TSTP Solution File: SET585+3 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : SET585+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 04:30:26 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.43s 0.98s
% Output : Refutation 0.43s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SET585+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 14:01:12 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.43/0.98 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.43/0.98 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.43/0.98 Process 12757 was started by sandbox on n018.cluster.edu,
% 0.43/0.98 Sun Jul 10 14:01:13 2022
% 0.43/0.98 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_12604_n018.cluster.edu".
% 0.43/0.98 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.43/0.98
% 0.43/0.98 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.43/0.98
% 0.43/0.98 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_12604_n018.cluster.edu
% 0.43/0.98
% 0.43/0.98 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.43/0.98 set(auto2).
% 0.43/0.98 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.43/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.43/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.43/0.98 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.43/0.98 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.43/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.43/0.98 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.43/0.98 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.43/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.43/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.43/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.43/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.43/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.43/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.43/0.98 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.43/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.43/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.43/0.98 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.43/0.98 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.43/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.43/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.43/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.43/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.43/0.98 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.43/0.98 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.43/0.98 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.43/0.98 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.43/0.98 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.43/0.98 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.43/0.98 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.43/0.98 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.43/0.98 clear(print_given).
% 0.43/0.98
% 0.43/0.98 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (11 formulas)
% 0.43/0.98
% 0.43/0.98 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.43/0.98
% 0.43/0.98 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.43/0.98
% 0.43/0.98 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.43/0.98
% 0.43/0.98 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.43/0.98 1 (all B all C all D (subset(B,C) & subset(C,D) -> subset(B,D))) # label(transitivity_of_subset) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.43/0.98 2 (all B all C subset(B,union(B,C))) # label(subset_of_union) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.43/0.98 3 (all B all C subset(intersection(B,C),B)) # label(intersection_is_subset) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.43/0.98 4 (all B all C all D (member(D,union(B,C)) <-> member(D,B) | member(D,C))) # label(union_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.43/0.98 5 (all B all C all D (member(D,intersection(B,C)) <-> member(D,B) & member(D,C))) # label(intersection_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.43/0.98 6 (all B all C (subset(B,C) <-> (all D (member(D,B) -> member(D,C))))) # label(subset_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.43/0.98 7 (all B all C union(B,C) = union(C,B)) # label(commutativity_of_union) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.43/0.98 8 (all B all C intersection(B,C) = intersection(C,B)) # label(commutativity_of_intersection) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.43/0.98 9 (all B subset(B,B)) # label(reflexivity_of_subset) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.43/0.98 10 (all B all C (B = C <-> (all D (member(D,B) <-> member(D,C))))) # label(equal_member_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.43/0.98 11 -(all B all C all D subset(intersection(B,C),union(B,D))) # label(prove_intersection_subset_of_union) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.43/0.98
% 0.43/0.98 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.43/0.98
% 0.43/0.98 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.43/0.98
% 0.43/0.98 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.43/0.98
% 0.43/0.98 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.43/0.98
% 0.43/0.98 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.43/0.98
% 0.43/0.98 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.43/0.98 Function symbol KB weights: c1=1. c2=1. c3=1. intersection=1. union=1. f1=1. f2=1.
% 0.43/0.98
% 0.43/0.98 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.43/0.98
% 0.43/0.98 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.43/0.98
% 0.43/0.98 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.43/0.98
% 0.43/0.98 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.43/0.98
% 0.43/0.98 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.43/0.98
% 0.43/0.98 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.43/0.98 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.43/0.98 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.43/0.98
% 0.43/0.98 % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.43/0.98 % Length of proof is 9.
% 0.43/0.98 % Level of proof is 2.
% 0.43/0.98 % Maximum clause weight is 9.000.
% 0.43/0.98 % Given clauses 14.
% 0.43/0.98
% 0.43/0.98 1 (all B all C all D (subset(B,C) & subset(C,D) -> subset(B,D))) # label(transitivity_of_subset) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.43/0.98 2 (all B all C subset(B,union(B,C))) # label(subset_of_union) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.43/0.98 3 (all B all C subset(intersection(B,C),B)) # label(intersection_is_subset) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.43/0.98 11 -(all B all C all D subset(intersection(B,C),union(B,D))) # label(prove_intersection_subset_of_union) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.43/0.98 13 subset(A,union(A,B)) # label(subset_of_union) # label(axiom). [clausify(2)].
% 0.43/0.98 14 subset(intersection(A,B),A) # label(intersection_is_subset) # label(axiom). [clausify(3)].
% 0.43/0.98 19 -subset(intersection(c1,c2),union(c1,c3)) # label(prove_intersection_subset_of_union) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(11)].
% 0.43/0.98 25 -subset(A,B) | -subset(B,C) | subset(A,C) # label(transitivity_of_subset) # label(axiom). [clausify(1)].
% 0.43/0.98 55 $F. [ur(25,b,13,a,c,19,a),unit_del(a,14)].
% 0.43/0.98
% 0.43/0.98 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.43/0.98 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.43/0.98
% 0.43/0.98 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.43/0.98
% 0.43/0.98 Given=14. Generated=63. Kept=43. proofs=1.
% 0.43/0.98 Usable=14. Sos=22. Demods=2. Limbo=7, Disabled=20. Hints=0.
% 0.43/0.98 Megabytes=0.07.
% 0.43/0.98 User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.43/0.98
% 0.43/0.98 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.43/0.98
% 0.43/0.98 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.43/0.98
% 0.43/0.98 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.43/0.98 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.43/0.98
% 0.43/0.98 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.43/0.98
% 0.43/0.98 Process 12757 exit (max_proofs) Sun Jul 10 14:01:13 2022
% 0.43/0.98 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------