TSTP Solution File: SET498-6 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SET498-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:18:29 EDT 2022

% Result   : Timeout 300.03s 300.18s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : SET498-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 18:37:05 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36  The process was started by sandbox on n006.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36  Sun Jul 10 18:37:05 2022
% 0.12/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 23710.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.36  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.36  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.36  clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 165 during input processing: 0 [copy,165,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.36  165 back subsumes 75.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.55/0.76  
% 0.55/0.76  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.55/0.76  
% 0.55/0.76  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.55/0.76  
% 0.55/0.76  
% 0.55/0.76  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.55/0.76  
% 0.55/0.76  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.55/0.76  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.55/0.76  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.55/0.76  number of clauses in intial UL: 61
% 0.55/0.76  number of clauses initially in problem: 146
% 0.55/0.76  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 41
% 0.55/0.76  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 65
% 0.55/0.76  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.55/0.76  absolute distinct symbol count: 58
% 0.55/0.76     distinct predicate count: 11
% 0.55/0.76     distinct function count: 34
% 0.55/0.76     distinct constant count: 13
% 0.55/0.76  
% 0.55/0.76  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.55/0.76  
% 0.55/0.76  
% 0.55/0.76  
% 0.55/0.76  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.55/0.76  
% 0.55/0.76  =========== start of search ===========
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Changing weight limit from 60 to 41.
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Model 2 [ 8 1 8194 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Model 3 [ 21 1 906 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Model 4 [ 54 2 10965 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Model 5 [ 56 3 23566 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Model 6 [ 77 1 697 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Model 7 [ 64 1 1125 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Model 8 [ 45 1 6110 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Model 9 [ 58 1 3722 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Model 10 [ 51 1 2990 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Model 11 [ 57 3 59256 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Model 12 [ 56 1 5885 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Model 13 [ 59 1 6473 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Model 14 [ 74 3 19768 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Model 15 [ 71 2 7053 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.73/11.93  Resetting weight limit to 41 after 135 givens.
% 11.73/11.93  
% 11.80/12.02  
% 11.80/12.02  
% 11.80/12.02  Changing weight limit from 41 to 31.
% 11.80/12.02  
% 11.80/12.02  Resetting weight limit to 31 after 140 givens.
% 11.80/12.02  
% 11.93/12.11  
% 11.93/12.11  
% 11.93/12.11  Changing weight limit from 31 to 29.
% 11.93/12.11  
% 11.93/12.11  Resetting weight limit to 29 after 145 givens.
% 11.93/12.11  
% 11.96/12.20  
% 11.96/12.20  
% 11.96/12.20  Changing weight limit from 29 to 26.
% 11.96/12.20  
% 11.96/12.20  Resetting weight limit to 26 after 150 givens.
% 11.96/12.20  
% 12.11/12.29  
% 12.11/12.29  
% 12.11/12.29  Changing weight limit from 26 to 24.
% 12.11/12.29  
% 12.11/12.29  Resetting weight limit to 24 after 155 givens.
% 12.11/12.29  
% 12.19/12.38  
% 12.19/12.38  
% 12.19/12.38  Changing weight limit from 24 to 23.
% 12.19/12.38  
% 12.19/12.38  Resetting weight limit to 23 after 160 givens.
% 12.19/12.38  
% 12.44/12.65  
% 12.44/12.65  
% 12.44/12.65  Changing weight limit from 23 to 22.
% 12.44/12.65  
% 12.44/12.65  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.44/12.65  
% 12.44/12.65  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.44/12.65  
% 12.44/12.65  Resetting weight limit to 22 after 165 givens.
% 12.44/12.65  
% 300.03/300.18  Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------