11/136.56  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 408.11/136.56  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 408.11/136.56  # Paramodulations                      : 36
% 408.11/136.56  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 408.11/136.56  # NegExts                              : 0
% 408.11/136.56  # Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 408.11/136.56  # Total rewrite steps                  : 5
% 408.11/136.56  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 408.11/136.56  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 408.11/136.56  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 408.11/136.56  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 408.11/136.56  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 408.11/136.56  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 408.11/136.56  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 408.11/136.56  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 408.11/136.56  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 408.11/136.56  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 408.11/136.56  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 408.11/136.56  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 408.11/136.56  # Current number of processed clauses  : 25
% 408.11/136.56  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
% 408.11/136.56  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 408.11/136.56  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 408.11/136.56  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 18
% 408.11/136.56  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 13
% 408.11/136.56  # ...number of literals in the above   : 31
% 408.11/136.56  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 408.11/136.56  # Current number of archived clauses   : 17
% 408.11/136.56  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 38
% 408.11/136.56  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 35
% 408.11/136.56  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
% 408.11/136.56  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 408.11/136.56  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 408.11/136.56  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 408.11/136.56  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 408.11/136.56  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 408.11/136.56  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 408.11/136.56  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1517
% 408.11/136.56  
% 408.11/136.56  # -------------------------------------------------
% 408.11/136.56  # User time                : 0.003 s
% 408.11/136.56  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 408.11/136.56  # Total time               : 0.007 s
% 408.11/136.56  # Maximum resident set size: 1732 pages
% 408.11/136.56  
% 408.11/136.56  # -------------------------------------------------
% 408.11/136.56  # User time                : 0.004 s
% 408.11/136.56  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 408.11/136.56  # Total time               : 0.010 s
% 408.11/136.56  # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 408.11/136.56  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------