TSTP Solution File: SET583+3 by Princess---230619
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Princess---230619
% Problem : SET583+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 15:25:24 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 3.62s 1.33s
% Output : Proof 5.49s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SET583+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.10/0.32 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.32 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 08:54:30 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.60 ________ _____
% 0.16/0.60 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.16/0.60 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/
% 0.16/0.60 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ )
% 0.16/0.60 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.16/0.60
% 0.16/0.60 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.16/0.60 (2023-06-19)
% 0.16/0.60
% 0.16/0.60 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.16/0.60 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.16/0.60 Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.16/0.60 Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.16/0.60
% 0.16/0.60 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.16/0.60
% 0.16/0.60 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.16/0.62 Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.16/0.64 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.16/0.64 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.16/0.64 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.16/0.64 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.16/0.64 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.16/0.64 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.16/0.64 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 1.73/1.02 Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 1.73/1.02 Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.29/1.08 Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.29/1.08 Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.29/1.08 Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.29/1.08 Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.29/1.08 Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 3.21/1.21 Prover 2: Proving ...
% 3.21/1.21 Prover 6: Proving ...
% 3.21/1.21 Prover 5: Proving ...
% 3.21/1.22 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.21/1.24 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.21/1.25 Prover 0: Proving ...
% 3.62/1.27 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.62/1.33 Prover 2: proved (698ms)
% 3.62/1.33
% 3.62/1.33 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.62/1.33
% 3.62/1.33 Prover 3: stopped
% 3.62/1.33 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 3.62/1.33 Prover 6: stopped
% 3.62/1.35 Prover 0: stopped
% 3.62/1.35 Prover 5: stopped
% 3.62/1.35 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 3.62/1.35 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 3.62/1.35 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 3.62/1.35 Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 3.62/1.35 Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 3.62/1.36 Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 3.62/1.37 Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 4.33/1.37 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 4.33/1.38 Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 4.33/1.38 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.33/1.40 Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 4.33/1.40 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.33/1.41 Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 4.33/1.44 Prover 4: Found proof (size 14)
% 4.33/1.44 Prover 4: proved (800ms)
% 4.33/1.44 Prover 7: Found proof (size 6)
% 4.33/1.44 Prover 7: proved (109ms)
% 4.33/1.44 Prover 1: stopped
% 4.33/1.44 Prover 10: stopped
% 4.33/1.47 Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 4.33/1.47 Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.33/1.47 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 4.33/1.47 Prover 13: stopped
% 4.33/1.48 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.33/1.48 Prover 8: stopped
% 4.33/1.50 Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.33/1.51 Prover 11: stopped
% 4.33/1.51
% 4.33/1.51 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.33/1.51
% 4.33/1.51 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 4.33/1.51 Assumptions after simplification:
% 4.33/1.51 ---------------------------------
% 4.33/1.51
% 4.33/1.51 (equal_defn)
% 4.33/1.56 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (subset(v1, v0) = 0) | ~ $i(v1) |
% 4.33/1.56 ~ $i(v0) | ? [v2: int] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & subset(v0, v1) = v2)) & ! [v0: $i]
% 4.33/1.56 : ! [v1: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (subset(v0, v1) = 0) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) |
% 4.33/1.56 ? [v2: int] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & subset(v1, v0) = v2)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1:
% 4.33/1.56 int] : (v1 = 0 | ~ (subset(v0, v0) = v1) | ~ $i(v0))
% 4.33/1.56
% 4.33/1.56 (prove_extensionality)
% 4.33/1.56 ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & subset(v1, v0) = 0 & subset(v0,
% 4.33/1.56 v1) = 0 & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 4.60/1.56
% 4.60/1.56 (function-axioms)
% 4.60/1.57 ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : !
% 4.60/1.57 [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (member(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (member(v3, v2) = v0)) &
% 4.60/1.57 ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3:
% 4.60/1.57 $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (subset(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (subset(v3, v2) = v0))
% 4.60/1.57
% 4.60/1.57 Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 4.60/1.57 --------------------------------------------
% 4.60/1.57 reflexivity_of_subset, subset_defn
% 4.60/1.57
% 4.60/1.57 Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 4.60/1.57 ---------------------------------
% 4.60/1.57
% 4.60/1.57 Begin of proof
% 4.60/1.57 |
% 4.60/1.57 | ALPHA: (equal_defn) implies:
% 4.60/1.57 | (1) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (subset(v1, v0) = 0) | ~
% 4.60/1.57 | $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v2: int] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & subset(v0, v1) =
% 4.60/1.57 | v2))
% 4.60/1.57 |
% 4.60/1.57 | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 4.60/1.58 | (2) ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] :
% 4.60/1.58 | ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (subset(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (subset(v3, v2)
% 4.60/1.58 | = v0))
% 4.60/1.58 |
% 4.60/1.58 | DELTA: instantiating (prove_extensionality) with fresh symbols all_6_0,
% 4.60/1.58 | all_6_1 gives:
% 4.60/1.58 | (3) ~ (all_6_0 = all_6_1) & subset(all_6_0, all_6_1) = 0 & subset(all_6_1,
% 4.60/1.58 | all_6_0) = 0 & $i(all_6_0) & $i(all_6_1)
% 4.60/1.58 |
% 4.60/1.58 | ALPHA: (3) implies:
% 4.60/1.58 | (4) ~ (all_6_0 = all_6_1)
% 4.60/1.58 | (5) $i(all_6_1)
% 4.60/1.58 | (6) $i(all_6_0)
% 4.60/1.58 | (7) subset(all_6_1, all_6_0) = 0
% 4.60/1.58 | (8) subset(all_6_0, all_6_1) = 0
% 4.60/1.58 |
% 4.60/1.59 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_6_1, all_6_0, simplifying with (5),
% 4.60/1.59 | (6), (8) gives:
% 4.60/1.59 | (9) all_6_0 = all_6_1 | ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & subset(all_6_1,
% 4.60/1.59 | all_6_0) = v0)
% 4.60/1.59 |
% 4.60/1.59 | BETA: splitting (9) gives:
% 4.60/1.59 |
% 4.60/1.59 | Case 1:
% 4.60/1.59 | |
% 4.60/1.59 | | (10) all_6_0 = all_6_1
% 4.60/1.59 | |
% 4.60/1.59 | | REDUCE: (4), (10) imply:
% 4.60/1.59 | | (11) $false
% 4.60/1.59 | |
% 4.60/1.59 | | CLOSE: (11) is inconsistent.
% 4.60/1.59 | |
% 4.60/1.59 | Case 2:
% 4.60/1.59 | |
% 5.48/1.59 | | (12) ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & subset(all_6_1, all_6_0) = v0)
% 5.48/1.59 | |
% 5.48/1.59 | | DELTA: instantiating (12) with fresh symbol all_15_0 gives:
% 5.48/1.59 | | (13) ~ (all_15_0 = 0) & subset(all_6_1, all_6_0) = all_15_0
% 5.48/1.59 | |
% 5.48/1.59 | | ALPHA: (13) implies:
% 5.48/1.59 | | (14) ~ (all_15_0 = 0)
% 5.48/1.59 | | (15) subset(all_6_1, all_6_0) = all_15_0
% 5.48/1.59 | |
% 5.49/1.59 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with 0, all_15_0, all_6_0, all_6_1,
% 5.49/1.59 | | simplifying with (7), (15) gives:
% 5.49/1.60 | | (16) all_15_0 = 0
% 5.49/1.60 | |
% 5.49/1.60 | | REDUCE: (14), (16) imply:
% 5.49/1.60 | | (17) $false
% 5.49/1.60 | |
% 5.49/1.60 | | CLOSE: (17) is inconsistent.
% 5.49/1.60 | |
% 5.49/1.60 | End of split
% 5.49/1.60 |
% 5.49/1.60 End of proof
% 5.49/1.60 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 5.49/1.60
% 5.49/1.60 993ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------