TSTP Solution File: SET583+3 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : SET583+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 04:30:25 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.44s 0.98s
% Output : Refutation 0.44s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SET583+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jul 9 16:30:59 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.44/0.98 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.44/0.98 Process 29201 was started by sandbox on n013.cluster.edu,
% 0.44/0.98 Sat Jul 9 16:31:00 2022
% 0.44/0.98 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_29047_n013.cluster.edu".
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_29047_n013.cluster.edu
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.44/0.98 set(auto2).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.44/0.98 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.44/0.98 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.44/0.98 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.44/0.98 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.44/0.98 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.44/0.98 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.44/0.98 clear(print_given).
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (4 formulas)
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.44/0.98 1 (all B all C (B = C <-> subset(B,C) & subset(C,B))) # label(equal_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 2 (all B all C (subset(B,C) <-> (all D (member(D,B) -> member(D,C))))) # label(subset_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 3 (all B subset(B,B)) # label(reflexivity_of_subset) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 4 -(all B all C (subset(B,C) & subset(C,B) -> B = C)) # label(prove_extensionality) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.44/0.98 Function symbol KB weights: c1=1. c2=1. f1=1.
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.44/0.98 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.44/0.98 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.44/0.98 % Length of proof is 7.
% 0.44/0.98 % Level of proof is 2.
% 0.44/0.98 % Maximum clause weight is 9.000.
% 0.44/0.98 % Given clauses 9.
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 1 (all B all C (B = C <-> subset(B,C) & subset(C,B))) # label(equal_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 4 -(all B all C (subset(B,C) & subset(C,B) -> B = C)) # label(prove_extensionality) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 6 subset(c1,c2) # label(prove_extensionality) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(4)].
% 0.44/0.98 7 subset(c2,c1) # label(prove_extensionality) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(4)].
% 0.44/0.98 9 c2 != c1 # label(prove_extensionality) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(4)].
% 0.44/0.98 13 A = B | -subset(B,A) | -subset(A,B) # label(equal_defn) # label(axiom). [clausify(1)].
% 0.44/0.98 15 $F. [resolve(13,b,7,a),flip(a),unit_del(a,9),unit_del(b,6)].
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 Given=9. Generated=15. Kept=10. proofs=1.
% 0.44/0.98 Usable=9. Sos=1. Demods=0. Limbo=0, Disabled=10. Hints=0.
% 0.44/0.98 Megabytes=0.03.
% 0.44/0.98 User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.44/0.98 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 Process 29201 exit (max_proofs) Sat Jul 9 16:31:00 2022
% 0.44/0.98 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------