TSTP Solution File: SET563-6 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SET563-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:10:23 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.37s 0.58s
% Output   : Refutation 0.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   13 (   3 equ;   5 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(range_of,axiom,
    domain_of(inverse(X)) = range_of(X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',range_of) ).

cnf(compatible2,axiom,
    ( ~ compatible(X,Y,Z)
    | domain_of(domain_of(Y)) = domain_of(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',compatible2) ).

cnf(compatible3,axiom,
    ( ~ compatible(X,Y,Z)
    | subclass(range_of(X),domain_of(domain_of(Z))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',compatible3) ).

cnf(94,plain,
    ( ~ compatible(X,Y,Z)
    | subclass(domain_of(inverse(X)),domain_of(domain_of(Z))) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[compatible3,range_of,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(prove_compatible_function_property3_1,negated_conjecture,
    compatible(xh1,xf1,xf2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_compatible_function_property3_1) ).

cnf(prove_compatible_function_property3_2,negated_conjecture,
    compatible(xh2,xf2,xf3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_compatible_function_property3_2) ).

cnf(prove_compatible_function_property3_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subclass(range_of(xh1),domain_of(xh2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_compatible_function_property3_3) ).

cnf(130,plain,
    ~ subclass(domain_of(inverse(xh1)),domain_of(xh2)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[prove_compatible_function_property3_3,range_of,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(209,plain,
    domain_of(domain_of(xf2)) = domain_of(xh2),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[compatible2,prove_compatible_function_property3_2]) ).

cnf(230,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[94,prove_compatible_function_property3_1]),130,209,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SET563-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 04:48:02 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  "."
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-11T04:48:02
% 0.19/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n007.cluster.edu at 2022-07-11T04:48:02
% 0.37/0.58  
% 0.37/0.58  
% 0.37/0.58  #||
% 0.37/0.58  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/0.58  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.37/0.58  ||#
% 0.37/0.58  
% 0.37/0.58  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.37/0.58  ;       350 formulas have been input or derived (from 79 formulas).
% 0.37/0.58  ;       230 (66%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.37/0.58  ;           17 ( 7%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.37/0.58  ;          213 (93%) are still being kept.
% 0.37/0.58  ; 
% 0.37/0.58  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.022  23%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.003   3%   Assert                       (115 calls)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.017  18%   Process new row              (308 calls)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.009   9%   Resolution                   (156 calls)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Paramodulation               (78 calls)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (3 calls)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.002   2%   Condensing                   (144 calls)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.006   6%   Forward subsumption          (144 calls)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.002   2%   Backward subsumption         (129 calls)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (75 calls)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.006   6%   Forward simplification       (308 calls)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.002   2%   Backward simplification      (214 calls)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.001   1%   Ordering                     (207 calls)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.026  27%   Other
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.096        Total
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.097        Real time
% 0.37/0.58  ; 
% 0.37/0.58  ; Term-hash-array has 545 terms in all.
% 0.37/0.58  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 129 entries (129 at peak, 129 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.37/0.58  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 667 nodes (667 at peak, 667 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.37/0.58  ;  Retrieved 82 possibly forward subsuming rows in 144 calls.
% 0.37/0.58  ;  Retrieved 14 possibly backward subsumed rows in 129 calls.
% 0.37/0.58  ; Path-index has 561 entries (561 at peak, 562 added, 1 deleted).
% 0.37/0.58  ; Path-index has 1,904 nodes (1,904 at peak, 1,905 added, 1 deleted).
% 0.37/0.58  ; Trie-index has 561 entries (561 at peak, 562 added, 1 deleted).
% 0.37/0.58  ; Trie-index has 1,761 nodes (1,761 at peak, 1,762 added, 1 deleted).
% 0.37/0.58  ; Retrieved 218 generalization terms in 800 calls.
% 0.37/0.58  ; Retrieved 109 instance terms in 84 calls.
% 0.37/0.58  ; Retrieved 3,249 unifiable terms in 521 calls.
% 0.37/0.58  ; 
% 0.37/0.58  ; The agenda of rows to process has 2 entries:
% 0.37/0.58  ;     2 with value 11
% 0.37/0.58  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 36 entries:
% 0.37/0.58  ;     3 with value 15              3 with value 21               1 with value 31
% 0.37/0.58  ;     3 with value 16              4 with value 22               1 with value 33
% 0.37/0.58  ;     5 with value 17              1 with value 24               1 with value 34
% 0.37/0.58  ;     2 with value 18              1 with value 26               2 with value 35
% 0.37/0.58  ;     1 with value 19              1 with value 27               1 with value 50
% 0.37/0.58  ;     4 with value 20              2 with value 30
% 0.37/0.58  ; The agenda of rows to give has 98 entries:
% 0.37/0.58  ;     2 with value (4 4)           9 with value (4 13)           1 with value (4 21)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     2 with value (4 5)           6 with value (4 14)           2 with value (4 22)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     4 with value (4 7)           8 with value (4 15)           1 with value (4 23)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     8 with value (4 8)           8 with value (4 16)           3 with value (4 24)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     3 with value (4 9)           4 with value (4 17)           1 with value (4 26)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     8 with value (4 10)          3 with value (4 18)           2 with value (4 28)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     6 with value (4 11)          7 with value (4 19)           1 with value (4 29)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     3 with value (4 12)          4 with value (4 20)           2 with value (4 30)
% 0.37/0.58  Evaluation took:
% 0.37/0.58    0.098 seconds of real time
% 0.37/0.58    0.085724 seconds of user run time
% 0.37/0.58    0.011885 seconds of system run time
% 0.37/0.58    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.37/0.58    0 page faults and
% 0.37/0.58    5,244,728 bytes consed.
% 0.37/0.58  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.37/0.58  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-11T04:48:02
% 0.37/0.58  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.37/0.58  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------