TSTP Solution File: SET581+3 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SET581+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:23:00 EDT 2023

% Result   : Timeout 408.24s 300.19s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   41 (   5 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   40 (  18   ~;  10   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (   1 sgn;  19   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_th24,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( member(X1,X2)
        & member(X1,X3) )
     => not_equal(intersection(X2,X3),empty_set) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.gIjo2Jh24H/E---3.1_25540.p',prove_th24) ).

fof(not_equal_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( not_equal(X1,X2)
    <=> X1 != X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.gIjo2Jh24H/E---3.1_25540.p',not_equal_defn) ).

fof(empty_set_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1] : ~ member(X1,empty_set),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.gIjo2Jh24H/E---3.1_25540.p',empty_set_defn) ).

fof(intersection_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( member(X3,intersection(X1,X2))
    <=> ( member(X3,X1)
        & member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.gIjo2Jh24H/E---3.1_25540.p',intersection_defn) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( member(X1,X2)
          & member(X1,X3) )
       => not_equal(intersection(X2,X3),empty_set) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_th24]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & member(esk1_0,esk3_0)
    & ~ not_equal(intersection(esk2_0,esk3_0),empty_set) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X7,X8] :
      ( ( ~ not_equal(X7,X8)
        | X7 != X8 )
      & ( X7 = X8
        | not_equal(X7,X8) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[not_equal_defn])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X1] : ~ member(X1,empty_set),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[empty_set_defn]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X10,X11,X12] :
      ( ( member(X12,X10)
        | ~ member(X12,intersection(X10,X11)) )
      & ( member(X12,X11)
        | ~ member(X12,intersection(X10,X11)) )
      & ( ~ member(X12,X10)
        | ~ member(X12,X11)
        | member(X12,intersection(X10,X11)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[intersection_defn])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ not_equal(intersection(esk2_0,esk3_0),empty_set),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | not_equal(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X9] : ~ member(X9,empty_set),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    intersection(esk2_0,esk3_0) = empty_set,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ~ member(X1,empty_set),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(X1,esk3_0)
    | ~ member(X1,esk2_0) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    member(esk1_0,esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    member(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : SET581+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 16:40:14 EDT 2023
% 0.22/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.22/0.49  Running first-order model finding
% 0.22/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.gIjo2Jh24H/E---3.1_25540.p
% 408.24/300.19  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 408.24/300.19  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 408.24/300.19  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 408.24/300.19  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 408.24/300.19  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.24/300.19  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.24/300.19  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 408.24/300.19  # new_bool_3 with pid 25704 completed with status 0
% 408.24/300.19  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 408.24/300.19  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 408.24/300.19  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 408.24/300.19  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 408.24/300.19  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.24/300.19  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 408.24/300.19  # Search class: FGHSF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 408.24/300.19  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 408.24/300.19  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 408.24/300.19  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 25709 completed with status 0
% 408.24/300.19  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 408.24/300.19  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 408.24/300.19  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 408.24/300.19  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 408.24/300.19  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.24/300.19  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 408.24/300.19  # Search class: FGHSF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 408.24/300.19  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 408.24/300.19  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 408.24/300.19  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 408.24/300.19  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 408.24/300.19  
% 408.24/300.19  # Proof found!
% 408.24/300.19  # SZS status Theorem
% 408.24/300.19  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 408.24/300.19  # Parsed axioms                        : 7
% 408.24/300.19  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 1
% 408.24/300.19  # Initial clauses                      : 14
% 408.24/300.19  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 408.24/300.19  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 12
% 408.24/300.19  # Processed clauses                    : 31
% 408.24/300.19  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 408.24/300.19  # ...subsumed                          : 5
% 408.24/300.19  # ...remaining for further processing  : 26
% 408.24/300.19  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 408.24/300.19  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 408.24/300.19  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 408.24/300.19  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 408.24/300.19  # Generated clauses                    : 15
% 408.24/300.19  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 13
% 408.24/300.19  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 408.24/300.19  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 408.24/300.19  # Paramodulations                      : 14
% 408.24/300.19  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 408.24/300.19  # NegExts                              : 0
% 408.24/300.19  # Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 408.24/300.19  # Total rewrite steps                  : 2
% 408.24/300.19  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 408.24/300.19  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 408.24/300.19  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 408.24/300.19  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 408.24/300.19  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 408.24/300.19  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 408.24/300.19  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 408.24/300.19  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 408.24/300.19  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 408.24/300.19  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 408.24/300.19  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 408.24/300.19  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 408.24/300.19  # Current number of processed clauses  : 12
% 408.24/300.19  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 408.24/300.19  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 408.24/300.19  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 408.24/300.19  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 6
% 408.24/300.19  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6
% 408.24/300.19  # ...number of literals in the above   : 17
% 408.24/300.19  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 408.24/300.19  # Current number of archived clauses   : 13
% 408.24/300.19  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6
% 408.24/300.19  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 408.24/300.19  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
% 408.24/300.19  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 408.24/300.19  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 408.24/300.19  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 9
% 408.24/300.19  # BW rewrite match successes           : 9
% 408.24/300.19  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 408.24/300.19  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 408.24/300.19  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 805
% 408.24/300.19  
% 408.24/300.19  # -------------------------------------------------
% 408.24/300.19  # User time                : 0.005 s
% 408.24/300.19  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 408.24/300.19  # Total time               : 0.007 s
% 408.24/300.19  # Maximum resident set size: 1740 pages
% 408.24/300.19  
% 408.24/300.19  # -------------------------------------------------
% 408.24/300.19  # User time                : 0.007 s
% 408.24/300.19  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 408.24/300.19  # Total time               : 0.010 s
% 408.24/300.19  # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 408.24/300.19  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------