TSTP Solution File: SET553-6 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SET553-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:26:54 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.69s 1.88s
% Output   : Refutation 1.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (   5 unt;   3 nHn;  10 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   15 (   0 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ~ subclass(cantor(x__dfg),domain_of(x__dfg)),
    file('SET553-6.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( subclass(u,v)
    | member(not_subclass_element(u,v),u) ),
    file('SET553-6.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ( ~ member(not_subclass_element(u,v),v)
    | subclass(u,v) ),
    file('SET553-6.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(22,axiom,
    ( ~ member(u,intersection(v,w))
    | member(u,v) ),
    file('SET553-6.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(78,axiom,
    equal(intersection(domain_of(u),diagonalise(compose(inverse(element_relation),u))),cantor(u)),
    file('SET553-6.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(184,plain,
    ( subclass(intersection(u,v),w)
    | member(not_subclass_element(intersection(u,v),w),u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[3,22]),
    [iquote('0:Res:3.1,22.0')] ).

cnf(8720,plain,
    ( subclass(intersection(u,v),u)
    | subclass(intersection(u,v),u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[184,4]),
    [iquote('0:Res:184.1,4.0')] ).

cnf(8724,plain,
    subclass(intersection(u,v),u),
    inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[8720]),
    [iquote('0:Obv:8720.0')] ).

cnf(8959,plain,
    subclass(cantor(u),domain_of(u)),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[78,8724]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:78.0,8724.0')] ).

cnf(8981,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unc,[status(thm)],[8959,1]),
    [iquote('0:UnC:8959.0,1.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : SET553-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 00:07:52 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.69/1.88  
% 1.69/1.88  SPASS V 3.9 
% 1.69/1.88  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 1.69/1.88  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.69/1.88  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 1.69/1.88  SPASS derived 7474 clauses, backtracked 842 clauses, performed 5 splits and kept 4016 clauses.
% 1.69/1.88  SPASS allocated 82571 KBytes.
% 1.69/1.88  SPASS spent	0:00:01.50 on the problem.
% 1.69/1.88  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 1.69/1.88  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 1.69/1.88  		0:00:00.08 for inferences.
% 1.69/1.88  		0:00:00.07 for the backtracking.
% 1.69/1.88  		0:00:01.26 for the reduction.
% 1.69/1.88  
% 1.69/1.88  
% 1.69/1.88  Here is a proof with depth 3, length 10 :
% 1.69/1.88  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.69/1.88  Formulae used in the proof : prove_cantor_class_alternate_defn_1 not_subclass_members1 not_subclass_members2 intersection1 cantor_class
% 1.69/1.88  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------